On 9/13/2013 6:56 PM, suren wrote:
> I tried below 3 methods to sort the output from solr 4.3.1., no error and not
> sorting on any given field.
> 1)addSort(field, order)
> 2)addOrUpdateSort(field, order)
> 3)setSort(field, order)
>
> my schema setting for the fields i tried are
> multiValued="fa
Hello
I have a question about patent. I believe Apache license is protecting Solr
developers from patent issue in Solr community. But is there any case that
Solr developer or Solr users are alleged by outside of Solr Community? Is
there any cases somebody experienced? Any advice is appreciat
I tried below 3 methods to sort the output from solr 4.3.1., no error and not
sorting on any given field.
1)addSort(field, order)
2)addOrUpdateSort(field, order)
3)setSort(field, order)
my schema setting for the fields i tried are
Any one please tell me why the sorting is not working?
--
Vi
Okay, it's hot off the e-presses: my updated book Solr 4.x Deep Dive, Early
Access Release #7 is now available for purchase and download as an e-book
for $9.99 on Lulu.com at:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-1/ebook/product-21120181.html
(That lin
Hi Weber,
Returning the distance separately from the score is really awkward without
being able to use geodist() (which is coming in Solr 4.5 for the RPT spatial
field). But as you note in SOLR-4255 it is possible. If you modify the Solr
example schema so that the 'store' spatial field is of type
: I asked this before... But can we add a parameter for SOLR to expose the
: compression modes to solrconfig.xml ?
Bill: note my previous response...
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201304.mbox/%3Calpine.DEB.2.02.1304251901350.3628@frisbee%3E
...because of how the cod
Hi all,
i am facing an issue while trying to update a document.
I am using SolrJ to add/update documents of my collection. The SolrJ
version is 4.0.0 ( but i also tried with the latest 4.4.0 )
I am aware that in multivalue fields i can only add an element but not
remove, in fact for those fields I
I'm wondering what happens to commit while we are indexing in parallel in
Solr. Are the indexing update requests blocked until the commit finishes ?
Lets say I've a process P1 which issued a commit request and there is
another process P2 which is still indexing to the same index. What happens
to
Ok I have solved it my self.. The issue was in "data" directory of
"solr/{myCore}/".. I deleted this folder and it started running again.
however, this is even a bigger issue now, because when the project is LIVE
and it has indexed millions of records, I wont have the option to remove
the "data" f
Thanks Otis. I'll look into it if I can use it to solve my problem.
-
Phani Chaitanya
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-the-commit-time-of-a-document-in-Solr-tp4089624p4089949.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: i am facing an issue while trying to update a document.
: I am using SolrJ to add/update documents of my collection. The SolrJ
: I am aware that in multivalue fields i can only add an element but not
: remove, in fact for those fields I am overriding all the values every time.
: Everything work
: after a lot of investigation today, I found that its the spellcheck
: component which is causing the issue. If its turned off, all will run well
: and core can easily reload. However, when the spellcheck is on, the core
: wont reload instead hang forever.
Can you take some stack traces while th
Hi guyz,
I have an issue here in between Solr Core and Data Indexing:
When I build some index from fresh setup, everything is fine: all queries
and additional/update indexing, everything runs is fine. But when I reload
the Core, the solr stops from that point onward forever.
All i get is this li
On 9/13/2013 12:03 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
What is it that will fill my heap? I am trying to avoid the FieldCache.
For now, I am actually not doing any searches - focus on indexing for
now - and certainly not group/facet/sort searches that will use the
FieldCache.
I don't know what makes up t
On 9/13/2013 12:50 PM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] wrote:
Does this sound appropriate then? [assuming no 3rd server]
Server A:
Zoo Keeper
SOLR with 1 shard
Server B:
SOLR with ZK Host parameter set to Server A
Yes, that will work, but if the ZK on server A goes down, the entire
cloud is down.
Whe
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> AFAIk, enablePositionIncrements=false is deprecated in 4.x but not
> removed. It will be removed in 5.0 though.
Hmmm, I had missed that.
