Hi,
I got the exception *"Invalid Date String" *as I run the crawl against
webpages .
*
*
Each one use their own date format and as a developer we don't have a
control on it. Instead of throwing exception, It should suppose to convert
into a Solr based format .
Can you suggest me how do I overcom
Hi Peyman,
Right, it's exactly the opposite of what you want - faceting is done on all
matches and carrot2 tends to be fed top N matches.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Feb 22, 2013 12:34 PM, "Peyman Faratin" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would to run a mlt search (in Solrj) of a
Hello,
I was unable to change pre and post tags for highlighting when
usefastVectorHighlighter is set to true. Changing default tags in
solrconfig.xml works for standard highlighter though. I searched mailing list
and the net with no success.
I use solr-4.1.0.
Thanks.
Alex.
You could copy each shard to a single node and then use the merge index feature
to merge them into one index and then start up a single Solr node on that. Use
the same configs.
- Mark
On Feb 22, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Erol Akarsu wrote:
> I have a solr cloud 7 nodes, each has 2 shards.
> Now, I wo
It just means at some point a replication was done that required flipping to a
new directory. It's expected. Once you flip from the index directory to an
index. directory, you never go back.
- Mark
On Feb 22, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mingfeng Yang wrote:
> I see the items under my solorcloud data di
I see the items under my solorcloud data directory of "replica node" as
drwxr-xr-x 2 solr solr42 Feb 22 18:19 index
drwxr-xr-x 2 solr solr 12288 Feb 23 01:00 index.20130222181947835
-rw-r--r-- 1 solr solr78 Feb 22 18:25 index.properties
-rw-r--r-- 1 solr solr 209 Feb 22 18:25 replication
Yeah, exactly - although there are workarounds, this is probably worth a
feature request whether or not it is turned down.
I have created these 2 new feature requests (after not being able to find
duplicates through searching):
1) Please add support for manual leader election/promotion:
https:
Michael,
I don't think you misunderstood. I will soon give a full response here, but
am on the road at the moment.
Many thanks
Jack
On Friday, February 22, 2013, Michael Della Bitta <
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com> wrote:
> My mistake, I misunderstood the problem.
>
> Michael Della Bitta
>
>
My mistake, I misunderstood the problem.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : If you'r
: If you're submitting documents as XML, you're always going to have to
: escape meaningful XML characters going in. If you ask for them back as
: XML, you should be prepared to unescape special XML characters as
that still wouldn't explain the discrepency he's claiming to see between
the json &
Hi Jack,
If you're submitting documents as XML, you're always going to have to
escape meaningful XML characters going in. If you ask for them back as
XML, you should be prepared to unescape special XML characters as
output. Same goes for JSON, etc. There's really no way around this...
it's just a
I have a multi-value stored field called "details"
I've been deliberately sending it values like
If I fetch a document with that field at the admin query console,
using XML, I get:
If I fetch with JSON, I get:
"details": [
""
],
Even more curious, if I
i think the use case here is more of a management one.
-wanting to explicitly configure a specific node as leader (the
reasons for this could vary)
-wanting to gracefully/safely move a leader role from a specific node
without going thru an actual election process (as was mentioned
previously, why
Yes, that's a good solution to this whole Cloud/DC issue (which seems to
have cropped up several times), you have one of the ZK instances "external"
to the cloud. You can lose any 1 machine, and the others are still ok.
The next level would be a Cloud of 3 servers + 2 external ZKs, that would
We had something similar to be fair, a cluster information field which was
unfortunately optional, so all the documents that didn't have this field set
grouped together.
It isn't Solr's fault, to be fair, we told it to group on the values of
field Z, null is a valid value and lots of documents
Thanks Mark,
Sounds good. We are still at the load test stage and will see how this goes. I
imagine this is more of a concerning in concept than in reality. :)
Cheers,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:52 PM
To:
Thanks for all your help. I was able to get my test environment in and
tested with just the document that I was searching.
I was able to figure out the analyzer and found that the index_synonyms file
was used improperly and it caused solr to generate the wrong terms for the
data it was given.
Hi,
What if you add new collection to solr.xml file?
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Shankar Sundararaju
To: solr-user
Sent: Thu, Feb 21, 2013 8:51 pm
Subject: How do I create two collections on the same cluster?
I am using Solr 4.1.
I created collection1 consisting of 2 lea
Thank you Shawn. Neither using ip address nor maxShardsPerNode=1 has any
effect. Let me try few other things today and I'll get back to you.
-Shankar
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/21/2013 9:50 PM, Shankar Sundararaju wrote:
>
>> I am using Solr 4.1.
>>
>> I creat
On 2/22/2013 9:02 AM, jimtronic wrote:
Yes, these are good points. I'm using solr to leverage user preference data
and I need that data available real time. SQL just can't do the kind of
things I'm able to do in solr, so I have to wait until the write (a user
action, a user preference, etc) gets
Hi
I would to run a mlt search (in Solrj) of a short piece of text delivered via
the stream.body. This part works. What I would like to be able to do is to do 2
things:
- faceting on some number (not ALL) of the results
- cluster (using carrot2) all of the results
Is this possible? I believe f
Hi Vinay,
Perhaps you could say more about what you are looking for? What use cases, say.
