yes u r correct. But problem is u can not just turnOff term frequency. You
have to turn off termpositions with it. And once i do that phrase searches
dont work.
I want termPositions=false termPositions=true
How would i do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
For a permanent solution, DataImportHandler and the scripting update
handler are the best choices- they are small files and live inside
Solr.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Sounds like a perl script would be sufficient.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message--
Sounds like a perl script would be sufficient.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Maski
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding new field before import- using post.jar
They are coming from text file.
SolrXML input doc
They are coming from text file.
SolrXML input documents are xmls in folder location. (To import these xmls,
I was using simple post.jar) Now, for each xml there is need to add 3
external new fields reading values from text file.
Regards
Rajani
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Jack Krupansky wro
What about just using highlighting and display both fields?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Mark , N wrote:
> I have a multivalued field "Tex" which is indexed , for example :
>
> F1: some value
> F2: some value
> Text = ( content of f1,f2)
>
> When user search , I am checking only
I don't think rounding will affect cache hits in either case _unless_
the input point for different queries can be very close to each other.
Think of the filter cache as being composed of a map where the key
is the (raw) filter query and the value is the set of documents in your
corpus that satisf
Would it work to use TermsComponent with wildcards?
Something like terms.regex="ABCD42??"...
see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent/
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Michael Della Bitta
wrote:
> I could be crazy, but it sounds to me like you need a trie, not a
> search index
Did you re-index everything after the change you made? Your old docs
will be sorted by null values in the title_sort field, so they'd all come out
first or last depending, then sub-sorted by internal Lucene doc ID.
If you have, can you just create an index with, say, 6 titles that sorts
improperly
Where are the values of the three new fields coming from?
Are they constant/default values?
Computed from other fields in the XML?
From other XML files?
From a text file?
From a database?
Or where?
So, given a specific Solr XML input document, how will you be accessing the
three field values
Thank you for the reply.
8.How about Extending class : XmlUpdateRequestHandler? Is it possible and
good method?
Regards
Rajani
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I hate to also add:
>
> 6. Use DataImportHandler
>
> It can index Solr XML, and could add field values, e
Have a look at my blog post
http://www.cominvent.com/2012/01/25/super-flexible-autocomplete-with-solr/ for
a walkthrough of how it could be done, as a separate Solr core.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 1. aug. 2
--- On Sat, 8/4/12, aniljayanti wrote:
> From: aniljayanti
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: auto completion search with solr using NGrams in SOLR
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, August 4, 2012, 8:57 AM
> Hi
> thanks,
>
> which doing searching i will search either with empname or
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We've been evaluating the atomic update feature in Solr4.0. It would be
> great if anyone can shed some light on the following.
>
> #) There seems to be more than one way to pass data to UpdateJSON for
> add/update. What would be the recommended way.
> https://gist.github.com/3256587 OR
Hi,
We've been evaluating the atomic update feature in Solr4.0. It would be
great if anyone can shed some light on the following.
#) There seems to be more than one way to pass data to UpdateJSON for
add/update. What would be the recommended way.
https://gist.github.com/3256587 OR https://gist.gi
14 matches
Mail list logo