Anyone have pointers to an example of what "broken" means and why it
can't be fixed?
It seems p
I don't have any additional questions, and won't, until you are able to
supply the information requested in my previous response.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kuchekar
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Different Respons
Hi,
The input text = 'cancer', field = 'content', field type
='text_general'.
Analyzer for the filed is as follows :
<
filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
Manual Search count on the term 'cancer' in the field 'content', gave me
515 hits. This makes me believe that tf
Any specific error? Anything in the logs when it hangs?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/spellcheck-causing-Core-Reload-to-hang-tp4089866p4089931.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Shawn -
Does this sound appropriate then? [assuming no 3rd server]
Server A:
Zoo Keeper
SOLR with 1 shard
Server B:
SOLR with ZK Host parameter set to Server A
Jeremy D. Branham
Performance Technologist II
Sprint University Performance Support
Fort Worth, TX | Tel: **DOTNET
Office: +1
Hi,
I have a general design question about federated search that I'd like to
get some thoughts on.
I have several line of business applications that manage their own data.
There is a need to search across these LOB apps, but each of them have
different authorization schemes in terms of allowing u
I messed up. In my 50+ million document index, I have a field in my
schema.xml that is of type "int". I should have made it a long; documents
that have a field that overflows that integer aren't being indexed.
Does changing this field type absolutely, positively require a re-index?
What would h
Here's the field definition:
Here's the stack trace:
WARNING: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: enablePositionIncrements=false is
not supported anymore as of Lucene 4.4 as it can create broken token
streams
org.apache.solr.clien
Hallo,
I want to trigger a deltaimportquery by given IDs.
Example:
query="select oid, att1, att2 from my_table"
deltaImportQuery="select oid, att1, att2 from my_table
WHERE oid=${dih.delta.OID}"
deltaQuery="select OID from my_table WHERE
TIME_STAMP > TO_DATE
Hi,
Following is the debug query results :
*Solr 3.5*
true
60.67038
sum of:
true
60.67038
max plus 1.0 times others of:
true
0.44362593
weight(content:cancer^0.5 in 21506339),
product of:
Hi all,
I am working with wildcard queries and few things are confusing.
1. Does a wildcard search omit the analysers on a particular field?
2. I have searched for
q=google\ technology - >gives result
q=google technology -> Gives results
q=google tech* -> gives results
q=google\ tech* -> 0 resu
Currently, our SOLR 1.3 installation shares 4 applications servers with other
Java apps, leveraging master/slave replication.
To get application isolation, we are moving from SOLR 1.3 to 4.3 and acquiring
2 new production [vm] servers for the migration.
For the new SOLR configuration, we are con
Wildcard applies only to a single term. The escaped space suggests that you
are trying to match a wildcard on multiple terms.
Try the contrib complex phrase query parser.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Prasi S
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.
Hi,
after a lot of investigation today, I found that its the spellcheck
component which is causing the issue. If its turned off, all will run well
and core can easily reload. However, when the spellcheck is on, the core
wont reload instead hang forever.
Then the only way to get the project back a
Asterisk and question mark are wildcards, not regex. Regex query is a
regular expression enclosed in slashes, such as:
q=/Googl.*/
And note that not all analyzer filters will be applied to regex terms. You
may need to do the analysis yourself. Although simple filters likethe lower
case filter
On 9/13/2013 10:16 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] wrote:
Currently, our SOLR 1.3 installation shares 4 applications servers with other
Java apps, leveraging master/slave replication.
To get application isolation, we are moving from SOLR 1.3 to 4.3 and acquiring
2 new production [vm] servers for the
On 9/13/2013 1:56 AM, Prasi S wrote:
I want to do regex search in solr.
E.g: Googl* . In my query api, i have used the ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars
funtion to escape characters special to solr.
In the above case, a search for
1. Google -> gives 677 records.
2. Googl* -> Escaped as Googl\* in co
You are right sir, its weird to have no error in the log... So after a full
day spent only on trying to figure this out, I have found the cause
(spellcheck component)... but not the solution.