Did you see the book _Taming Text_?
Thanks
Jack
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Vinay B, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few questions, some specific to UIMA, others more general.
> 1. The SOLR/UIMA example employs 3r
OK I'm sorry if I did not explained well my need. I'll try to give a
better explanation.
What I have : Millions of documents that have a field X , another field
Y and another field Z which is not required (So it can be empty in some
documents and not in others).
What I want to do : Search fo
On 22 February 2013 21:32, jimtronic wrote:
> Yes, these are good points. I'm using solr to leverage user preference data
> and I need that data available real time. SQL just can't do the kind of
> things I'm able to do in solr, so I have to wait until the write (a user
> action, a user preference
Yes, these are good points. I'm using solr to leverage user preference data
and I need that data available real time. SQL just can't do the kind of
things I'm able to do in solr, so I have to wait until the write (a user
action, a user preference, etc) gets to solr from the db anyway.
I'm kind of
What?!?! You want them grouped but not grouped together?? What on earth does
that mean?! I mean, either they are included or they are not. All results
will be in some group, so where exactly do you want these "not to be grouped
together" documents to be grouped? In any case, please clarify what
On 22 February 2013 12:11, cveres wrote:
> I should also add that some of the books don't have chapters, so the query
> won't succeed for these books.
> But in this case I expected that the document won't be added at all ..
> rather than first added then deleted (which I am now suspecting is the
>
Thank you Johannes, but I want the documents having the field empty to
be included in the results, just not to be grouped together, and if I
understood your solution correctly, it will simply remove those
documents from the results (Note : The field values are very variable
and unknown to me).
On 2/22/2013 4:57 AM, ipuskaric wrote:
I need two Solr servers, both acting as 'real' Master.
They need to be able to receive updates and to be used for querying, because
when one server is down, second has to be able to work alone... and when the
second is up again he needs to synchronize with f
Hi Oussama,
If you have only a few distinct, unchanging values in the field that you group
upon, you could implement a FilterQuery (query parameter "fq") and add it to
the query, allowing all valid values, but not an empty field. For example:
fq=my_grouping_string_field:( value_a OR value_b OR
We are fixing this bug here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4471
- Mark
On Feb 22, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Artyom wrote:
> I have the same problem. This bug appeared in 4.0 rarely, but 4.1 downloads
> the full index every time.
>
On 22 February 2013 12:40, Pawankumar Rote
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> One of our client has purchased SOLR extension. We have integrated it with
> mageno community edition. We are facing below issues.
>
> 1] On click of search box pop up appears - it is ok. But the price displayed
> against the product n
Look at solr/CHANGES.txt, the upgrade from 3.6 to 4.0-ALPHA section.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:33 PM, michaelweica wrote:
> thanks
>
> we do have 1 master , 5 slave servers. and we use slave as production
> server.
> we just update master index file when we have new contents
>
> n
Hi Erick,
Funnily enough, I cracked it about 5 minutes before your email arrived! Problem
was using WhiteSpaceTokenizer instead of Standard AND had the LowerCaseFilter
after the PorterStemmingFilter. Getting them in the right order has solved all
the problems and we get all our engineer boots,
Basically a hash is performed (details I'm not entirely sure about) and the
doc is sent to shard (hashed id)%(num shards). Really, though, I'm not sure
there's a good reason to dig into the details other than curiosity.
If you change the number of shards, you'll get into trouble. All that said
OK, let's see the debug data for explainOther.
One thing, though. Your analysis chain is apt to be surprising. The fact
that you have 222 terms with the ":" says that you're probably not getting
what I'd guess you want. That ':' is part of your token, and will not match
"engineering", consider cha
I have the same problem. This bug appeared in 4.0 rarely, but 4.1 downloads
the full index every time.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Slaves-always-replicate-entire-index-Index-versions-tp4041256p4042209.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Jack,
I didn't know this concept, but indeed, it seems like a good way to
define our application, and also opens possibilities of improvement.
Thanks for the link!
Best regards,
Marcelo.
2013/2/21 Jack Park
> Marcelo
>
> In some sense, it sounds like you are aiming at building a topic
I need two Solr servers, both acting as 'real' Master.
They need to be able to receive updates and to be used for querying, because
when one server is down, second has to be able to work alone... and when the
second is up again he needs to synchronize with first one.
As I understand the best way
Hi,
I need to group some results in solr based on a field, but I don't want
documents having that field empty to be grouped together, does anyone
know how to achieve that ?
--
Oussama Jilal
I am using Solr4.1.0(using original solrconfig.xml) + Lily1.3 + CDH4
>From solrconfig.xml, it says:
maxFieldLength was removed in 4.0. To get similar behavior,
include a LimitTokenCountFilterFactory in your fieldType definition.
E.g.
But it doesn't work whatever I set the value of m
Amit Nithian wrote
> For your issue above in your last post, is it possible that there was a
> commit on the master in that slight window after solr checks for the
> latest
> generation of the master but before it downloads the actual files? How
> frequent are the commits on your master?
No, I don
42 matches
Mail list logo
