Hello!
Look at the field collapsing functionality -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
It allows you to group documents based on field value, query or
function query.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> Hi All,
> Curren
HI all,
I got a weird error while running tests on my solr... here is the log for
that error:
ERROR o.a.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter -
null:org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpOutput.write(HttpOutput.java:154)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpOutp
Hi,
The following is the example;
1st query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismax&&debugQuery=on&q=cashier2&qf=data^2
id&start=0&rows=11&fl=data,id
Next query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismax&&debugQuery=on&q=cashier2&qf=data
id^2&start=0&rows=11&fl=data
You didn't ask about this, but you'll want an odd number of zookeeper
nodes. Think voting.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 7, 2012 4:43 PM, "darul" wrote:
> Yes instanceDir attribute point to new created core (with no conf dir) so
> it
> is stranged...
>
> but loo
Those two values are used to specify the analyzer type you want. That can
be of two kinds, one for the indexer- the analyzer you specify analyzes the
input documents accordingly to build the index. The other one is for query,
it analyzes your query. Typically the specified analyzer for index and
qu
Hi,
Compare in what sense? An example will help.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 7, 2012 8:45 PM, "Romita Saha" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to record a search query in solr and then compare it with
> the previous search query?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> R
HI,
Can someone help me understand the meaning of and
in schema.xml, how they are used and what do I get back
when the values are not the same?
For example, given:
If I make the
You can debug this with the 'Analysis' page in the Solr UI. You pick
'text_general' and then give words with umlauts in the text box for indexing
and queries.
Lance
- Original Message -
| From: "Daniel Brügge"
| To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
| Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:45:4
Hi,
Yes, the new sort query worked!. Thank you for the quick response.
Thanks,
Indika
On 8 November 2012 04:31, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Ahhh, sorry. I see now. The function query you are specifying for the
> sort is not proper. Solr doesn't understand that part:
>
> exists(start_time:[*
Hello!
Ahhh, sorry. I see now. The function query you are specifying for the
sort is not proper. Solr doesn't understand that part:
exists(start_time:[* TO 1721] AND end_time:[1721 TO *])
try something like that:
sort=if(exists(query($innerQuery)),100,0)+desc&innerQuery={!edismax}(start_time:[*
Thanks for the response, I did append the sort order but the result was the
same,
Can't determine a Sort Order (asc or desc) in sort spec
'if(exists(start_time:[* TO 1721] AND end_time:[1721 TO *]),100,0) asc',
pos=23
Thanks,
Indika
On 8 November 2012 04:02, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Fro
Okay, thanks for the help guys... I *think* that this can be resolved by
kicking off the delta and passing optimize=false since the default was true in
3.3.
I'll post back if I see the issue pop back up.
JT
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Josh Turmel wrote:
> Here's what we have s
Hello!
From looking at your sort parameter it seems that you are missing the
order of sorting. The function query will return a value on which
Solr will sort and Solr needs to know if the documents should be
sorted in descending or ascending order. Try something like that:
sort=if(exists(start_ti
Yes instanceDir attribute point to new created core (with no conf dir) so it
is stranged...
but looks like I have played to much:
when I start main solr shard. I try everything again tomorrow and give you
feedback.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Testin
I have a cluster of 6 shards of Solr 4.0.0 deployed, one machine each, with no
replicas, and another single machine running a zookeeper ensemble of 5. Using
python sunburnt, I submit six documents with separate ids and populated text
fields and commit them. No errors are reported. When I search
Right. Solr uses zookeeper only for configuration information. The index
resides on the machines running solr.
bq: In my solr instances directory tree, /solr/mycollection/ sometimes I
have an "index" or "index.20121107185908378"
You can configure Solr to keep snapshots of indexes around under co
I reply to myself :
darul wrote
>
*
> Few questions:
*
> - my both zookeeper have their own data directory, as usual, but I did not
> see so much change inside after indexing examples docs. Are data stored
> their or just
/
> configuration (conf files)
/
> is stored in zookeeper ensemble ? Can
Hello everyone,
Having used *Hadoop* (not in charge of deployment, just java code part) and
*Solr 3.6* (deployment and coding) this year, today I made the solr cloud
wiki.
Well,
* I have deployed 2 zookeeper (not embedded) instances
* 2 solr instances with 2 shards (pointing to zookeeper nodes)
Why not do this in a ServletFilter? Alternatively, I'd just write a front
end application servlet to do this so that you don't firewall your internal
admins off from accessing the core Solr admin pages. I guess you could
solve this using some form of security but I don't know this well enough.
