On 10/9/2013 8:39 PM, deniz wrote:
> Billnbell wrote
>> You have to update the whole record including all fields...
>
> so what is the point of having atomic updates if i need to update
> everything?
If you have any regular fields that are not stored, atomic updates will
not work -- unstored fie
Billnbell wrote
> You have to update the whole record including all fields...
so what is the point of having atomic updates if i need to update
everything?
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-with-default-valu
You have to update the whole record including all fields...
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 7:50 PM, deniz wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> I have encountered some problems and post it on stackoverflow here:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19285251/solr-field-with-default-value-res
hi all,
I have encountered some problems and post it on stackoverflow here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19285251/solr-field-with-default-value-resets-itself-if-it-is-stored-false
as you can see from the response, does it make sense to open a bug ticket
for this? because, although i can w
Hi,
Not as I know of. You'd probably want to subclass SynonymFilter* with your own
DB aware implementation, and of course contribute this back :)
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
9. okt. 2013 kl. 23:31 skrev ALEX PKB :
> Hi,
> All of our synonyms are m
Bharat,
Can you look at the logs on the Master when you issue the delete and
the subsequent commits and share that?
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Akkinepalli, Bharat (ELS-CON)
wrot
Hi Rohit,
The main problem is that if the query inside the filter does not have a
PostFilter implementation then your post filter is silently transformed
into a simple filter. The query "field:value" is based on the inverted
lists and does not have a postfilter support.
If your field is a numeric f
Hi,
All of our synonyms are maintained in DB, we would like to fetch those
synonym dynamically for query expansion (Not indexing time). Are there any
code contribution?
I saw some discussion years ago but without conclusion.
Thanks a lot!
It depends whether multicad is a special case, or whether you want micr
to match the term "microsoft".
If it is a special case, you can use synonyms, so that multi and
multicad are considered the same term.
If it isn't a special case, then ngrams could work - your document would
be indexed with:
yes i get that. actually i should have explained in more detail.
- i have a query which gets certain documents.
- the post filter gets these matched documents and does some processing on
them and filters the results.
- but after this is done i need to apply another filter - which is why i
gave a h
search by "starts with" is something new I have to add, as well as the data I
have to index for this purpose, so it's ok to create a new field.
But once I added the following field type:
And:
indexing, and afterwards searching
The admin/analysis page is definitely your friend. On the
surface, [catenateWords="1"] in WDFF should mash the
split up bits of multiCAD into multicad and you should be.
I suspect that StandardTokenizerFactory is somehow getting
into the mix here. Under any circumstance, the admin/analysis
page sh
On 10/9/2013 2:16 PM, adm1n wrote:
Why this field have to be copyField? Couldn't it be a single field, for
I always assume that people already are using the existing field and
type for other purposes. Offering advice without making that assumption
will usually result in people making a chang
bq: ...in the sense that there's only one canonical copy.
Agreed, and as you say that copy is kept in ZooKeeper.
And I pretty much guarantee that the internal solrconfig object
is NOT shared. I doubt the schema object is shared, but it seems
like it could be with some work.
But the savings p
Shawn Heisey-4:
thanks for the quick response.
Why this field have to be copyField? Couldn't it be a single field, for
example:
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/matching-start
Ah, I think you're misunderstanding the nature of post-filters.
Or I'm confused, which happens a lot!
The whole point of post filters is that they're assumed to be
expensive (think ACL calculation). So you want them to run
on the fewest documents possible. So only docs that make it
through the pri
On 10/9/2013 12:57 PM, adm1n wrote:
My index contains documents which could be a single word or a short sentence
which contains up to 4-5 words. I need to return documents, which "starts
with" only from the searched pattern.
in regex it would be [^my_query].
for example, for a docs:
black
beaut
My index contains documents which could be a single word or a short sentence
which contains up to 4-5 words. I need to return documents, which "starts
with" only from the searched pattern.
in regex it would be [^my_query].
for example, for a docs:
black
beautiful black cat
cat
cat is black
black
Apologies all. I think the suggestion that I was replying "to get noticed"
is what erked me, otherwise I would have moved on. I'll follow this advice.
