Hi
By the ways,after I restart the web container ,the ratio returns normal.
So when does the sutuation come out?
Regards
2014/1/16 YouPeng Yang
> Hi
> Thanks for the reply.
> I get the information as following:
>
> [solr@fkapp1 ~]$
Hello,
can anyone suggest alternatives to GATE (http://gate.ac.uk/download/)? I would
like to index place and person names in PDFs using gazetteers (ie,
dictionaries) and normalize dates ( (eg, December 1st, 2001 will be indexed as
20011201) and feed the indexes to SOLR?
GATE is a great tool,
Hi
Thanks for the reply.
I get the information as following:
[solr@fkapp1 ~]$ ps mp 13359 -o THREAD,tid
USER %CPU PRI SCNT WCHAN USER SYSTEM TID
solr 217 -- - - - -
solr 0.0 21- 184466-
Hi all,
Can I change the value of term frequency for certain files while at query
time?
For ex: if there is a scenario in which I want to ignore term frequency of
*title* field, can I modify solr/lucene code to always gives term frequency
for title as 1.
One possible way of doing it can be this
1
I wonder if this would be a good addition to Solr Admin functionality?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Invoke
But the latter gives users the flexibility of putting together any
T+F1FN chains they want and easily adding their own custom Fx to the
mix.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM,
Hi,
I think this is a known issue and I don't know of anyone working on
changing this.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:46 PM, longsan wrote:
> Hi, i'm newer for solr cloud. i met a
Hi, i'm newer for solr cloud. i met a question here.
we use hdfs as file storage service and use Solr cloud to provide indexing
service and query service.
But solr cloud will replicate index/data files between leader and replica.
And the hdfs replicates the files too.
i think it wil waste disk s
Ahmet,
So, this is an interesting difference between Lucene (and ES) and
Solr. In Lucene, the idea seems to be that you package up a reusable
analysis chain as an analyzer. Saying 'use analyzer X' is less complex
than saying 'use tokenizer T and filters F1, F2, ...'.
thanks,
benson
On Wed, Jan
Hey Hamish,
You might want to check this out LUCENE-5402 . I added support for
index-time pruning for suggesters that consumes from the index itself.
I plan to add this support to file-based suggesters as well.
In order to use this functionality from Solr, more changes are required. I
am planning
Thanks Tomás, I'll take a look.
Still interested to hear from anyone about using queries to populate the
list - I'm willing to give up a bit of performance for the flexibility it
would provide.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think your
On 1/15/2014 5:20 PM, Andreas Owen wrote:
I'm using solr 4.3.1 and have installed it on a win 2008 server. Solr is
working, for example import & search. But the admin guis right side isn't
loading and I get a javascript error for several d3-objects.
Could one of these be the problem?
https://
I'm using solr 4.3.1 and have installed it on a win 2008 server. Solr is
working, for example import & search. But the admin guis right side isn't
loading and I get a javascript error for several d3-objects. The last error
is:
Load timeout for modules: lib/order!lib/jquery.autogrow
lib/order!li
I think your use case is the one described in LUCENE-5350, maybe you want
to take a look to the patch and comments there.
Tomás
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Hamish Campbell <
hamish.campb...@koordinates.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking into options for filtering the search suggestions
On 1/15/2014 3:10 PM, cwhi wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I did notice the exception you pointed out and
had some thoughts about it maybe being the client library I'm using to
connect to Solr (C# SolrNet) disconnecting too early, but that doesn't
explain it eventually running out of memory a
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the quick reply. I did notice the exception you pointed out and
had some thoughts about it maybe being the client library I'm using to
connect to Solr (C# SolrNet) disconnecting too early, but that doesn't
explain it eventually running out of memory altogether. A large index
Hi Benson,
Using lucene analyzer in schema.xlm should be last resort. For very specific
reasons : if you have an existing analyzer, etc.
Ahmet
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:52 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters never
mentions an Analyz
On 1/15/2014 2:43 PM, cwhi wrote:
I have a SolrCloud installation with about 2 million documents indexed in it.
It's been buzzing along without issue for the past 8 days, but today started
throwing errors on document adds that eventually resulted in out of memory
exceptions. There is nothing fun
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters never
mentions an Analyzer class.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins talks about subclasses of
SolrAnalyzer as ways of delivering an entire analysis chain and still
'minding the gap'.
Anyone care to offer a comparison of the viewpoi
I have a SolrCloud installation with about 2 million documents indexed in it.
It's been buzzing along without issue for the past 8 days, but today started
throwing errors on document adds that eventually resulted in out of memory
exceptions. There is nothing funny going on. There are a few infre
I am still unsuccessful in getting this to work. My expectation is that the
index-anchor plugin should produce values for the field anchor. However this
field is not showing up in my Solr index no matter what I try.
Here's what I have in my nutch-site.xml for plugins:
protocol-http|urlfilter-regex
Hi all,
I'm looking into options for filtering the search suggestions dictionary.
Using Solr 4.6.0, Suggester component and fst.FuzzyLookupFactory using a
field based dictionary, we're indexing records for a multi-tenanted SaaS
platform. SearchHandler records are always filtered by the particular
Solved. It was a 'misconfigured' solrconfig.xml
Had this:
Fixed backing to default and adding a path for json updates:
application/json
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Error-while-trying-to-index-doc-on-replica-tp4111504p4111534.html
Sent from t
(Note: cross-posted to various lucene user lists, if you have replies
please keep them on general@lucene, but pleast note that specific
questions should be addressed to travel-assista...@apache.org)
- - - Forwarded Announcement - - -
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased
What’s the benefit? So you can avoid having a simple core properties file? I’d
rather see more value than that prompt exposing something like this to the
user. It’s a can of warms that I personally have not seen a lot of value in yet.
