Have you checked this date time format in Java code?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:42 PM, jayantu wrote:
> I have DIH for indexing RSS feeds. the problem is that the date format
> expected by solr is 1995-12-31T23:59:59Z while the way i see the date that
> comes in rss feed is 'Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:11
I have DIH for indexing RSS feeds. the problem is that the date format
expected by solr is 1995-12-31T23:59:59Z while the way i see the date that
comes in rss feed is 'Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:11:27 EDT' so I used the
dateTimeFormat transformer like this:
The filed "pubDate" is defined as type date in
Hello All,
I'm working to solve an interesting problem. The problem that I
have is that when I pull a server out of the cloud (to do
maintenance say) and then bring it back up, it won't automatically
sync up with zookeeper and become a leader or replica for any
Just found out that this was not an SolrCloud issue but an issue with the
Tomcat configuration basically the URIEncoding was missing added it and it
fixed the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-issue-accents-are-not-getting-removed-tp4
We noticed that when we use SolrCloud the accents are not getting removed
when we use the
filter. We are using the -Dbootstrap_conf=true to load the conf folder.
This filter however is working fine in the standalone solr startup scenario.
Did anyone notice the same issue? Do we need to d
Hi,
This is the parsed query string which *returns 3331234 documents*
content:elena content:read content:a
content:rate content:r content:page content:per content:minut content:a
content:total content:m content:minut re
and a Boolean "AND " query of the above query takes 410 ms and *returns
ju
You need a "response writer" that returns only text. The "wt" paramter
selects the response writer. You specified "json", so that's what you got.
Maybe "csv" would be closer to what you want.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Cougarman
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012
Hi. I asked this on the Tika group and the recommendation was to ask it here. I
am using the following C# code to call Tika and would like it to return the raw
text without any XML or JSON. So if the Word document contains "Hello World",
this should return only that text and no XML or anything e
Thanks a lot for your reply!!
This is the problem I face now when using dismax.
I have almost 30 fields (Some are dynamic fields from database) copied in to
copy field that is being used for default search. Now when I search using
dismax I need to include the boost for all the fields in the searc
Maybe this may help:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/ruby-sunspot/Y90mcJiIIQc%5B1-25%5D
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Geek Gamer
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: sunpot solr function query
Hi All ,
I am i
What you should consider is to use the edismax (or dismax) query parser and
then you can boost the individual fields. That's a major part of its reason
for existence - to overcome the limitation of copyField that you mention.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: bbarani
Sent: F
Hi,
I have 10 fields copied in to a single copy field for default search. I am
trying to boost one particular field in that copy field, but I am not sure
how boosting in copy field work. Can someone let me know how boosting works
in copy field?
Thanks,
BB
--
View this message in context:
http
First, provide us with the additional info Erik requested in his last reply.
Then, can you provide a snippet from your Solr log file that shows a couple
of queries. Maybe there is something else going on or some exceptions, or
something. Or at least to show us the quey times in context.
Final
Sorry typo ,I meant upwards of 20s at any time. What should I be looking at?
Regards
Sujatha
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> Erik,
>
> What could be the issue Load / I/O ? It seems to shows upwards of 20 ms
> at any time
>
> Regards
> Sujatha
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 a
Erik,
What could be the issue Load / I/O ? It seems to shows upwards of 20 ms at
any time
Regards
Sujatha
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Sujatha - that query debug output shows only 218ms, so it isn't
> representative of the issue you're reporting.
>
> Also, what's the
Sujatha - that query debug output shows only 218ms, so it isn't representative
of the issue you're reporting.
Also, what's the query parse output? I imagine you're doing a boolean OR
query across all those terms (include "a"), yes? Maybe you'd rather the
operator be AND?
Erik
On A
No customization,its the default standard request handler.Solr Version is
1.3
"a" is not there in stop words
Server Load ,i presume is not there , but not too sure ,not checked.
RAM :
TOTAL RAM :48GB
RAM to JVM :18 GB ,Permgen =2GB
TOTAL INDEX SIZE of all the multicore Instances =23GB
Timing
Just over 4M docs... no need to shard.
Both your queries contain what is likely very common terms (content:a in the
first one and content:1 in the second). Generally these are "stop words" and
removed either during indexing or querying, but I guess not in your case.
What's your "standard" req
Hi Erick,
The number of documents is : 4389048
I have given 2 queries below with timing and the number of hits
INFO: [ipc_widget_search] webapp=/multicore_5 path=/select/
params={version=2.1&fl=*+score&stylesheet=&qt=standard&fq=&rows=100&start=0&q=content:if+content:elena+content:reads+content:
Hi,
I think this is because of the space observed - facet.prefix= "empty
string" - Please see below
3
3
3
3
3
... so on
*But why is this space inserted?* If you see below, the list of keywords
taken from search results , there is no space.
Thanks & Regards
Rajani
On Fri, Aug
How many documents do you have? What are the queries? I'd guess your query
complexity (or load) is to blame here, not index size. What version of Solr?
Until you know what is causing the slow queries, sharding is not something to
consider I'd say. But yes, you would want to reindex to dist
Hi All,
* When I do facet.prefix on a * KEYWORDS *field(this field is multi
valued) , I don't get suggestion for the first key in this field . *
Example :
I have 2 documents with the field "KEYWORDS" containing multiple values.
偏振式3D成像原理
采用LED边缘发光的新技术
高级降噪运算法及画质增强技术可
紧凑机身，轻松携带
节能低耗，持久续航
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Peter Kirk wrote:
>> Hi, a question about sorting and dynamic fields in "Solr Specification
>> Version: 3.6.0.2012.04.06.11.34.07".
>>
>> I have a field defined like
>> > multiValued="false"/>
>>
>> Where type int is
>> > omitNorms="true" positionIncrementGap="0"/
23 matches
Mail list logo