Cheers,
Tim
On 9 October 2013 05:20, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Tim:
>
> I think you're mis-interpreting. By replying to a post with the subject:
@Furkan Pastebin link is working for me. Can you try again ?
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Saurabh,
> Your link does not work (it is broken).
>
>
> 2013/10/9 Saurabh Saxena
>
> > Pastbin link http://pastebin.com/cnkXhz7A
> >
> > I am doing a bulk request. I am upload
On 10/8/13 6:51 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
Is there a way to configure Solr 'defaults/appends/invariants' such that
the product of the 'start' and 'rows' parameters doesn't exceed a given
value? This would be to prevent deep pagination. Or would this require a
custom requestHandler?
Peter
Just wo
Are you asking something like that:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TextProfileSignature
9 Ekim 2013 Çarşamba tarihinde shahzad73 adlı
kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
> Please help me formulate the query that will be easy or do i have to
build a
> custom filter for this ?
>
> Shahzad
>
>
>
> --
> View this m
Thanks for the clarification.
In Solr Cloud just use 1 connection. In non-cloud environments you will need
one per core.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/7/2013 3:08 PM, Mark wrote:
>> Some specific questions:
>> - When working with HttpSolrServer should we keep around
On 10/9/2013 1:17 AM, xinwu wrote:
I remember I must put the
"-Dbootstrap_confdir=/opt/Solr_home/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=solrConfig " in the catalina.sh .
Is it means that solrCloud must have one ,and only one, schema?
Those bootstrap options are intended to be used ONCE, and
Hi All,
I have an issue in handling filters for one of our requirements and
liked to get suggestion for the best approaches.
*Use Case:*
1. We have List of groups and the number of groups can increase upto >1
million. Currently we have almost 90 thousand groups in the solr search
system.
On 10/9/2013 6:24 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Hmmm, I hadn't thought about that before. The shareSchema
stuff is keyed off the absolute directory (and timestamp) of
the schema.xml file associated with a core and is about
sharing the internal object that holds the parsed schema.
Do you know for sur
my client has a strange requirement, he will give a list of 500 words and
then set a percentage like 80% now he want to find those pages or
documents which consist of the only those 80% of 500 and only 20% unknown.
like we have this document
word1 word2
Please help me formulate the query that will be easy or do i have to build a
custom filter for this ?
Shahzad
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Find-documents-that-are-composed-of-words-tp4094264p4094372.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Hey,
so the post filter logs the number of ids that it receives.
With the above filter having cost=200, the post filter should have received
the same number of ids as before ( when the filter was not present ).
But that does not seem to be the case...with the filter query on the index,
the number o
Hi,
In a content management system I have a document and an attachment. The
document contains the meta data and the attachment the actual data.
I would like to combine data of both in one Solr document.
I have thought of several options:
1. Using ExtractingRequestHandler I would extract the dat
If you have that word to index: "multicad" and if you want to get result
when you search that: "multi" you can use ngram filter. However you should
consider pros and cons of using Ngram Filter. If you use ngrams you may
find "multicad" from "multi" but your index size will be much more bigger.
I s
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5324
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yago Riveiro wrote:
> If the replica has 20G must probably the recovery will take more than 120
> seconds.
>
> In my case I have ssd's and 120 it's not enough.
>
> --
> Yago Riveiro
> Sent with Sparrow (htt
I'm not sure, may be solr should skip inaccessible directory.
Because it is standard rule to place service on separate filesystem.
On the other hand it is possible to place solr/home not on the top of
mounted fs.
Anyway it would be better if error message was more clearly.
2013/10/9 Erick Erickso
Thank you Upayavira.
I'm trying to figure out what will make Solr stem on "multi" in the word
"multicad" so that any attempt to search on "multicad", "Multi-CAD" or
"multiCAD" will return results. The WordDelimiterFilterFactory helps with the
case of multi followed by a dash or a capital letter
What do you think Solr should do in this case? If the
process doesn't have permission to the dir, it can't
write to it. You need to set the permissions, or the
authority of the process that Solr is running as
appropriately.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Said Chavkin wrote:
> Hello.