Whether we mark it experimental or not, this adds a burden, a
Thanks Erick..
When tailing the log i get several similar errors:
INFO - 2014-01-15 18:28:50.250;
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor; [ds_target]
webapp=/solr path=/update
params={distrib.from=http://172.0.60.97:80/solr/ds_target/&update.distrib=TOLEADER&wt=javabin&version=2}
{}
Right, the error returned to the client often isn't a complete list.
Take a look at your Solr logs as you try to index this, that may give
you a better idea of what happens.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:05 PM, aabreur wrote:
> I have a collection that has only one shard. There are two n
I have a collection that has only one shard. There are two nodes of this
shard, a leader and a replica.
When trying to index a doc to the leader, everything goes OK:
POST
xx.x.xx.x/solr/ds_target/update?commit=true
{
"add": {
"doc": {
"key1": "value1",
"key2": "value2"
This is true. But if we slap big "warning: experimental" messages all over it,
then users can't complain too much about backwards-compat breaks. My intention
when pulling all this stuff into the CoresLocator interface was to allow other
implementations to be tested out, and other suggestions h
great, thanks Yonik. My testing had shown that was the case but I wasn't
sure if that was just happenstance or something that was guaranteed by the
API. Again I appreciate the fast response!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jamie Johnson
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Is there any guarantee in Solr/Lucene for the order of values in a stored
> field?
Yes, order is preserved.
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org -- off-heap filters for solr
I think these API’s are pretty new and deep to want to support them for users
at this point. It constrains refactoring and can complicates things down the
line, especially with SolrCloud. This same discussion has come up in JIRA
issues before. At best, I think all the recent refactoring in this
Thanks Joel, really appreciate your help. I'll keep an eye on the 4.6.1
release.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Result-Grouping-vs-CollapsingQParserPlugin-tp4111331p4111486.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think solr.xml is the correct place for it, and you can then set up
substitution variables to allow it to be set by environment variables, etc.
But let's discuss on the JIRA ticket.
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
On 15 Jan 2014, at 15:39, Steven Bower wrote:
> I will open up a JIRA... I'm mo
Is there any guarantee in Solr/Lucene for the order of values in a stored
field? For instance if we did the following
document.addField("text", "value 1");
document.addField("text", "value 2");
document.addField("text", "value 3");
is there a guarantee that the document will return the field
v
I will open up a JIRA... I'm more concerned over the core locator stuff vs
the solr.xml.. Should the specification of the core locator go into the
solr.xml or via some other method?
steve
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Alan Woodward wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I think this is a great idea. Curre
Sorry,
I found the error myself..I need to specify configName as paramete rof
setCollectionConfigName():
createRequest.setCollectionConfigName(configName);
Best,
Flavio
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> Hi to everybody,
>
> I'm trying to create a collection prog
Hi to everybody,
I'm trying to create a collection programmatically instead of doing via
http.
Is that possible? I found around to use something like
CoreAdminRequest.Create createRequest = new CoreAdminRequest.Create();
createRequest.setCoreName(coreName);
createRequest.setCollectionConfigName
Done for the Solr contributor's group. Yours is the only one with a space in it,
hope it works. I know of no reason it won't, just something I noticed...
Let us know if you have problems.
Best and thanks!
Erick
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Ramzi Alqrainy
wrote:
> My wiki username Ramzi Alqr
Thanks Lance for clearing.
One more Question: Is there a possibility of integrating boosting with
payloads in LUCENE-2899 with solr?
Thanks in Advance
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:46 PM, rashi gandhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Also i wanted know,
> Is it possible to integrate wordnet with this analyzer?
> I
"During query time, depending on the query, results can be returned from
both
shards. For e.g. a query
q=solr&group=true&group.field=adskdedup&group.ngroups=true would ideally
return data from both shards and apply the grouping on shard1 based on
adskdedup field. This will also ensure that group.ng
Hello,
Invoke top for particular process displaying threads enabled.
Find the hottest thread PID.
invoke jstack for this process, find the suspicious thread by "..
nid=0x[PID in hex]"
...
PROFIT!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:38 PM, YouPeng Yang wrote:
> Hi
> I find that the cpu ratio is very hig
Hello Yago,
This condition doesn't help to reduce computation significantly for
facet.method=fc nor fcs, it might help for enum, but it requires
implementation efforts. Also, my feeling is that you have much more
performance challenges if you have million size facets response, it's not
typical usa
My wiki username Ramzi Alqrainy
--
Sincerely ,
*Ramzi Alqrainy*
Mobile: +962 (7) 9551 6105
Email: ramzi.alqra...@gmail.com
My Profile: http://jo.linkedin.com/in/ramzialqrainy
--
This e-mail and any attachments to it contains information which may be
confiden
Hi,
I'm wondering if Solr has some feature like face.mincount but for maxcount.
I have an use case where I need to know what facets have less than n
elements.
I can do this adding the facet.limit=-1 parameter and fetch the whole set
and client-side remove the elements that don't match the thres
Hi
I find that the cpu ratio is very high when the tomcat contained solr
4.6 sleep.
The pid 13359 shows that my sleeping solr web container take high cpu
ratio
Any insights?
[solr@fkapp1 ~]$ top -d -1 -u solr
top - 17:30:15 up 302 days, 7:10, 5 users, load average: 4.54, 4.52, 4.47
Tas
*Hi,
I'm trying to add searchComponent to my solr. It works fine except
pagination. The results are print but pagination get data from solr quey
results. Have any ideas?
Xml returned:*
0
8972
true
layout
id,title,author,last
47 matches
Mail list logo
