Why would "other nodes obviously won't be able to talk to this tmp node"?
Can you elaborate?
Mark Miller-3 wrote
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4078 will be useful - that
> should make it in 4.3.
>
> Until then, you want to get that node out, and you need the new node to be
> assig
On 2/6/2013 8:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
Hello,
When I CTRL-C the example Solr, it prints a bunch of graceful shutdown
messages. I assume it shuts down safe and without corruption issues.
When I do that to Solrj (embedded, not remote), it just drops dead.
I found CoreContainer.shutdo
Thanks Gregg - can you file a JIRA issue?
- Mark
On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Gregg Donovan wrote:
> Mark-
>
> You're right that SolrCore#getIndexDir() did not directly read
> index.properties in 3.6. In 3.6, it gets it indirectly from what is passed
> to the constructor of SolrIndexSearcher. H
It is difficult to say for sure - unless somebody actually does a lot of
benchmarking tests with various distributions of data in the fields and
various field types (e.g., some are strings and some are text, and the
cardinality of the string values.) I would suspect that the two would be
roughl
The latter, I believe, but you lose the ability to give different weights
to matches on different fields.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Feb 6, 2013 2:34 PM, "adm1n" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's assume I have to search for a string (textField) in 6-7 different
> fields (us
Mark-
You're right that SolrCore#getIndexDir() did not directly read
index.properties in 3.6. In 3.6, it gets it indirectly from what is passed
to the constructor of SolrIndexSearcher. Here's SolrCore#getIndexDir() in
3.6:
public String getIndexDir() {
synchronized (searcherLock) {
if
Hi solr-user,
In my work i have to do multi facet select. we have already configured
facet fields globally in default request handler(solrconfig.xml). For multi
facet select i have done the query with exclusion filter. But it's not
working. The following is my query.
http://192.168.101.141:80
On Feb 6, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Gregg Donovan wrote:
> code we had that relied on the 3.6 behavior of SolrCore#getIndexDir() is
> not working the same way.
Can you be very specific about the different behavior that you are seeing? What
exactly where you seeing and counting on and what are you seei
I think you must be confused?
Solr 3.6 and before worked the same way - getIndexDir never read the props file
- getNewIndexDir always did. This was added when replication was added as far
as I remember.
The idea is that you use that when constructing new searcher/writers but you
shouldn't need
Solr Atomic update requires all fields to be stored. Were they?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be wor
In the process of upgrading from 3.6 to 4.1, we've noticed that much of the
code we had that relied on the 3.6 behavior of SolrCore#getIndexDir() is
not working the same way.
In 3.6, SolrCore#getIndexDir() would get us the index directory read from
index.properties, if it existed, otherwise it wou
Also, OR is the default, so you can improve on it with:
&fq=institute_name:("xyz" "sfsda" "sdfsaf")
Upayavira
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013, at 08:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/6/2013 12:41 PM, anurag.jain wrote:
> > in my query there are many OR's now after 79 or 80 ORS it gives error that
> > url is
On 2/6/2013 12:41 PM, anurag.jain wrote:
in my query there are many OR's now after 79 or 80 ORS it gives error that
url is very large.
http://xvz/solr/select?q=*:*&fq=institute_name:"xyz"; OR
institute_name:"sfsda" OR institute_name:"sdfsaf" ..
i found a solution that we can give query th
in my query there are many OR's now after 79 or 80 ORS it gives error that
url is very large.
http://xvz/solr/select?q=*:*&fq=institute_name:"xyz"; OR
institute_name:"sfsda" OR institute_name:"sdfsaf" ..
i found a solution that we can give query through POST. but i don't know how
? can yo
Btw wouldn't this be a chance to create a solr cli tool, much like
es2unix? Maybe with a shell? I'm off-line now, but I recently came across
a java lib that makes this easy... jclam jsomething ...
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Feb 6, 2013 8:48 AM, "Jan Høydahl" wrote:
Hi, Thanks for reply.
But i was doing same thing but whenver i tried to update previous field
automatically delete. :(
I am not getting why ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Updating-data-tp4038492p4038833.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
Hi,
Let's assume I have to search for a string (textField) in 6-7 different
fields (username, firstname, lastname, etc). Which one will have better
performance:
username:test OR firstname:test OR lastname:test
or defining some copyField and searching within it like somecopyfield:test
thanks.
Hi all,
I have noticed the following occur with some consistency: When I execute a long
running query (that spans 15 or more seconds), the Solr node that is servicing
the request starts to perform a full copy from the shard leader. My current
configuration has only one shard with 3 replicas. No
Hi,
We are replacing the search and indexing module in an application from
DtSearch to Solr using solrnet as the .net Solr client library.
We are relatively new to Solr/Lucene and would need some help/direction to
understand the more advanced search options in Solr.
The current applicat
This is perfect, thanks! I'm surprised it eluded me for so long.
From: Mark Miller [markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Correct way for getting SolrCore?
The SolrCoreAware interface?
Marcos,
The later 3 errors are common and won't pose a problem unless you
intend to reload the Solr application without restarting Geronimo
often.
The first error, however, shouldn't happen. Have you changed the size
of PermGen at all? I noticed this error while testing Solr 4.0 in
Tomcat, but ha
It turns out that all our fields are stored and restoring from the
source data is a bit of problem. I've tried DIH/SorEntityProcessor and
it seems to be working out good, so I'll probably end up using it.
Thank you!
--
Warm regards,
Artem Karpenko
On 04.02.2013 19:58, Lance Norskog wrote:
A s
Try q=*:*&group=true&group.field=cat&group.ngroups=true
On 2/4/13 3:53 AM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to get the distinct count of a given facet field in Solr?
A query like this q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=cat display the counts of all
the unique categories present like
ele
With dependencies I meant external jar dependencies. Perhaps extensions could
have deps while leaving the "core" compilable without?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
5. feb. 2013 kl. 17:10 skrev Upayavira :
> By depe
It is working but I come across another problem. I am expecting same
parsedquery in the following two approaches but I am not getting it as same
Approach 1:
BooleanQuery myQuery = new BooleanQuery();
myQuery.add(new TermQuery(new Term("PATIENT_GENDER", "Male")),
BooleanClause.Occur
You're not missing anything that I know of. The best I've been able to come
up with so far is to treat the disparate DCs as separate clusters. Your
ingestion process needs to know enough to send updates to both DCs but
that's the only point of contact.
The problem I see here is not only with inter
Hi,
I'm deploying the SOLR war in Geronimo, with multiple cores. I'm seeing the
following issue and it eats up a lot of memory when shutting down. Has
anyone seen this and have an idea how to solve it?
Exception in thread "DefaultThreadPool 196" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError:
PermGen space
2013-02-0
Hi all,
I found a solution myself - to replace - < > with < and >
Thanks & Regards
Rajani
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Rajani Maski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have few *dynamic field names* coming with special character. ex: *
> _str*. Solr throws error:* org.apache.solr.common.So
Hi
I found a solution. I am going to Configured Update Request
Processors, that I have seen in:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
If I developed a custom class extend UpdateRequestProcessorFactory,
I'll have access to :
* SolrQueryRequest req. (Object request)
* Sol
hi
thanks but I think this one is for ms sql not for mysql
regards
Rohan
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:53 AM, jp wrote:
> The following link provides on using external activator for tracking DB
> changes
> http://ajitananthram.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/auditing-external-activator/
>
> --JP
>
>
Hi,
We're getting the following trace for some Dismax queries that contain
non-alphanumerics:
Feb 6, 2013 10:06:56 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: null:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/lucene/search/UnionDocsAndPositionsEnum
at
31 matches
Mail list logo
