LucidFind collects several sources of information in one searchable archive:
http://find.searchhub.org/?q=&sort=#%2Fp%3Asolr
- Original Message -
| From: "Dmitry Kan"
| To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
| Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:24:21 AM
| Subject: Re: More references for configu
> This might make sense if you were using Solr to search for the
> ID of an object in the database with relations to other objects.
> However, if all you are doing is retrieving the file path/URL, why
> not index that into Solr, and get it directly from Solr?
That's what I'm doing right now but si
On 12 November 2012 13:00, 122jxgcn wrote:
[...]
> What I want to do right now is that whenever the client indexes document and
> uploads the raw file,
> database gets update with the pairs of (Document ID in Solr, path of the raw
> file inside server).
> So on search result page, instead of givin
Hello,
I'm currently working on file management system based on Solr.
What I have accomplished now is that I have Solr server and windows client
application that runs on different computers.
When the client indexes rich document to Solr server remotely, it also
uploads the file itself via FTP.
So
Nick - Sorry, embedded links are not shown in previous email. I'm mentioning
below.
> Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands
> (http://www.myjeeva.com/2012/10/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment/#handy-solrcloud-cli-commands)
> Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble
> (http://
Nick -
I believe you're experiencing a difficulties with SolrCloud CLI commands for
interacting ZooKeeper.
Please have a look on below links, it will provide you direction.
Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands
Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble
Cheers,
Jeeva
On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:45
Yes, we only need term overlap information to choose top candidates (we may
incorporate boost factor for different terms later but that's another
story).
we are quite new to solr so haven't really profiled the process. Is there
any rough guess on what could be expected latency from such cases? ou
more information, problem only happends when I have both sort by function and
grouping in query.
From: Kuai, Ben [ben.k...@sensis.com.au]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: sort by function error
Hi
I am tr
following is my config , it suggests words well .
i want to get a sorted result when it suggest, so i added a transformer ,
it will add a tab(\t) separated float weight string
to the end of the Suggestion field , but the suggestion result still does't
sorted correctly.
my suggest result( note the
anyone can help to tell me where is my mistake?
eyun
From: eyun
Date: 2012-11-12 11:24
To: solr-user-subscribe
Subject: how to sort the solr suggester's result
following is my config , it suggests words well .
i want to get a sorted result when it suggest, so i added a transformer , it
will
Why not group by cid using the grouping component, within the group sort by
version descending and return 1 result per group.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
Cheers
Amit
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:56 PM, dm_tim wrote:
> I think I may have found my answer buy I'd like additional vali
Jack,
I think the issue is that the ping which is used to determine whether or
not the server is live returns a seemingly false positive back to the load
balancer (and indirectly the client) that this server is ready to go when
in fact it's not. Reading this page (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr
Hi Lee,
So the query component would be a subclass of SearchComponent and you can
define the list of components executed during a search handler.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchComponent
I *think* you can have a custom component do what you want as long as it's
the first component in the list
Hi Steiner,
I found a video tutorial on Nutch 1.4 + Solr 3.4.0 (on Windows).
It do solve my error. Hope it do for yours too.
Here is the link:
Running Nutch and Solr on Windows Tutorial: Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baxhI6Wkov8
Running Nutch and Solr on Windows Tut
Looking at how we could upgrade some of our infrastructure to Solr 4.0
- I would really like to take advantage of distributed updates to get
NRT, but we want to keep our fixed master and slave server roles since
we use different hardware appropriate to the different roles.
Looking at the solr 4.0
On 11/11/2012 04:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Nick Chase wrote:
So I'm trying to use ZkCLI without success. I DID start and stop Solr in
non-cloud mode, so everything is extracted and it IS finding zookeeper*.jar.
However, now it's NOT finding SolrJ.
Not sure a
When SolrCloud is in a steady state (eg the number of nodes in the
cluster is not changing and config is not changing), Solr does not
really talk to ZooKeeper other than really light stuff like a heartbeat
and maintaining a connection. So performance is not likely a large
concern here.
Mostly
let me see if i get this correctly,
greater the no.of zookeeper nodes , more the time it takes to come to a
consensus.
During an indexing operation, how many times does a solr client needs to
contact zookeeper for consensus ?
- per docs ? per commit ? ?
thanks,
Ani
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:1
Hi,
On 8 Nov 2012, at 15:00, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hm, i copied the schema from Nutch' trunk verbatim and only had to change the
> stemmer. It seems like you have, for some reason, a float with an extra
> point dangling around somewhere. Can you check?
Just building a Nutch 1.5.1 environmen
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Nick Chase wrote:
> So I'm trying to use ZkCLI without success. I DID start and stop Solr in
> non-cloud mode, so everything is extracted and it IS finding zookeeper*.jar.
> However, now it's NOT finding SolrJ.
Not sure about your specific problem in this case,
OK, so this is my ZooKeeper week, sorry. :)
So I'm trying to use ZkCLI without success. I DID start and stop Solr
in non-cloud mode, so everything is extracted and it IS finding
zookeeper*.jar. However, now it's NOT finding SolrJ.
I even tried to run it from the provided script (in cloud-sc
Thanks, Jack, this is a great explanation! And since a greater number
of ZK nodes tends to degrade write performance, that would be a factor
in making every Solr node a ZK node as well. Much obliged!
Nick
On 11/11/2012 10:45 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
"Production" typically implies "hi
Is the issue here that the Solr node is continuously "live" with the load
balancer so that the moment during startup that Solr can respond to
anything, the load balancer will be sending it traffic and that this can
occur while Solr is still warming up?
First, shouldn't we be encouraging people
"Production" typically implies "high availability" and in a distributed
system the goal is that the overall cluster integrity and performance should
not be compromised just because a few "worker" nodes go down. Solr nodes do
a lot of complex operations and are quite prone to running into "issues
OK, I can't find a definitive answer on this. The wiki says not to use
the embedded ZooKeeper servers for production. But my question is: why
not? Basically, what are the reasons and circumstances that make you
better off using an external ZooKeeper ensemble?
Thanks...
Nick
Only slaves are public facing and they are read only, with limited query
request handlers defined. The above approach is to prevent abusive / in
appropriate queries by clients. A query component sounds interesting would
this be implemented through an interface so could be separate from solr or
woul
On 11 November 2012 15:06, tomw wrote:
[...]
> Thanks, that seems to work. Life can be so simple. Unfortunately this
> case isn't mentioned in any of the sections covering updates in the
> wiki.
While this could be made clearer, it should not be very difficult
to guess at the update URL for a spe
Hi,
here are some resources:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ (Solr wiki)
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/books.html (books published on Solr)
the goes googling on a specific topic. But before reading a book might not
be a bad idea..
-- Dmitry
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:15 PM, FARAHZADI, EMAD
wrote:
> Just use the update handler that is specific to a given core. For
> example if you have two cores named core1 and core2, you should use
> the following addresses (if you didn't change the default
> configuration):
>
> /solr/core1/update/
>
> and
>
> /solr/core2/update/
>
Thanks, that seems t
Hello!
Just use the update handler that is specific to a given core. For
example if you have two cores named core1 and core2, you should use
the following addresses (if you didn't change the default
configuration):
/solr/core1/update/
and
/solr/core2/update/
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :
Hi,
I 've set up a Solr instance with multiple cores to be able to use
different indexes for different applications. The point I'm struggling
with is how do I insert documents into the index running on a specific
core? Any clue appreciated.
best
--
tomw
31 matches
Mail list logo
