Hi Erick,
Thanks for the reply. But help me understand this: If Solr is able to
isolate the two documents which contain the term "fact" being the phonetic
equivalent of the search term "fakt", then why will it be unable to
highlight the terms based on the same logic it uses to search the documents
say &debugQuery=true&mlt=true and see the scores for the MLT query, not a
sample query. You can use Amazon ec2 to bring up your solr, you should be
able to get a micro instance for free trial.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:10 AM, dc tech wrote:
> I did try the raw query against the *simi* field and
I did try the raw query against the *simi* field and those seem to return
results in the order expected.
For instance, Acura MDX has ( large, SUV, 4WD Luxury) in the simi field.
Running a query with those words against the simi field returns the
expected models (X5, Audi Q5, etc) and then the su
Chris
Are those "some" nodes perhaps those you used already before for viewing the
admin UI? If so, we fixed the underlying Caching-Issue with the upcoming 4.2.1
Release (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4311)
Otherwise, what's the definition of "some" in your case? When does it work,
Hey
It well never turn "green" since we have no explicit status for the Importer
when it's done. But, what did you see when you hit the "Refresh" Button at the
bottom of the page? are the numbers counting?
Stefan
On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 5:38 PM, A. Lotfi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I hit E
Hello all,
We are using Apache Solr 4.2 in our application to provide search
capabilities. We are deploying the solr.war file to jboss along with our
application.
Any suggestions on proper security controls for this type of solr setup?
Also solr is now accessible to everyone from the
http://jbos
If you can bring up your solr setup on a public machine then im sure a lot
of debugging can be done. Without that, i think what you should look at is
the tf-idf scores of the terms like "camry" etc. Usually idf is the
deciding factor into which results show at the top (tf should be 1 for your
data)
I am running some experiments on more like this and the results seem rather
odd - I am doing something wrong but just cannot figure out what.
Basically, the similarity results are decent - but not great.
*Issue 1 = Quality*
Toyota Camry : finds Altima (good) but then next one is Camry Hybrid
wher
but i see two different version numbers
Under commit:
1364655616211
22
and under Master/Slave tags
1364619609805
20
Can this be a case anytime on Master ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827p405
Just to clarify this question a little, if I search for the term "specificato"
and designate highlighting (hl=true) then my highlighting comes back fine.
If I search for "something else", designate highlighting and attach a different
query to it (hl.q="specificato") then I do not always get good
Hi,
I am exploring all the possible options.
We want to distribute 1 TB traffic among 3 Slor Shards(Masters) and
corresponding 3 Solr Slaves.
Initially I have used Master/Slave setup. But in this case my traffic rate on
Master is very high, because of this we are facing the blow issue while
r
11 matches
Mail list logo