Hi All,
TL;DR version: We think we want to explore Lucene/Solr 4.0 and SolrCloud,
but I’m not sure if there is any good doco/articles on how to make
architecture choices for how to chop up big indexes… and what other general
considerations are part of the equation?
I’m throwing this post ou
I have not seen any recent activity on this, has anyone else ran into this
or been able to duplicate this problem?
On Jul 9, 2012 3:09 PM, "Jamie Johnson" wrote:
> Thanks Lance, attached is a trimmed down version of my schema and a
> print out of the object that exhibits the issue. Again if I pu
Hi,
That is by design, you can only highlight text fields. The solution is to copy
your "age" field to a "age_t" field and highlight on that instead.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
5. aug. 2012 kl. 09:25 skrev Yoni
it's completely off-topic. Solr does nothing with logging bolts. Solr uses
slf4j bridge to other logging backends, java.util.logging by default.
I bet for slow disk io. Try to bypass it: add > NUL to your java command.
Or configure java util logging with WARN root level to suppress INFO
output.
a
Hi,
I've found what's wrong. By default the query was returning 10 results.
With "rows" I can now return more than 10:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=400
Thanks for the help. From here I will try do dig deeper.
Best Regards,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Andre Lopes wrote:
>
Hi,
Thanks for the replies. The info in my admin/stats is the following:
searcherName : Searcher@f4e40da main
caching : true
numDocs : 654
maxDoc : 654
reader :
SolrIndexReader{this=6a6078e7,r=ReadOnlyDirectoryReader@6a6078e7,refCnt=1,segments=1}
readerDir :
org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirector
A quick check here is to go to your admin/stats page and look at
numDocs and maxDocs. numDocs is the number of documents that it's
possible to find, i.e. non updated/deleted docs. maxDocs is the number
of documents that have been added, and that count includes ones with
duplicate unique IDs.
So I'
Make sure the id is not duplicated. You might have inadvertently populated
the id field in your Solr schema with some non-key value that occurs with
high frequency (and may have roughly 9 unique values.)
Examine the 9 results and their id fields. Then look at some of your input
data to verify
Thanks for the replies,
I've now successfully indexed the database using the DataImportHandler
but there is something weird. I've indexed 654 entries but I can't
output all the 654 results.
After the I run the
"http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport?command=full-import"; I got 654
adds:
Aug 5, 20
First thing: Are you absolutely certain that the slaves are pointing at the
master? My first guess would be that somehow your slaves aren't talking
to the master. Take a look at the log files on one of the slaves, you should
see some information about the replication attempt, that would be good
inf
On 5 August 2012 17:17, Andre Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Solr. I've take some reads about how it works, but I can't
> find a clue for my specific situation.
>
> Here is my case. I've 2 database tables that I need to add to the
> index, but they are related. One entry in the table "clients"
In general, you need to "flatten" relational tables.
In this specific case, I see two choices:
1. Add a "customer_id" field to your contacts for the customer's id. The id
field for a contact would need to be a unique id such as the concatenation
of the customer id and the contact id. You can t
Hi,
I'm new to Solr. I've take some reads about how it works, but I can't
find a clue for my specific situation.
Here is my case. I've 2 database tables that I need to add to the
index, but they are related. One entry in the table "clients" could
have more than one entry in the table "contacts".
Hello, and Help! We've just moved solr (3.3.0) to a new set of servers, and
the slaves are not working. The new servers have the DNS cnames of the
previous servers, and no configuration files have changed. The master shows
index generation 1940, but slaves show generation 1. I have replicateAfter
c
Hello,
(sorry for the empty message earlier, that was by mistake)
I am experiencing a strange problem with highlighting. I have a simple
configuration roughly as follows:
edismax
all_text
...
on
*
false
I run the search on a single catch-all field calle
15 matches
Mail list logo
