can you paste the content of solr.xml
On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Shaveta_Chawla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had solr3.6 installed on my system, now i am migrating my solr3.6 to
> solr4.0. but i am getting the error
>
> SEVERE: Unable to create core: collection1
> java.io.IOException: Can't find resourc
Hi,
I had solr3.6 installed on my system, now i am migrating my solr3.6 to
solr4.0. but i am getting the error
SEVERE: Unable to create core: collection1
java.io.IOException: Can't find resource 'solrconfig.xml' in classpath or
'solr/collection1/conf/', cwd=/opt/tomcat/bin
i don't know how to r
Thanks Jack!
It helps a lots.
Floyd
2012/12/4 Jack Krupansky
> "bf" is processed first, then "boost".
>
> All the bf's will be added, then the resulting scores will be boosted by
> the product of all the "boost" function queries.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Floy
That's only one example, there are others,
stream.body=blah. or
id:*
Jack's comment is well taken, consider a real middleware application.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo wrote:
> >
> >
> > Note that Velocity _can_ be used for user-facing code, but be very sure
> you
"bf" is processed first, then "boost".
All the bf's will be added, then the resulting scores will be boosted by the
product of all the "boost" function queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Floyd Wu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
haha, makes perfect sense! Thanks a lot!
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> "CoSt" was split into two terms and the query parser generated an OR of
> them. Adding the autoGeneratePhraseQueries="**true" attribute to your
> field type should fix the problem.
>
> You can also ch
"CoSt" was split into two terms and the query parser generated an OR of
them. Adding the autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true" attribute to your field
type should fix the problem.
You can also change splitOnCaseChange="1" to splitOnCaseChange="0" to avoid
the term splitting issue.
Be sure to comp
Yonik Seeley-4 wrote
> It's an internal implementation detail of distributed search - the
> second phase selects specific ids on each shard via the "ids"
> parameter.
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucidworks.com
so i suppose it us unique field? or it depends on which field we are using
for querying on shar
I have a search like this:
When I query "COST", it gives reasonable results (n1);
When I query "CoSt", however, it gives me n2 (>n1) results, and I can't
locate actual
Hi there,
I'm not sure if I understand this clearly.
'bf' is that final score will be add some value return by bf?
for example-> score + bf = final score
'boost' is that score will be multiply with value that return by boost?
for example-> score * boost = final score
When using both( 'bf' and
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:55 PM, deniz wrote:
> Hello, as it is clear in the title too, i wanna know for what solr uses this
> parameter... i see it on a sharding env on cloud, so i guess it is related
> with cloud but still there is no explanation about it in any of wiki pages
> that i have check
Hello, as it is clear in the title too, i wanna know for what solr uses this
parameter... i see it on a sharding env on cloud, so i guess it is related
with cloud but still there is no explanation about it in any of wiki pages
that i have checked... can someone explain the usage and aim of this
par
It is annoying to have to repeat these explanations so much.
Any serious objection to removing the VW UI from Solr proper and replacing
it with a standalone app?
I mean, Solr should have PHP, python, Java, and ruby example apps, right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Iwan
> Has anyone had any experience repackaging the solr war for osgi? And while
> I'm at it, has anyone done this in geronimo 3.0?
>
>
Hi Marcos,
Start glassfish web server.
Put solr war file inside the autodeploy folder.
Finally, you need to find the solr home folder location.
Different operating sy
>
>
> Note that Velocity _can_ be used for user-facing code, but be very sure you
> secure your Solr. If you allow direct access, a user can easily enter
> something like http://
> /update?commit=true&stream.body=*:*.
> And all your documents will be gone.
>
> Hi Erickson,
Thank you for the input.
Hi Stanislaw,
I see. Thank you for the reference.
Kind regards,
Hanjoyo
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Stanislaw Osinski
wrote:
> > I mean measuring the similarity between the document in each cluster.
> > Also, difference between document on one cluster with another cluster.
> >
> > I saw t
On 11/8/2012 3:25 PM, Dyer, James wrote:
Could this be a side-effect from SOLR-4019, in branch_4.0 this was commit r1405894 ?
Prior to this commit, PingRequestHandler would throw a SolrException for 503/Bad Request.
The change is that the exception isn't actually thrown but rather sent in pla
Ah! You have conflicting tokenizers in your index and query analyzers. They
should be the same.
Your index has:
Your query has:
That has the effect of treating the entire query term as one index term.
That actually works for simple terms, but a quoted phrase is passed to the
query analy
On 12/3/2012 1:44 PM, Erol Akarsu wrote:
I tried as search query not "baş" but "features:baş" in field "q" in SOLR
GUI. And, I got result!
In the one document, I had some fields type of text_eng, text_general and
one field features type of text_tr. If I don't specify field name, SOLR use
Engli
Hi,
Has anyone had any experience repackaging the solr war for osgi? And while I'm
at it, has anyone done this in geronimo 3.0?
Regards,
Marcos
As I pointed out in my message, your query is indicating that "text" is your
default search field. So, either choose a different default search field, or
assure that the "text" field has the desired field type.
