Hi
I used to execute queries in solr admin page for testing purposes.
I updated to solr 4.1 and it seems this feature is not working.
I can see that the query is always sent without and query parameter.
Is this a known bug?
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabb
Hi,
The CPU spikes but which process is eating the CPU? Assuming JVM -
thread dump it a few times and look at the dumps.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Roupihs wrote:
> I have a puppet manifest that builds solr
I have a puppet manifest that builds solr 4.1 inside of tomcat 7 & java
1.7.15. All goes well, all of the core initialize and so on, But the second
I go to the admin page (host:8080/solr) the cpu usage on one core spikes to
100% and never comes back down. Nothing at all in the logs except for the
w
I am not sure if I understand how the creating cores dynamically
functionality is supposed to work. From what I have sort of figured out is
that I need to specify the instanceDir as the path to a directory which
contains the conf file. So I have directory as template for configuration
files but whe
>
> i believe he wants a consistent ordering that resolves ties in docs
> with identical scores in some way thta doesn't favor documents based on
> any externally visible propery of the documents themselves.
That's correct. If we were starting from scratch, we might start with a
secondary sort o
: bq: we don't want to use either the primary key or the record's
: update date as the tie-breaker, as it may introduce an new bias into the
: ranking algorithm
:
: Are you thinking of adding something to your main clause to force this?
: If so, why not just use sorting by adding a sort clause lik
In addition to the text_lang fields you can of course have a text_general
field which is unstemmed, where you put documents that you don't yet have
language specific handling for.
One potential issue of multi language search is detecting the language of the
query itself.
Sometimes your search pag
Hi Tim - thanks for the answer.
For your assumption: my documents are about 50kb each in the index, but
after two weeks of updating and not removing i have about 40% percent of
unused docs in my index and that has an impact on the query performance.
1) My incentive for optimizing and not merging wa
: sessionAvailableNowQuery = {!edismax}(start_time:[* TO
: 1970-01-01T12:37:030Z] AND end_time:[1970-01-01T12:37:030Z +
: (_val_:order_prep_time)MINUTES TO *] AND consumers:[1 TO *] AND
: session_time_range_available:true)
you can't embed the valuef of a field inside a query string like that (the
What I'm questioning is whether the issue you see in 4.1 has been
resolved in Subversion. While I would not expect 4.0 to read a 4.1
index, the SVN branch/4.2 should be able to do so effortlessly.
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013, at 06:17 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Upa
Hi Manuel,
If you search "optimize" on this mailing list, you'll see that one of
the common suggestions is to avoid optimizing and fine-tune segment
merging instead. So to begin, take a look at your solrconfig.xml and
find out what your merge policy and mergeFactor are set to (note: they
may be co
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Can you use a checkout from SVN? Does that resolve your issues? That is
> what will become 4.2 when it is released soon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/
>
> Upayavira
>
Thank you. Which feature of 4.2 are you s
To properly set the default query operator to be AND, edit the /select
request handler and set q.op there, for example:
explicit
10
text
edismax
AND
If you want to override the default operator on a single request and it as a
simple parameter:
/select?q=woman+smile
Can you index every page as a separate doc (they can share a docID
across all pages, the Solr ID field is just docID+pageno), then use
highlighting to to get snippets, and use result grouping to group docs
based on their docid. That'll mean you'll have all pages from a single
document grouped toget
if you increase the granularity of your document in index to a single page
instead of an entire pdf; it becomes an easy problem.
Your description states that you are not searching for a terms in a pdf but
instead you are searching for a term in a page from a pdf.
I assume you load the pdf externa
15 matches
Mail list logo
