Has the performance of highlighting large text documents been improved in Solr
4?
Thanks!
Pete
On Nov 5, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Sure, if you write a custom update handler. But I'm not at all sure
> this is "ideal".
> You're requiring all that data to be transmitted across t
subQueries.get(i).close() is nothing but pulling the refrence from the
vector and closing it. So yes. it wouldnt throw exception.
vector subQueries
Please let me know if you need any more information
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj <
karthick.soundara...@gmail.co
SimpleOrderedMap commonRequestParams; //This holds the common
request params.
Vector> subQueryRequestParams; // This holds the
request params of sub Queries
I use the above to create multiple localQueryRequests. To add a little more
information, I create new ResponseBuilder for each request
I al
First no. Because i do the following
for(i=0;i wrote:
> A finally clause can throw exceptions. Can this throw an exception?
> subQueries.get(i).close();
>
> If so, each close() call should be in a try-catch block.
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj
>
: the list of IDs is constant for a longer time. I will take a look at
: these join thematic.
: Maybe another solution would be to really create a whole new
: collection or set of documents containing the aggregated documents (from the
: ids) from scratch and to execute queries on this collection.
Should the old Signature code be removed? Given that the goal is to
have everyone use SolrCloud, maybe this kind of landmine should be
removed?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> This issue doesn't really describe your problem but a more general problem of
> distributed dedu
A finally clause can throw exceptions. Can this throw an exception?
subQueries.get(i).close();
If so, each close() call should be in a try-catch block.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj
wrote:
> Hello all,
> While running in my eclipse and run a set of
Just to clarify, the leak happens everytime a new searcher is opened.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj <
karthick.soundara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> While running in my eclipse and run a set of queries, this
> works fine, but when I run it in t
Hello all,
While running in my eclipse and run a set of queries, this
works fine, but when I run it in test production server, the searchers are
leaked. Any hint would be appreciated. I have not used CoreContainer.
Considering that the SearchHandler is running fine, I am not able to th
I assume your're indexing on the same server that is used to execute search
queries. Adding 20K documents in bulk could cause the Solr Server to 'stop
the world' where the server would stop responding to queries.
My suggestion is
- Setup master/slave to insulate your clients from 'stop the world'
"can any one explain" - add the &debugQuery=true option to your request and
Solr will give an explanation, including the parsed query and the Lucene
scoring of documents.
If you think Solr is wrong, show us a sample document that either is
supposed to appear that doesn't, or doesn't appear and
We will be using Solr 3.x version. I was wondering if we do need to worry
about this as we have only 10k index entries at a time. It sounds like a
very low number and we have only document type at this point.
Should we worry about directly using SolrJ for indexing and searching for
this low volume
Hi,
I'm currently using ManifoldCF (v.5.1) to crawl OpenText (v10.5) and the
output is sent to Solr (4.0 alpha).
All I see in the index is an id = to the opentext download URL and a version
(a big integer value).
What I don't see is the document name from OpenText or any of the Opentext
metadata.
D
Haven't tried this but:
1) I think SOLR 4 supports on-the-fly core attach/detach/select. Can
somebody confirm this?
2) If 1) is true, run everything as two cores.
3) One core is live in production
4) Second core is detached from SOLR and attached to something like
SolrJ, which I believe can index w
Hi,
Previously I asked a similar question and I have not fully implemented yet.
My plan is:
1) use Solr only for search, not for indexing
2) have a separate java process to index (calling lucene API directly, maybe
can call Solr API, I need to check more details).
As other people pointed earl
hopefully someone is using the lucene spatial toolkit aka LSP aka spatial4j,
and can answer this question
we are using this spatial tool for doing searches. overall, it seems to
work very well. however, finding documentation is difficult.
I have a couple of questions:
1. I have a geohash field
This issue doesn't really describe your problem but a more general problem of
distributed deduplication:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3473
-Original message-
> From:Daniel Brügge
> Sent: Fri 27-Jul-2012 17:38
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Deduplication in
Hi,
in my old Solr Setup I have used the deduplication feature in the update
chain
with couple of fields.
true
signature
false
uuid,type,url,content_hash
org.apache.solr.update.processor.Lookup3Signature
This worked fine. When I now use this in my 2 shards SolrCloud setup when
inserti
Hi all, I'm new to Solr, I have a problem with JSON format, this is my Java
client code:
PrintWriter out = res.getWriter();
res.setContentType("text/plain");
String query = req.getParameter("query");
SolrServer solr = new HttpSolrServer(solrServer);
ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolr
I was looking on Regex fragment for customizing my highlight fragment, I was
wondering how Regex fragment works within solr and googled for it , But
didn't found any results.
Can anybody tell me how regex fragmenter works with in solr.
And when regex fragmenter apply regex on fragments , do i
I have tons of these open.
searcherName : Searcher@24be0446 main
caching : true
numDocs : 1331167
maxDoc : 1338549
reader : SolrIndexReader{this=5585c0de,r=ReadOnlyDirectoryReader@5585c0de
,refCnt=1,segments=18}
readerDir : org.apache.lucene.store.NIOFSDirectory@
/usr/local/solr/highlander/data/...
Try taking a couple of thread dumps and see where in the stack the
snowball classes show up. That might give you a clue.
Did you customize the parameters to the stemmer? If so, maybe it has
problems with the file you gave it.
Just some generic thoughts that might help.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal
It is something from internally of the snowball analyzer (stemmer).
To find out more you should take a heapdump and look into it with
Memory Analyzer (MAT) http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
Regards,
Bernd
Am 27.07.2012 09:53, schrieb roz dev:
> Hi All
>
> I am trying to find out the reason for very
Your're welcome :-)
C
0 down vote favorite
I want solr highlight in specific format.
Below is string format for which i need to provide highlighting feature
---
130s: LISTEN! LISTEN! 138s: [THUMP] 143s: WHAT IS THAT? 144s: HEAR THAT?
152s: EVERYBODY, SHH. SHH. 156s: STAY UP THERE.
Brilliant!
Thank you very much :)
Inizio: Chantal Ackermann [c.ackerm...@it-agenten.com]
Inviato: venerdì 27 luglio 2012 11.20
Fine: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Skip first word
Hi Simone,
no I meant that you populate the two fields with the s
of virus signature
database 7333 (20120727) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
Hi Simone,
no I meant that you populate the two fields with the same input - best done via
copyField directive.
The first field will contain ngrams of size 1 and 2. The other field will
contain ngrams of size 3 and longer (you might want to set a decent maxsize
there).
The query for the autoc
Could you elaborate it, please?
thanks
S
Inizio: in.abdul [in.ab...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 26 luglio 2012 20.36
Fine: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Skip first word
That's is best option I had also used shingle filter factory . .
On Jul 26
Hi Chantal,
if I understand correctly, this implies that I have to populate different
fields according to their lenght. Since I'm not aware of any logical condition
you can apply to copyField directive, it means that this logic has to be
implementend by the process that populates the Solr core.
Yes, the index.
You know any link/documentation about upgrade solr 1.4.1 -> 3.6?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-solr-1-4-1-to-3-6-tp3996952p3997678.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All
I am trying to find out the reason for very high memory use and ran JMAP
-hist
It is showing that i have too many instances of org.tartarus.snowball.Among
Any ideas what is this for and why am I getting so many of them
num #instances#bytes Class description
---
in my case, I see only 1 searcher, no field cache - still Old Gen is almost
full at 22 GB
Does it have to do with index or some other configuration
-Saroj
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> What does the "Statistics" page in the Solr admin say? There might be
> several "se
33 matches
Mail list logo
