Hi all,
I have run CheckIndex. It seems that the index is currupted. I've got
plenty of exceptions like:
test: terms, freq, prox...ERROR: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
at
org.apache.lucene.store.ByteArrayDataInput.readBytes(ByteArrayDa
Hoss,
The new FieldValueSubsetUpdateProcessorFactory classes look phenomenal. I
haven't looked yet, but what are the chances these will be back-ported to
3.6 (or how hard would it be to backport them?)... I'll have to check out
the source in more detail.
If stuck on 3.6, what would be the best wa
Jack,
Thanks - this was indeed the issue. I still don't understand exactly why
(the same local-nexus-hosted Solr jars were the ones being duplicated on
the classpath: included in my custom -with-dependencies jars as well as in
the solr war, which was build/distributed/and hosted from the same nexu
According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605, the Lucene
QueryParser tokenizes on white space before giving any text to the
Analyzer. This makes it impossible to use multi-term synonyms because the
SynonymFilter only receives one word at a time.
Resolution to this would really he
Yes, these documents have lots of unique values as the same product could
be assigned to lots of other categories and that too, in a different sort
order.
We did some evaluation of heap usage and found that with kind of queries we
generate, heap usage was going up to 24-26 GB. I could trace it to
2M docs is actually pretty small. Sorting is sensitive to the number
of _unique_ values in the sort fields, not necessarily the number of
documents.
And sorting only works on fields with a single value (i.e. it can't have
more than one token after analysis). So for each field you're only talking
2
Thanks Erik for your quick feedback
When Products are assigned to a category or Sub-Category then they can be
in any order and price type can be regular or markdown.
So, reg and markdown products are intermingled as per their assignment but
I want to sort them in such a way that we
ensure that al
I had a request from a customer which to this point I have not seen
much similar so I figured I'd pose the question here. I've been asked
if it was possible to build a heat map from the results of a query. I
can imagine a process to do this through some post processing, but
that sounds very expen
Oops, I said "MLT will use the first search result from the original query",
but that is for the MLT handler. For the MLT component you get a separate
set of documents for each document in the results of the original query.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Se
Yes, it sounds like MLT is the way to go, but sometimes you have to get
creative in figuring out how to set the numerous parameters. And sometimes
you have to use the MLT request handler rather than /select with the MLT
component.
You might also encounter issues related to the shortness of the
Skimming this, I two options come to mind:
1> Simply apply primary, secondary, etc sorts. Something like
&sort=subcategory asc,markdown_or_regular desc,sort_order asc
2> You could also use grouping to arrange things in groups and sort within
those groups. This has the advantage of return
Hi there,
i have a solr server running containing tweets. my schema.xml contains
following fields:
my problem is actually quite simple; somewhere in my GUI the user types
text and i want to retrieve tweets that are most similar to it.
Therefore, i tried the "morelikethis" functionality. M
Hi All
>
> I have an index which contains a Catalog of Products and Categories, with
> Solr 4.0 from trunk
>
> Data is organized like this:
>
> Category: Books
>
> Sub Category: Programming
>
> Products:
>
> Product # 1, Price: Regular Sort Order:1
> Product # 2, Price: Markdown, Sort Order:2
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
