Hi,
I would like to get recommendation on zookeeper ensemble architecture. I
am thinking of following options, please let me know if I am correct in
pros and con of each option. Also please feel free to add differentiating
points I am missing.
1) Have separate boxes for zookeeper ensemble and all
Hi Erick,
You mentioned for 4.0 memory pattern is much difference than 3.X . Can you
elaborate whether its worse or better ? Does 4.0 tend to use more memory
for similar index size as compared to 3.X ?
Thanks
Varun
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, I haven't had exp
Well, I haven't had experience with JDK7, so I'll skip that part...
But about caches. First, as far as memory is concerned, be
sure to read Uwe's blog about MMapDirectory here:
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
As to the caches.
Be a little careful here. Get
Greetings,
I've recently moved to running some of our Solr (3.6.1) instances
using JDK 7u7 with the G1 GC (playing with max pauses in the 20 to
100ms range). By and large, it has been working well (or, perhaps I
should say that without requiring much tuning it works much better in
general than my
Fyi, block join query doesnt require denormalization, performant, but has
own limitations, of course. Many to many is the most painful point. I deal
with it but quite far from contributing generally applicable approach.
29.09.2012 5:21 пользователь "Biff Baxter"
написал:
> Hi Walter,
>
> I have
Here's the place to start:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
Erick
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:40 AM, darshan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone refer me few number blogs that explains both
> imports in little bit more detail and with examples.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darsha
there are certainly multiple ways,
now I found at least one:
in the 4.x package the configuration for the jetty-start.jar
expects the extension libraries in
lib/ext/*
(in 3.6 everything under lib/** was considered)
hope this helps save hours of desperation
to other lost souls (should there be
Thanks Shawn,that helps a lot .our current OS limit is set to 300,000+, I
guess, which is I heard is maximum for the OS .. not sure of the soft and
hard limits .Will check this .
Regards,
Sujatha
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/28/2012 12:43 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