If you create a Wiki login, I'll be happy to add you to the
contributors list. It's always valuable to have fresh eyes
update docs while the ambiguities are still fresh!
Erick
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Jan Van Besien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>> Thi
Hello.
When in solr/home directory exists directory to which solr do not have
rights, then solr failed to start with exception:
2108 [main] INFO org.apache.solr.core.CoresLocator - Looking for core
definitions underneath /var/lib/solr
2109 [main] ERROR org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter -
Hi Shahzad,
Have you tried with the Minimum Should Match feature:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can take your words, combine some % of them with AND. Then take
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> This worked for me if I do NOT have a core.properties at all in my new
> core. Personally I think the behavior in 4.4 was dangerous, what
> happens if you mis-type the command for instance? You could do Bad
> Things to the old core you were
Shawn:
Hmmm, I hadn't thought about that before. The shareSchema
stuff is keyed off the absolute directory (and timestamp) of
the schema.xml file associated with a core and is about
sharing the internal object that holds the parsed schema.
Do you know for sure if the fact that this is coming from
Tim:
I think you're mis-interpreting. By replying to a post with the subject:
{soft}Commit and cache flushing
but going in a different direction, it's easy for people to think "I'm
not interested in that
thread, I'll ignore it", thereby missing the fact that you're asking a
somewhat different
qu
Jan:
This worked for me if I do NOT have a core.properties at all in my new
core. Personally I think the behavior in 4.4 was dangerous, what
happens if you mis-type the command for instance? You could do Bad
Things to the old core you were inadvertently re-creating.
The core.properties file gets
Hi,
You can take your words, combine some % of them with AND. Then take another
set of them OR it with the previous set, and so on.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Oct 9, 2013 6:54 AM, "shahzad73" wrote:
> Is there a way that in Solr Query i find documents that is
David,
Yes. Document grouping (aka field collapsing) will help you here. It
should also allow you to create a better search experience on the front end
- it's often better to narrow down where in a large document a match is
than give users a large doc and say: we know the match is in here
somewhe
Yes, the problem described in the ticket is what I'm also confronting with.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-API-wrong-configuration-in-4-5-0-tp4094319p4094335.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is there a way that in Solr Query i find documents that is composed of n
number of words. for example here is the list of words
- Love
- Ice
- Cream
- Sunny
- I
- To
- A
- On
- Elephant
- Balloon
And a percentage such as: 80%
Let’s assume you’re analyzing the text of the following sentence.
Works fine at my end. I use Solr 4.5.0 on Windows 7.
I tried:
>zkcli.bat -cmd upconfig -zkhost localhost:9000 -d
..\solr\collection2\conf -n my_custom_collection
>java -Djetty.port=8001 -DzkHost=localhost:9000 -jar start.jar
and finally
http://localhost:8001/solr/admin/collections?action=CRE
This may be a bug in 4.5
Another user has also reported this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5307
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, maephisto wrote:
> Using Solr 4.4.0 the same scenarion behaves as expected.
>
> Can anyone else try this, to check if it this only happens with 4.5.
Using Solr 4.4.0 the same scenarion behaves as expected.
Can anyone else try this, to check if it this only happens with 4.5.0 and if
so, is this a desired behaviour or a bug?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-API-wrong-configuration-tp4094319p40943
OK. Then the JSON returned would contain a lot of documents that are
really sections. This would work fine for the use-case I mentioned but I
also use the index for full-text search of the whole document. Therefore,
I would need to parse the result JSON in a way that combines the solr docs
return
I'm experimenting with SolrCloud using Solr 4.5.0 and the Collection API
What i did was:
1. upload configuration to ZK
zkcli.sh -cmd upconfig -zkhost 127.0.0.1:8993 -d
solr/my_custom_collection/conf/ -n my_custom_collection
2. create a collection using the api:
/admin/collections?action=CREATE&n
The synonyms.txt has defined the next associations defined.