If
Here's what we have set in our data-config.xml
Thanks,
Josh Turmel
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/7/2012 10:55 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > It the last part really correct? Optimization should be doable while
> > updates are goin
Hi Jack,
It seems all the html tables in my original e-mail have been broken, sorry
about that.
Thanks for the ideas. You're very right that a compound word recognition
would be the way to pursue. Most probably this feature is domain dependent,
so implementing something generic might not satisfy
On 11/7/2012 10:55 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Shawn,
It the last part really correct? Optimization should be doable while
updates are going on... or am I missing something?
From what I recall when I was first putting my build system together,
which I will admit was on Solr 1.4.0, I could
A transaction log file is opened after a hard commit and it stays open
until a new hard commit is issued. Old tlogs are deleted, but always with
the premise of keeping enough updates "lines" of tlog to allow peer-sync
(currently, hardcoded to 100 updates). The recovery is made using the last
tlog (
Try specifying the "escape" parameter. This is the character your file uses to
escape delimiters occuring in the data. If this fixes your problem and if you
do not want to have to specify "escape", you can alter the patch, line 113:
change: (escape == '\\')
to: (escape !=null && escape == '\\'
i see... using the -t flag
it would be cool if TermsComponent had an option to sort by total term
frequency, something like
terms.sort={count|index|ttf}
surely that's a common enough use case
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Lucene's misc module has HighFreqTerms to
Hi,
Please confirm my subscription.
Regards,
Sachin
Hi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> > 1.If I have a solrcloud cluster with two shards and 0 replica on two
> > different server.
> > when one of server restarts will the solr instance on that server replay
> > the transaction log to make sure these operations pers
Lucene's misc module has HighFreqTerms tool.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Edward Garrett wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there a simple way to get a list of all terms that occur in a field
> sorted by their total term frequency within that field?
>
> Terms
hi,
is there a simple way to get a list of all terms that occur in a field
sorted by their total term frequency within that field?
TermsComponent (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent) "provides
fast field faceting over the whole index", but as counts it gives the
number of documents that e
Hi Shawn,
It the last part really correct? Optimization should be doable while
updates are going on... or am I missing something?
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:17
On 11/6/2012 2:01 PM, Josh Turmel wrote:
Running Solr 3.3
We're running into issues where deleting individual documents (by ID) will
timeout but it only seems to happen when our hourly delta index is being
ran to pull in new documents, is there a way to work around this?
Are you experiencing r
Hi,
i am running a SolrCloud cluster with the 4.0.0 version. I have a stopwords
file
which is in the correct encoding. It contains german Umlaute like e.g. 'ü'.
I am
also running a standalone Zookeeper which contains this stopwords file. In
my schema
i am using the stopwords file in the standard w
Thank you Erick for your reply. I understand that search is not an RDBMS.
Yes, we do have a huge combinatorial explosion if we de-normalize and
duplicate data. In fact, I believe our use case is exactly what the Solr
developers were trying to solve with the addition of the Join query. And
while
This is one of those areas of Solr where you can refine and make
improvements, as you have done, but never actually reach 100% satisfaction.
And, in some cases, as here, you have a choice of settings and no single
combination covers all cases.
In this case, you really need compound-term recogn
No - you need to restart Solr to pick up the changes to the schema and you need
to re-index the existing documents.
Regards,
André
Von: Andreas Niekler [aniek...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 16:40
An: solr-user@lucene.ap
Hello!
In my opinion, you are trying to use Solr as a complete and classic
database but the thing is that the best scenario where Solr rocks is just
for fast search data access. Thus, you just should index those data
candidate to be searched for. My personal suggestion is that you think
about how
James,
Thank you for you quick answer.
This is my data-config.xml file:
am I doing something wrong.
Cordialement.
__
Zakaria BENZIDALMAL
mobile: 06 31 40 04 33
2012/11/7 Dyer, James
> Zakaria,
>
> You might wa
With Solr, you would need to pre-compute any computations in query
expressions and index them for direct matching. So, you would need a field
which was indexed with the sum of the values of the other two fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: blopez
Sent: Wednesday, Novem
Zakaria,
You might want to post your data-config.xml, or at least the part that uses
SOLR-2549. If its throwing an NPE, it certaintly has a bug (if you're doing
something wrong, it would at least give you a sensible error message). Also,
unless you need to use DIH for some other reason, you m
Hello,
thanks for the advice. If i now change the schema that my lowercase
factory is before the stemmer. is the index updating itself after the
change? How could i achieve this. I stored all values within the index.
Thanks
andreas
Am 07.11.2012 10:47, schrieb André Widhani:
Do you use the
I do have the omit positions turned on...d'oh.
So if I cut those out, then the region (and other similar fields) should
work correctly?
