The issue is resolved. I have given all the path inside tomcat as relative
paths( solr home, solr war). That was the creating the problem.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Prasi S wrote:
> Does this have anyting to do with tomcat? I cannot go back as we already
> fixed with tomcat.
>
> Any sugge
hi,
while indexing document with unknown fields, its adding unknown fields in
schema but its always guessing it as string type. is it possible to specify
default field type for unknown fields to some other type, like text so that
it gets tokenized? also can we specify other properties by default l
Mostly I'm just trying to understand. For the moment I'm putting
together a design for distributed Lux (XQuery backed by Solr Cloud). My
motivation is that I am feeding results into its separate XQuery system,
and that requires a consistent global document ordering. The ordering
can be arbitr
"*:*" is a constant score query - every document has the same score, so the
concept of relevancy has no relevance.
But, in theory, you could apply boost queries and function queries to scale
or offset those constant scores. If so, then you should see relevancy
sorting, otherwise the concept of
Hi Dmitry,
If it is something you want to pass with every request (which is my use
case), you can pass it as additional solr params, eg.
python solrjmeter
--additionalSolrParams="fq=other_field:bar+facet=true+facet.field=facet_field_name"
the string should be url encoded.
If it is somethin
My question is about how query results are ordered in a distributed
query when sorting by "relevance" and all the documents have the same
score, for example, when querying for "*:*".
It looks to me as if score ties are broken by shard and then within each
shard, by docid. So for example, if I
Thanks Erick,
I´m trying to looking for english texts now. I put a field type like this:
...
Then I´m trying to find CITY, like this:
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.setQuery("(descricaoRoteiroPhonetic:CITY)" );
QueryResponse rsp = server.query( query );
QueryRespon
What you need to do is include one of the phonetic
filters in your analysis chain, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PhoneticFilterFactory
All you've done with the stemmer is make
things like (sorry, English examples are all I can do)
running, runner etc. be inde
Hi Erick,
Agree, this is perfectly fine to mix them in solr. But my question is about
solrjmeter input query format. Just couldn't find a suitable example on the
solrjmeter's github.
Dmitry
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> filter and facet queries can be freely intermix
Hi -
I'm new to Solr and am trying to combine a script:and & RegExTransformer in
a db-dataconfig.xml that is used to ingest data into Solr. Can anyone be
of any help?
There is definitly a "comma" between my script:add , and addRegexTransfomer
lines.
Any help would be appreciated.
My db-data-co
Please,
How can I make I phonetic search in Solr with portuguese (brazilian)
language?
I tryied including this field type:
...
But this didn´t work. I have no idea about how to make a phonetic search.
I´m using Solr 4.
Thanks in advance,
--
Sergio Stateri Jr.
stat...@gmail.com
On Sep 2, 2013, at 17:39 , Mysurf Mail wrote:
> Hi,
> I am having problems parsing suggest json response in c#.
> Here is an example
>
> {
>
> - responseHeader:
> {
> - status: 0,
> - QTime: 1
> },
> - spellcheck:
> {
> - suggestions:
> [
> - "at",
>
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your prompt response.
Yes, it was my assumption, but will definitely do an analysis if fq query
firing is not possible without q parameter.
With Regards,
Santanu
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> bq: cause *:* consumes more time than a search query.
the following request
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/vault/suggest?wt=json&q=at%20l
Returns phrases that starts with at and with l (as shown below )
Now, what if I want phrases that starts with "At l" such as "At Least..."
Thanks.
{
- responseHeader:
{
- status: 0,
- QTime: 1
Hi,
I am having problems parsing suggest json response in c#.
Here is an example
{
- responseHeader:
{
- status: 0,
- QTime: 1
},
- spellcheck:
{
- suggestions:
[
- "at",
-
{
- numFound: 1,
- startOffset:
I have no idea, especially since the syntax of the query
is wrong, is this a cut/paste error? Because you
should have something like &q=UniqueID:[* TO 123],
you left off the "q=" bit. Otherwise, depending on whether
you have a default query specified you may be getting
a much different query than
bq: cause *:* consumes more time than a search query.
what's your evidence for this? q=*:* is handled specially
as a "constant score query", it should be very fast. Or is
this an assumption on your part?
And remember that even on a *:* query, the first time after
a new searcher is opened there w
filter and facet queries can be freely intermixed, it's not a problem.
What problem are you seeing when you try this?
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> What's the format for running the facet+filter queries?
>
> Would something like this work:
>
> fi
Hello,
I am using solr 3.6
In that one field name is UniqueID.
I want to get only those data which less than some particular UniqueID
So I tried by below mentioned way.
Suppose I want only those results which are less than 123 than
http://SolrURL/Core/select?start=0&Rows=10&..&UniqueID:[*+T
Hi,
Can I use fq parameter without using q parameter.
I don't want to do a search like [q = *:* & fq=field1:""], cause *:*
consumes more time than a search query.
With Regards,
Santanu
On 9/2/2013 5:53 AM, Sergio Stateri wrote:
> How can I looking for an exact phrase in query.setQuery method (SolrJ)?
>
> Like this:
>
> SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
> query.setQuery( "(descricaoRoteiro: BPS 8D BEACH*)" );
> query.set("start", "200");
> query.set("rows", "10");
> query.addFi
Shouldn't the search be more like this if you are searching in the
'descricaoRoteiro' field:
descricaoRoteiro:(BPS 8D BEACH*)
or in your example you have a space in between 'descricaoRoteiro' and 'BPS':
descricaoRoteiro:BPS 8D BEACH*
François
On Sep 2, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Dmitr
Hi,
What's your default query field in solrconfig.xml?
[WHAT IS IN HERE?]
I think what's happening is that the query:
(descricaoRoteiro: BPS 8D BEACH*)
gets interpreted as:
descricaoRoteiro:BPS (8D BEACH*)
then on the (8D BEACH*) a default field name is applied.
You can use debugQuery para
hi,
How can I looking for an exact phrase in query.setQuery method (SolrJ)?
Like this:
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.setQuery( "(descricaoRoteiro: BPS 8D BEACH*)" );
query.set("start", "200");
query.set("rows", "10");
query.addField("descricaoRoteiro");
QueryResponse rsp = server.quer
Hi Roman,
What's the format for running the facet+filter queries?
Would something like this work:
field:foo >=50 fq=other_field:bar facet=true facet.field=facet_field_name
Thanks,
Dmitry
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> With adminPath="/admin" or adminP
hi Erick,
Thanks alot for your reply. i am still looking for any feasible solution,
currently i can only think of creating another core having schema with
patterntokenizer class field types, load it and re-index search results on
this temp core.
is there any way to provide list of patterns for to
Hi,
Following post help you.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7512945/solr-error-opening-new-searcher-exceeded-limit-of-maxwarmingsearchers-2-try
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-starting-problem-after-spellchecker-configuration-tp4087766p4087
Does this have anyting to do with tomcat? I cannot go back as we already
fixed with tomcat.
Any suggestions pls. The same setup , if i copy and run it on a different
machine, it works fine. Am not sure what is missing. Is it because of some
system parameter getting set?
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9
28 matches
Mail list logo
