Solr automatically scales the scores of fuzzy matches by their distance from an
exact match. So, you don't have to change anything.
wunder
On May 26, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gau wrote:
> Hi Lori,
>
> Yeah. I thought exactly of the same solution. Use a copy field and boost
> the relevancy of the t
Hi Lori,
Yeah. I thought exactly of the same solution. Use a copy field and boost
the relevancy of the the exact match. But my question is more broad here.
For eg, if i have a synonym for James as Jim, Games, Jimmy, Jameson
And if I normalize the tf, norm, etc factors to 1, on searching for J
On May 26, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
> context path 'solr' and zookeeper sees all of them. I want to deploy a
> second solrcloud war into the same app server (thus same IP:port) in a
> different context like
Yeah cycles in general I agree are bad, but perhaps an option to also
include the original field or special handling of the aliased field to
support this.
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> That would create an alias "loop", which is not supported.
>
> For example,
>
> http:
Hi Darren,
You just need to do the following things in general to go multicore:
1. Use the folder *\example\multicore\core1* and *
\example\multicore\core2* as they were your actual *
\example\solr*.
2. Check if \multicore\solr.xml exists and it has the
element uncomented;
3.
A. Never optimize on the slave.
B. You probably do not need to optimize on the master.
"Optimize" does not optimize anything. It is forced merge, combining segments.
Solr automatically combines segments as needed.
wunder
On May 26, 2012, at 1:57 PM, sudarshan wrote:
> Hi All,
> I happen
Hi All,
I happen to see this message board just now. I want to clarify
certain things. I'm new to Solr. I'm trying to combine Solr's index
replication and optimization. I have some doubts about the working of
replication in a master slave setup.
>From the post, I understand that if the ind
It's not really clear from the wiki how to use cores as shard replicas
within the same solr server. In my mind, having a separate JVM/solr
node/ acting as a replica makes sense because the replication traffic
will be on a different channel in a different vm and won't interfere
with search/indexing
That would create an alias "loop", which is not supported.
For example,
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?debugQuery=true&defType=edismax&f.person_first_name.qf=genre_s&f.person_last_name.qf=id&f.name.qf=name+person_first_name+person_last_name&q=name:smith
in Solr 3.6 generates a 400 response
Why not using multicore?
Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
+55 21 8272-7970
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
> context path 'solr' and zookeeper sees all of them. I want to deploy a
> second solrclo
Hi,
I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
context path 'solr' and zookeeper sees all of them. I want to deploy a
second solrcloud war into the same app server (thus same IP:port) in a
different context like 'solrrep' with the same config (cloned).
Will this work? Or d
> Consider a db of just names. Now if I
> use synonym expansion at query time, I
> get a set of results.
> (Background: I created a class, which resets idf, tf, ..
> .all to 1) since
> they dont matter to me anymore. What really matters is, how
> closely does the
> query match to the given name.
I'm not sure about your approach, turning off most of the features
which produce a similarity measure in a vsm and then wanting to sort
by a similarity could lead to pain. (I don't know your usecase so this
could still be valid)
One approach to, (well what I think your usecase might be...) is to
u
13 matches
Mail list logo
