Hi
thanks,
which doing searching i will search either with empname or title only. And
also not using any asterics in the query.
ex : if i search with "mic" result should come like
michale jackson
michale border
michale smith
want the result just like google search.
can us suggest me wht are t
> I'm using Solr 4.0 with ManifoldCF
> .5.1 crawling Open Text v10.5.
> I have the cats/atts turned on in Open Text and I can see
> them all in the
> Solr index.
> However, the id is just the URL to download the doc from
> open text and the
> document name either from Open Text or the document
> p
Hi Mark,
You are referring to the CloudSolrServer not CommonsHttpSolrServer right?
does the CommonsHttpSolrServer also round robin?
Do you recommend any tool for load testing SolrCloud?
Thanks,
Sauvik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-load-balanc
Okay - it does basically cycle through the servers. I forgot, it shuffles the
server list every time.
So it's okay for searching - but we want to make it smarter for indexing.
First perhaps by favoring leaders, and then hashing itself and sending directly
to the right leader.
Sent from my i
Yes, you can have multiple indexes with solrcloud, same as with stand
alone. We call them collections.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Brügge <
daniel.brue...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> thanks for the answer.
>
> the plan is that in lots of queries I just need faceted values a
Configure all your cores as you would in a single node setup. Then use
-Dbootstrap_config=true rather than the bootstrap option where you point at
one directory and give a config set name. That will bootstrap all of your
cores with the config they have locally, naming the config sets created
after
Right - though I'm not sure it load balances offhand - I think it might
just do the fail over part rather than the round robin . I was looking at
it the other day and need to investigate.
I also think it should be weighting towards sending to leaders - eg ideally
it should load balance across the
Hmmm, the zero results could be that you're searching against the
default text field and you don't have "conway" in that field. the
default search field has recently been deprecated, so try specifying a
field in your search
The debugQuery=on worked fine for me, so I'm not sure what's happening
actually I noticing that the CommonsHttpSolrServer seems to load balancing by
hitting all servers in the cluster, just wanted to confirm if that is the
case.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-load-balancing-tp3999143p3999145.html
Sent from the Solr -
You can use CloudSolrServer - "SolrJ client class to communicate with
SolrCloud. Instances of this class communicate with Zookeeper to discover
Solr endpoints for SolrCloud collections, and then use the LBHttpSolrServer
to issue requests."
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api-4_0_0-ALPHA/org/apac
Do anyone know if query using CommonsHttpSolrServer on SolrCloud is
automatically load balanced? I am trying to load test using solrmeter on one
if the node I am seeing all the nodes seems to be hit. Any clues
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-load-ba
Mark,
It's not clear what are you want to do. Let's say you requested rows=100
and found 1000 docs. What do you need to show in addition to search result?
- matched field on every of 100 snippets
- or "400 with F1 and 600 with F2"
- or what
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Himanshu Jindal
wrote:
> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"
> tokenFactory="solr.JapaneseTokenizerFactory" randomAttribute="randomValue"/>
I think you have a typo here, it should be tokenizerFactory, not tokenFactory
--
lucidimagination.com
Changing the Subject Line to make it easier to understand the topic of the
message
is there any plan to expose IndexDocValues as part of Solr 4?
Any thoughts?
-Saroj
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, roz dev wrote:
> As we all know, FIeldCache can be costly if we have lots of documents and
> lo
Hi,
I am trying to implement a solr based search engine for japanese language.
I am having trouble adding synonym supprt for japanese language.
I am using text_ja for my indexed text and I have the following entry in
schema.xml for it.
Here is my synonym.txt
国民経済計算, 国内総生産
I
You used the "replacement" rule format. You probably simply want the
"equivalent" rule format:
car, mascot
And, you probably only want to do this at index time. This would mean that
both "car" and "mascot" will be indexed at any position where either term
occurs. And at query time you don't n
Hi,
I'm trying to work out why Synonyms won't work for my installation of Solr.
Its a basic install (just using the "example" set, and have tweaked the
fields to what I need).
The files are all in: (schema.xml, synonyms.txt etc), but for some reason
its not working: /var/home/site/solr/example/s
I see that the new FSTSynonymFilterFactory is only "delegated" for Lucene
3.4 and later.
I vaguely recall that there was also a recent improvement in loading of
files for filters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 11:32 AM
T
Actually FST (and SynFilter based on it) was backported to 3.x.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> The Lucene FST guys made a big improvement in synonym filtering in
> Lucene/Solr 4.0 using FSTs. Or are you already using that?
The Lucene FST guys made a big improvement in synonym filtering in
Lucene/Solr 4.0 using FSTs. Or are you already using that?
Or if you are stuck with pre-4.0, you could do a preprocessor that
efficiently generates boolean queries for the synonym expansions. That
should give you more decent qu
I hate to also add:
6. Use DataImportHandler
It can index Solr XML, and could add field values, either statically or by
template glue if you need to combine multiple field values somehow.
And in 4.0 you'll be able to use:
7: scripting update processor
Erik
On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:
1. Google for "XSLT tools".
2. Write a script that loads the XML, adds the fields, and writes the
updated XML.
3. Same as #2, but using Java.
4. If the fields are constants, set default values in the schema and then
the documents will automatically get those values when added. Take the
default
You can include the fields in your "fl" list and then check those field
values explicitly in the client, or you could add &debugQuery=true to your
request and check for which field the term matched in. The latter requires
that you have the analyzed term (or check for closest matching term).
--
I could be crazy, but it sounds to me like you need a trie, not a
search index: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie
But in any case, what you want to do should be achievable. It seems
like you need to do EdgeNgrams and facet on the results, where
facet.counts > 1 to exclude the actual part numbers,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Justin Engelman wrote:
> I have an autocomplete index that I return highlighting information for but
> am getting an error with certain search strings and fields on Solr 3.5.
try the 3.6 release:
* LUCENE-3642, SOLR-2891, LUCENE-3717: Fixed bugs in CharTokenizer,
I have an autocomplete index that I return highlighting information for but
am getting an error with certain search strings and fields on Solr 3.5.
I’ve narrowed it down to a specific field matching with a specific search
string. And I’ve tried making a few different changes to the schema and
rebu
I have a multivalued field "Tex" which is indexed , for example :
F1: some value
F2: some value
Text = ( content of f1,f2)
When user search , I am checking only a "Text" field but i would also need
to display to users which Field ( F1 or F2 ) resulted the search hit
Is it possible in SOLR ?
Yes this works, Thank you.
Regards
Rajani
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Only do the ngram filter at index time. So, add a query-time analyzer to
> that field type but without the ngram filter.
>
> Also, add &debugQuery to your query request to see what Lucene query is
Hey all,
Our production system is heavily optimized for caching and nearly all parts
of queries are satisfied by filter caches. The only filter that varies a
lot from user to user is the location and distance. Currently we use the
default location field type and index lat/long coordinates as we ge
Hi Roy,
the example URL is correct if your core is available under that name
(configured in solr.xml) and has started without errors. I think I observed
that it makes a different whether there is a trailing slash or not (but that
was a while ago, so maybe that has changed).
If you can reach th
Few titles are as following:
Embattled JPMorgan boss survives power challenge - Jakarta Globe
Kitten Survives 6500-Mile Trip in China-US Container - Jakarta Globe
Guard survives hail of bullets - Jakarta Post
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Give us some pairs of titles
Give us some pairs of titles which sort the wrong way.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Anupam Bhattacharya
wrote:
> The approach used to work perfectly.
>
> But recently i realized that it is not working for more than 30 indexed
> records.
> I am using SOLR 3.5 version.
>
> Is there another
32 matches
Mail list logo
