Thanks, Koji. No, we don't have that option set. Should we?
(13/08/04 14:36), Alex Cougarman wrote:
Hi all. I'm having some issues with highlighting and proximity searching in
Solr 4.x. Matching words in the query are sometimes highlighted even if they
are not within proximity and in some cases, matching words in the query are not
highlighted at all. D
Hi all. I'm having some issues with highlighting and proximity searching in
Solr 4.x. Matching words in the query are sometimes highlighted even if they
are not within proximity and in some cases, matching words in the query are not
highlighted at all. Does anyone know why this would be happenin
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> My guess is you're hitting the first time something is done, like sorting
> or some such
> occasionally on these queries by chance when a new searcher is opened.
And actually, if it was something like sorting (populating a field
cache), then
The client closed the web-browser page or stopped loading or some other
timeout/connection close. Then, the server tries to write to no-longer
existing connection and fails.
If you control the client, then you might have some sort of timeout value,
which kills connections after very long queries.
Perhaps it's not the correct tool here but decompounding using a simple
dictionary decompounder token filter will fix this problem.
-Original message-
> From:Erick Erickson
> Sent: Saturday 3rd August 2013 13:33
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR matching keywords
No good way comes immediately to mind. How would Solr know
that 'wal mart' should be concatenated but 'many people' should
not?
You can do this with somewhat with synonyms, but it depends on
knowing ahead of time what all the possibilities are.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:27 PM, SolrLov
Why can't you shuffle in the app? Once you have the groups returned, _how_
you display them is up to you. And you can sort the groups based on fields.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Bruno René Santos wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> Yes we have lots of documents with the same score. We turned
You might be able to do this by grouping on type, say 10 to a group and
then have the app layer display then in whatever order/proportion you
want. Pagination is "interesting" though.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> You must have some other relevancy rules, r
Hi,
I am generating solr indexing using apache-tomcat-7.0.19 and solr 3.3.
Indexing generated successfully with count of "3350128" records. Now i am
testing my solr index search performance continuously by hitting with
different search queries.
while testing some search queries are getting failed
If the check is not expensive, UpdateRequestProcessor may do the trick. Or
have a flag that is force set on all queries and do atomic update after you
validated.
Regards,
Alex
On 2 Aug 2013 04:48, "Furkan KAMACI" wrote:
> I use Solr 4.2.1 as SolrCloud. My live indexes will be search by huge
How difficult would it be to write percolate as an UpdateRequestProcessor?
Is there a magic hook to parse and run query against single doc?
Regards,
Alex
On 2 Aug 2013 20:10, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
> You seem to be mixing a couple of different concepts here. "Prospective
> search" or reve
I am out of the office until 08/19/2013.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Incremental
update, of a sort" sent on 08/03/2013 0:36:16.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
13 matches
Mail list logo