If you want to change the default search field, eEither use a "df" request
paramete
Jack,
I see interesting stuff here now.
I tried as search query not "baş" but "features:baş" in field "q" in SOLR
GUI. And, I got result!
In the one document, I had some fields type of text_eng, text_general and
one field features type of text_tr. If I don't specify field name, SOLR use
Englis
I'm trying to using to search though news websites, but I was interested in
classification on index time, is there any available solution for this?
Greetings!
On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Stanislaw Osinski wrote:
>> I mean measuring the similarity between the document in each cluster.
>> Also,
Jack thank you again,
however we have the major problem that using QUOTES to bring "phrase"
results, actually does not bring any results AT ALL!
I mentioned this at the initial post, that we also used these:
fq=search_field:"check this"
fq=search_field:'check this'
But no results appear when q
Jack,
I have these in schema.xml that defines "features" as type of text_tr
But unfortunately, this fails.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Ah! See where it sa
Ah! See where it says "text:baş"?
Your query is against the "text" field, which probably doesn't have the
Turkish analysis.
There is probably a copyField from "features" to "text". You use the
"text_tr" field type for "features", but probably not for the "text" field.
-- Jack Krupansky
Jack,
I have already set tomcat server fro UTF-Encoding before. I have added
URIEncoding="UTF-8" to all elements in server.xml in Tomcat
7.
As you see below, when I search word "baş" with debug mode I can see
empty response. But when I search word "baştan", I can get correct
response.
It see
On 12/3/2012 9:47 AM, Andy D'Arcy Jewell wrote:
However, wouldn't re-creating the index on a large dataset take an
inordinate amount of time? The system I will be backing up is likely
to undergo rapid development and thus schema changes, so I need some
kind of insurance against corruption if we
The edismax "phrase boost" feature boosts the phrase IF it occurs - it's
optional.
If you want Solr to search ONLY by whole phrase, Solr does have a precise
way to request that - simply enclose the phrase in quotes. But I presume
that you knew that.
You can certainly preprocess your query to
> I mean measuring the similarity between the document in each cluster.
> Also, difference between document on one cluster with another cluster.
>
> I saw the sample code ClusteringQualityBencmark.java
> However, I do not know how to make use of it for assessing my Solr
> Clustering performance.
>
Two points:
1. Possibly an encoding problem with your container? Is UTF-8 encoding
enabled?
2. Add &debugQuery=true to your query (from the browser) and see if the
parser_query has the expected term that matches what Luke reports for the
index and what Solr Admin Analysis also reports for inde
They are the '\0' character.
what is a marker?
Gettting the following with a wget
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [application/xml]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> What mime type you get for binary files? Maybe server is misconf
If you use the edismax query parser and set the "pf", "pf2", and "pf3"
fields your phrases should show up as top results. This will not eliminate
non-phrase matches, but will assure that phrase matches get boosted.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#pf_.28Phrase_Fields.29
-- Jack
As Jack suggested, show the results of adding &debugQuery=on, it'll help us
help you. Particularly with this form: q=search_field:"check this". It
should be doing what you want.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:37 AM, NickA wrote:
> Thank you Jack,
>
> the problem with the "AND" is that it
It _seems_ like just adding "phrase fields" (qf) to your edismax defaults
gets you close. It would have the problem of matching if the field were
longer... but it might be "close enough".
Otherwise, why not just add in fq clauses on your exact fields? Because one
problem you'll have is that you ne
On 03/12/12 16:39, Erick Erickson wrote:
There's no real need to do what you ask.
First thing is that you should always be prepared, in the worst-case
scenario, to regenerate your entire index.
That said, perhaps the easiest way to back up Solr is just to use
master/slave replication. Consider
There's no real need to do what you ask.
First thing is that you should always be prepared, in the worst-case
scenario, to regenerate your entire index.
That said, perhaps the easiest way to back up Solr is just to use
master/slave replication. Consider having a machine that's a slave to the
mast
Thank you Jack,
the problem with the "AND" is that it does not search for a PHRASE but for
the 2 words being SOMEWHERE in the article.
For example the "Check this" will NOT search for "Check this" as a PHRASE
but for the "Check" word and the "this" word somewhere in the article, even
far away the
Jack,
Yes.
I expect SOLR should give same search results as Luked does.
Term analyzer gives correct answer in SOLR as expected. But SOLR does not
return correct search results.
I don't know why.
Erol Akarsu
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> So, does that highlight the
Adding to what Iwan said, I want to be sure you're not confusing
prototyping with a full-fledged application. The Velocity code included is
mostly intended as a rapid-prototyping vehicle. There are significant
security issues if you try to use it as your user-facing application, be
sure you trust y
not that I know of. Also, your performance will be much better if you can
denormlized the data.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Vikash Sharma wrote:
> Hi Erick,
> One more thing: So is there any other way to get the result?
> I mean, I need to get both parent and child document in/not nested f
So, does that highlight the problem for you or not? Is the term analyzed as you
expected?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 8:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results
Jack,
Thanks for help.