Thanks Jack!
-- Chris
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Try the Solr Admin Analysis page to see how your phrase and input text are
> a
Try the Solr Admin Analysis page to see how your phrase and input text are
actually being analyzed. Also add &debugQuery=true to your query and see
what the "parsed" query looks like. And check to see that "North" and
"America" are not mentioned in either your stop words or synonyms.
Also, che
Please clarify. Be specific, with details.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: anasalkouz
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 5:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: omitTermFreq only?
Unfortunately, in Solr 4 all this omitTermFreqAndPositions not working
probably
You are probably thinking of SweetSpotSimilarity. You might also want to look
at pivoted document normalization.
wunder
On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
> wrote:
>> The name escapes me but Lucene used to have a special Similarity
Hi all,
Could some one provide a clear exemple using this Processor
(data-config.xml exemple)?
I run into this problem after patching and building my code:
GRAVE: Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerExcept
Well, you have a couple of issues here:
1> the nodes shard ID will have to be guaranteed to be the same as it was
when the shard was created.
2> you should be able to just copy the index directory to wherever your
node is looking for it now.
or
3> instanceDir should point to the directory that has
Unfortunately, in Solr 4 all this omitTermFreqAndPositions not working
probably
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/omitTermFreq-only-tp3167128p4018733.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
I'm facing some problems with solr fields at query time. Let's see a
simplified example.
I have the fields A, B and C. In a relational DB, it's possible to launch a
(let's say dynamically) query: SELECT * FROM wherever WHERE wherever.A +
wherever.B = wherever.C
I'm trying to do this in S
> 1.If I have a solrcloud cluster with two shards and 0 replica on two
> different server.
> when one of server restarts will the solr instance on that server replay
> the transaction log to make sure these operations persistent to the index
> files(commit the transaction log)?
>
Yes, the Solr i
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> The name escapes me but Lucene used to have a special Similarity impl for
> this sort of stuff. I think it's still there.
>
> We implemented a slightly better Similarity that used Gaussian distribution
> and was thus smoother. Try doing tha
The name escapes me but Lucene used to have a special Similarity impl for
this sort of stuff. I think it's still there.
We implemented a slightly better Similarity that used Gaussian distribution
and was thus smoother. Try doing that.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On No
Hi,
Somebody else may answer 1.
2. Yes you can remove 4th server if you have only 3 shards. I'm not 100%
certain if solr will never put 2 shards on the same server, so check what's
on the server before shutting it down.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 7, 2012 1:41
Latest news!
It was a simple bad spelling Tomcat issue in server.xml. I specified "utf8"
instead of "UTF-8". After that the problem was solved and everything is
O.K. However, I hope that this thread could be useful for someone because
this kind of latin encoding problems are very common.
Goodbye!
It works, thank you very much.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
> Hey Carlos
>
> This sounds a bit like a change which was made in SOLR-1770:
>
> Index: example/solr/solr.xml
> ===
> --- example/solr/solr.xml (r
Hello!
I´ve got some encoding problems with my currently new analyzer
configuration. I´ve deployed a Solr server in Apache Tomcat setting
Tomcat´s encoding to UTF-8 in server.xml. Also Solr´s encoding is setted to
UTF-8 in schema.xml. I have defined a fieldType like the following:
**
* *
* *
Do you use the LowerCaseFilterFactory filter in your analysis chain? You will
probably want to add it and if you aready have, make sure it is _before_ the
stemming filter so you get consistent results regardless of lower- or uppercase
spelling.
You can protect words from being subject to stemmi
Dear List,
i have an unwanted behavior with the German2 Stemmer. For example the
river Elbe:
If i input elbe - the word gets reduced to elb
If i input Elbe - everything is ok and elbe is stored to the index.
If i now query for elbe or Elbe i get of course differnt Results
allowing the users
Hi all,
Because we cannot add or remove shard when solrcloud cluster has been set
up,
so we have to predict a precise shard size at first, says we need 3 shards.
but now we have no enough servers to set up the cluster with one shard one
server.
In this situation, I have to set up the cluster
Hey Carlos
This sounds a bit like a change which was made in SOLR-1770:
Index: example/solr/solr.xml
===
--- example/solr/solr.xml (revision 909013)
+++ example/solr/solr.xml (working copy)
@@ -29,6 +29,6 @@
If 'null' (or absent), co
Hey,
I am new to solr and java. I am working on a project that involves the use
of both. I want to learn the complete process of indexing a text file using
solr. Also, I'd like to learn how to interpret the results.
i am looking for outputs like "number of occurrences of a particular word" .
P
60 matches
Mail list logo