Se my other post with the subject "*spellcheck causing Core Reload to hang*".
I have explained it there.
Or another possible scenario -
SOLR Cloud with one logical shard and 2 servers would give me replication
without the master/slave setup.
Is that correct?
Jeremy D. Branham
Performance Technologist II
Sprint University Performance Support
Fort Worth, TX | Tel: **DOTNET
http://JeremyBranham.Word
On 9/13/2013 5:47 AM, Raheel Hasan wrote:
Ok I have solved it my self.. The issue was in "data" directory of
"solr/{myCore}/".. I deleted this folder and it started running again.
however, this is even a bigger issue now, because when the project is LIVE
and it has indexed millions of records, I
Hi,
I want to do regex search in solr.
E.g: Googl* . In my query api, i have used the ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars
funtion to escape characters special to solr.
In the above case, a search for
1. Google -> gives 677 records.
2. Googl* -> Escaped as Googl\* in code-> gives 12 results
3. When given
Manuel,
Whether to have the front end solr as aggregator of shard results depends
on your requirements. To repeat, we found merging from many shards very
inefficient fo our use case. It can be the opposite for you (i.e. requires
testing). There are some limitations with distributed search, see her
I have the same issue can anyone tell me if they found a solution?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-getting-started-with-SOLR-tp3497276p4089761.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
?? anyone?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Raheel Hasan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just have this issue came out of no where
> Everything was fine until all of a sudden the browser cant connect to this
> solr.
>
>
> Here is the solr log:
>
> INFO - 2013-09-12 20:07:58.142; org.eclipse.jetty.server
The simplest thing is to exclude empty values in the query: myfield:[*
TO *]
Upayavira
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, at 03:50 PM, Raheel Hasan wrote:
> ok, so I got the idea... I will pull 7 fields instead and remove the
> empty
> one...
>
> But there must be some setting that can be done in Facet confi
You can apply his 4.5 patches to 4.4 or take trunk and it is there
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Sep 12, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Weber wrote:
> I'm trying to get score by using a custom boost and also get the distance. I
> found David's code* to get it using "Intersects", which I want to replace by
On 9/12/13 4:26 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 9/12/2013 2:14 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
Starting from an empty collection. Things are fine wrt
storing/indexing speed for the first two-three hours (100M docs per
hour), then speed goes down dramatically, to an, for us, unacceptable
level (max 10M per
Can we see a full stack trace for that IllegalArgumentException?
AFAIk, enablePositionIncrements=false is deprecated in 4.x but not
removed. It will be removed in 5.0 though.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Christopher Condit wrote:
> While attempting to upgrade from Solr 4.3.0 to Solr 4.4.0 I r
There may be some token filters that are emitting a different number of
terms. There are so many changes between 3.5 and 4.4, that it simply isn't
worth the trouble to track down all of them. In some cases, there may be
bugs in 3.5 that have gotten fixed in any of the intervening releases.
Do
Hi,
After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for
the same field in the same doc in solr 3.5 and 4.4 is different.
example :
If word "fruits" appear in some field for 20 times
In 3.5 tf is reported to be 8, where as in 4.4 solr it reports to be 20.
that is changing
I ended up having to do a mathematical increase of the delay
because the indexing eventually would outstrip the static value I set and
crash the maxWarmingSearchers.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-tp489803p4089699.htm
Thanks Jack, Shawn and Raymond.
Shawn - I've to do it with every commit. So I guess apparently there is no
way apart from writing custom plugins to Solr.
I'll look into the pointers you suggested.
Regards,
Phani.
-
Phani Chaitanya
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
Sorry but I gave up on this issue. I could not resolve it.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:24 PM, suren [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n4089093...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Any update? I am also having the same issue. pls reply.
>
> This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated
>
Apologies again. But here is another try :
I want to make sure that documents that are indexed are committed in say an
hour. I agree that if you pass commitWithIn params and the like will make
sure of that based on the time configurations we set. But, I want to make
sure that the document is reall
49 matches
Mail list logo