I removed d
The OR behavior is because the default operator is OR. You can change that
by setting q.op=AND.
Try the quoted phrases again, but with &debugQuery=true to see what query is
actually generated.
Finally, if you remove stop words at index time, then you must remove them
at query time as well.
Okay, so the bottom line here is that you wish to change the semantics of
quoted phrases. Fine, that's your prerogative, but a change in semantics
would require a change to the query parser, or as you originally indicated,
a pre-processor. It does sound as if a pre-processor is the way to go her
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62332
There is a fork with patches applied.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Arkadi Colson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Anyone tested the pecl Solr Client in combination with SolrCloud? I seems
> to be broken since 4.0
>
> Best regard
> Arkadi
>
>
Hi
Anyone tested the pecl Solr Client in combination with SolrCloud? I
seems to be broken since 4.0
Best regard
Arkadi
Hi Stanislaw,
I mean measuring the similarity between the document in each cluster.
Also, difference between document on one cluster with another cluster.
I saw the sample code ClusteringQualityBencmark.java
However, I do not know how to make use of it for assessing my Solr
Clustering performance
Hi all.
I'm new to SolR, and I have recently had to set up a SolR server running
4.0.
I've been searching for info on backing it up, but all I've managed to
come up with is "it'll be different" or "you'll be able to do push
replication" or using http and the command=backup parameter, which
Jack,
Thanks for help.
I removed data folder of SOLR and indexed this sample doc from scratch,
there was no document in SOLR but only one.
When I analysed , I can see stemming is correct and I can see these for
words "bul", "baş" ,"gör" and "umut" in SF row
I attached analyse screens
Erol Akar
Hello,
I am trying to achieve searching with a phrase in SOLR. Specifically I have
the following field in my schema:
Also (as a second similar problem) in the “synonyms.txt” I have values like
these:
> Was the picture generated using Lingo 3G algorihtms?
> I saw some sub-clusters inside it.
> Nice pic :)
>
That is correct.
I am interested to learn it.
> How long is the Lingo 3G trial period?
>
I'll send you the details in a private e-mail in a second.
> Is there any way to programmatical
Hi Romita,
In my opinion, if you are new to Solr, you can start learning from Solritas.
Solritas uses Apache Velocity, a templating language, CSS and JQuery to
manage it looks and behavior.
Besides that you can write a custom SearchComponent inside the /browse
SearchHandler
to add more functionali
Hi Stanislaw Osinski,
Was the picture generated using Lingo 3G algorihtms?
I saw some sub-clusters inside it.
Nice pic :)
I am interested to learn it.
How long is the Lingo 3G trial period?
Is there any way to programmatically measure the performance of Carrot2
clustering algorithm?
thanx
cheer
Hi Stanislaw Osinski,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Stanislaw Osinski wrote:
> One of our clients uses Solr's search results clustering for grouping news.
> Instead of the default Carrot2 algorithm that ships with Solr they use a
> commercial one, but Carrot2 should give you decent clusters to
across-the-board case-senstive indexing is not what I want...
Let me make sure I understand your suggestion:
And define content1 as text1, content2 as text2?
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
> Solr index is cas
One of our clients uses Solr's search results clustering for grouping news.
Instead of the default Carrot2 algorithm that ships with Solr they use a
commercial one, but Carrot2 should give you decent clusters too. Here's an
example clustering result:
http://imagebin.org/238001
Staszek
--
Stanisl
Never mind I think I found it.
There must be some documents into each shardso they havea version
number. Then everything seems to work...
On 11/30/2012 04:57 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Thanks for all the detailed info!
Yes, that is confusing. One of the sore points we have while supporting both
Thanks for the explaination It's clear now...
I expanded the setup to:
4 hosts with 2 shards en 1 replicator for each shard. When I
shutdown tomcat on solr01-dcg which is the master of shard 1 for
both collections, the replicator (solr01-gs) seems NOT to
Hi,
the use case we have in mind is that we would like to achieve exact matches for
explicit phrases. Our users expect that an explicit phrase not only considers
the order of terms, but also the exact wording. Therefore if we search on
fields using a data type that is not meant performing exact
Hi,
I want to change the Solr UI. As far as i understand, Solritas is just for
prototyping, where I can change the UI according to a predefined template
(Velocity) and cannot add on any additional functionality to that page.
How can I change the Solr UI otherwise. Any guidance would be apprecia
Hi Erick,
One more thing: So is there any other way to get the result?
I mean, I need to get both parent and child document in/not nested format.
Regards,
Vikash
Regards,
Vikash Sharma
vikash0...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> That's the way joins work, and
Then the "URL" must be the same.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
> Sorry I didn't make it perfectly clear. The "id" field is URL.
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Xi Shen wrote:
> >
> >> If the va
Solr index is case-sensitive by default, unless you used the lower case
filter. I remember I saw this topic on Solr, and the solution is simple:
copy the filed;
use a new analyzer/tokenizer to process this field, and do not use lower
case filter
when query, make sure both fields are included.
O
63 matches
Mail list logo
