Thanks, I found GroupResponse was added in Solr 3.4 so I have to update
version :)
Roman
Dne 24.8.2012 18:09, Erick Erickson napsal(a):
3.6 has a getNGroups, does that do what you want?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Roman Slavík wrote:
Hi guys,
we are using SOLR 3.3 with Sol
Hi Erick
Thanks For reply.
My use case is I have 50 fields to index , but at the time of index all 50
fields data is unavailable.
So we have divided them in to 24 separate cores and indexing . we are using
shards for querying. But the problem is each core is having huge data. Total
size of all
ISO 8601.
The entire standards is rather complex, so most software uses a subset of it. A
useful subset is described here: http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
ISO 8601 does not allow "Z001" for milliseconds. The "Z" is for UTC (Zulu in
military time) and follows the time portion. Milliseconds (o
The timestamp format is 2012-01-01T01:01:01, with an optional Z001 for
milliseconds. The timezone is UTC. This is a standard format but I do
not remember the name of the standard.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Hasan Diwan wrote:
> Mr Norskong, et al,
>
> On 26 August 2012 14:37, Lance Norskog
Mr Norskong, et al,
On 26 August 2012 14:37, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Also, there is a logging feature to print intermediate values.
>
I see the data as it should be. It's just not recorded into SOLR. One
possible concern is that I have timestamp in epoch seconds, which I'd like
to store as a dat
Also, there is a logging feature to print intermediate values.
Another point is the complexity of your query. It can be easier to
test with the query as a database view, instead of embedding it in the
DIH script.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> That is not completely tr
Not really. The percentage given in other search packages is fairly
bogus. You have to do a global batch analysis of all of the index to
get a true scale for relevance.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Ramzi Alqrainy
wrote:
> You are right Mr.Ravish, because this depends on (ranking and search fi
How much memory is allocated? There is a feature in modern Unix
systems called 'Large Pages' or 'Huge Pages'. This is an operating
system feature to run very large processes with better virtual memory
tracking strategies inside the CPU RAM subsystem. Search for 'Large
Pages' and 'Translation Lookas
It is possible. Also, those settings are not saved across restarts.
You really should use a logging properties file.
Other ways to check on freezes:
1) run garbage collection logging or monitoring.
2) poll the statistics requesthandler and log.
3) poll the thread list and log.
On Fri, Aug 24, 201
I am unable to reproduce this scenario of all fields being highlighted. In
fact, from looking at the code, I don't see a way that could happen.
Further, the code, both 4.0-BETA and 3.6.1 as well as trunk, does NOT
support "glob" patterns within a comma/space-delimited list of fields. Only
a sin
You may want to take a look at the wiki for SolrCloud:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud/
But, you may just need a simple master-slave replication setup:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
SolrCloud is certainly preferred for large multi-shard, multi-replica
configurations, but tha
Multivalued fields come back in the order you index them. So you could
have a field named "filenames" and another field named "filecontents",
and as long as you indexed them both in the same order, they'd appear
in the results in the same order. So iterating over them would be like
iterating over t
> Hi. I'm looking for a tutorial on how
> to set up two cores for a Solr 4.0 Beta instance.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Both example-DIH and multicore can be used as an example.
cd solr/example
java -Dsolr.solr.home=example-DIH/solr -jar start.jar
java -Dsolr.solr.home=multicore -jar
I managed to narrow it down to the presence of dynamic field "*_custom_txt" in
the hl.fl list. If the list contains only regular fields the highlighting works
fine.
However, I also want to highlight some dynamic fields.
Is this a bug?
Thanks,
Yoni
-Original Message-
From: Yoni Amir [ma
More detail: So, when Solr returns results, we'd get XML that looks like this:
dkjfkjdfkjdkfj
kdjfkjdkfj
Sincerely,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Cougarman [mailto:acoug...@bwc.org]
Sent: 26 August 2012 10:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
I have a setup for /select handler which, regarding highlighting, looks roughly
like this:
edismax
all_text
...
id, module, identifier, type, category,
... , score
Hi. I'm looking for a tutorial on how to set up two cores for a Solr 4.0 Beta
instance. I've found this tutorial for earlier versions of Solr:
http://drupal.org/node/484800
Also, what are "Collections" in Solr 4? Are they related to cores? Thanks.
Sincerely,
Alex
Hi. We're using Solr 4.0 Beta. Is it possible to have a 2-dimensional array in
Solr schema? For example, you want to store this information in a field:
MyCustomField:
- Text
- FileName
So each text has a filename associated with it. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Alex
18 matches
Mail list logo