AIO=>All in one
aio=>all-in-one
Regards.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Alvaro Cabrerizo wrote:
> No, it has no synonyms.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
>
>> Does "two" has a synonym of "in" and "one"?
>
No, it has no synonyms.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Does "two" has a synonym of "in" and "one"?
>
>
> 2013/10/9 Furkan KAMACI
>
>> Does "two" has a synonym of "in" and "one"?
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/9 Alvaro Cabrerizo
>>
>>> Sure,
>>>
>>> Find attached the screenshots with
Does "two" has a synonym of "in" and "one"?
2013/10/9 Furkan KAMACI
> Does "two" has a synonym of "in" and "one"?
>
>
> 2013/10/9 Alvaro Cabrerizo
>
>> Sure,
>>
>> Find attached the screenshots with almost all the analysis, (dont worry
>> about the lowercase and the porter stemmer)
>>
>> Regar
I will try using solrJ.
Now I tried indexing .docx files and I get some different error,logs are:
SEVERE: null:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/poi/extractor/ExtractorFactory, method: createExtractor signature:
(Lorg/apache/poi/poifs/filesystem/DirectoryNode;
I will try using solrj.Thanks.
but I tried to index .docx file I am getting some different error:
SEVERE: null:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/poi/extractor/ExtractorFactory, method: createExtractor signature:
(Lorg/apache/poi/poifs/filesystem/DirectoryNode
Sure,
Find attached the screenshots with almost all the analysis, (dont worry
about the lowercase and the porter stemmer)
Regards.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Could you send screenshot of admin Analysis page when trying to analyze
> that words?
>
>
> 2013/10/9 Al
You can have more information from here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Using+ZooKeeper+to+Manage+Configuration+Files
2013/10/9 xinwu
> I remember I must put the
> "-Dbootstrap_confdir=/opt/Solr_home/collection1/conf
> -Dcollection.configName=solrConfig " in the catalina.sh .
Could you send screenshot of admin Analysis page when trying to analyze
that words?
2013/10/9 Alvaro Cabrerizo
> Hi:
>
> I'm involved in a process o upgrade solr from 1.4 to 4.4 and I'm having a
> problem using SynonymFilterFactory within the process chain
> SynonymFilterFactory, StopFilterFac
Hi Saurabh,
Your link does not work (it is broken).
2013/10/9 Saurabh Saxena
> Pastbin link http://pastebin.com/cnkXhz7A
>
> I am doing a bulk request. I am uploading 100 files, each file having 100
> docs.
>
> -Saurabh
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> > The attachm
I suggest you to look at here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=cloudsolrserver&titlesearch=Titles#Using_with_SolrCloud
2013/10/9 Shawn Heisey
> On 10/7/2013 3:08 PM, Mark wrote:
>
>> Some specific questions:
>> - When working with HttpSolrServer should we k
I remember I must put the
"-Dbootstrap_confdir=/opt/Solr_home/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=solrConfig " in the catalina.sh .
Is it means that solrCloud must have one ,and only one, schema?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-schemas-in-the-s
Hi David,
A separate Solr document for each section is a good option if you also need
to handle phrases, case, special characters, etc. within the title field.
How do you map them to dynamic fields?
E.g.: "Appendix for cities", "APPENDIX 1: Cities"
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM
You can simply have multiple collections, each independent of each other on
the schema but could run on the same instance/jvm if you want.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:36 PM, xinwu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to use the multiple schemas in the same solrCloud, is it allowed?
>
> If it is allowed,ho
Hi:
I'm involved in a process o upgrade solr from 1.4 to 4.4 and I'm having a
problem using SynonymFilterFactory within the process chain
SynonymFilterFactory, StopFilterFactory .
I have configured synonyms.txt to expand the word AIO as: all-in-one. Well,
when using solr 1.4 I get the following r
Hi all,
I want to use the multiple schemas in the same solrCloud, is it allowed?
If it is allowed,how?
These schemas may have no relation.
Thank You.
Dai.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-schemas-in-the-same-SolrCloud-tp4094279.html
Sent from th
66 matches
Mail list logo
