Re: EmbeddedSolrServer and StreamingUpdateSolrServer

Hi, Any more thoughts?? Thanks, PC Rao. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-and-StreamingUpdateSolrServer-tp3889073p3940383.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr hanging

Hi Chris Hostetter Does that mean, that the last two questions I have posted hasn't reached the mailing list? Best regards Trym Den 25-04-2012 19:58, Chris Hostetter skrev: : Subject: Solr hanging : References:<31fdac6b-c4d9-4383-865d-2faca0f09...@geekychris.com> : : In-Reply-To: : https://

Re: Title Boosting and IDF

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > Interestingly, I worked at two different web search companies with two > different completely different search engines, and one arrived at an 8X title > boost and the other at a 7.5X title boost. So I consider 8X a universal > physical

Re: Title Boosting and IDF

Interestingly, I worked at two different web search companies with two different completely different search engines, and one arrived at an 8X title boost and the other at a 7.5X title boost. So I consider 8X a universal physical constant. I totally agree about using real user queries and real

Re: Title Boosting and IDF

Thanks, Erick! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Title-Boosting-and-IDF-tp3936709p3940008.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Title Boosting and IDF

Your first and biggest problem will be to define "good" result ordering. You have some anecdotal statements that amount to something like "sometimes I don't like the results". But unless you can quantify this, you'll spend a LOT of time going tweaking the results ordering and then going back and re

Re: QueryElevationComponent and distributed search

Hi Mark Thanks a lot for your response. Yeah, I was looking for distributed methods. I would like to know the reason why it didn't work in Solr 3.6. When i try (i only have solar 3.6) Note: the same query below works when i replace elevate with select, by which i am assuming my setup is correct.

Boosting fields in SOLR using Solrj

Hi, I'm using the solrj API to query my SOLR 3.6 index. I have multiple text fields, which I would like to weight differently. From what I've read, I should be able to do this using the dismax or edismax query types. I've tried the following: SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery(); query.setQuery( "ti

Re: QueryElevationComponent and distributed search

On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:54 PM, srinir wrote: > Can anyone tell me whether support for distributed search is added to > QueryElevationComponent in solr 4.0 ? Yes. > > I looked at QueryElevationComponent code in trunk and it doesnt seem to have > any code to support distributed search. Am I missi

Re: Synonyms file in solr

Your example are not synonyms so i don't think synonyms.txt by itself is going to work. This sounds like tagging using a taxonomy. Values written to the field storing this taxonomy could be like: livingthing/animal/cat [doc about cats] livingthing/animal/dog [doc about dogs] livingthing/animal [do

Re: QueryElevationComponent and distributed search

Can anyone tell me whether support for distributed search is added to QueryElevationComponent in solr 4.0 ? I looked at QueryElevationComponent code in trunk and it doesnt seem to have any code to support distributed search. Am I missing something here ? -- View this message in context: http:/

Re: The index speed in the solr

Thanks for your suggestion. I will try later and give you a feedback if possible Now the way I use is to remove some ngram. Thanks again! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/The-index-speed-in-the-solr-tp3931338p3939366.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a

Re: Deciding whether to stem at query time

Hi Andrew, * store == store the original value of the text/string being indexed * index == do analysis on the original text/string, which typically means tokenization of text and optional filtering/modifying (e.g. removing, stemming) of tokens. * indexed fields can be searched * fields that are

Re: embedded solr populating field of type LatLonType

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jason Cunning wrote: > My question is, what is the AppropriateJavaType for populating a solr field > of type LatLonType? A String with both the lat and lon separated by a comma. Example: "12.34,56.78" -Yonik lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search

Re: solr replication failing with error: Master at: is not available. Index fetch failed

Hi, Is the replication still failing or working fine with that change ? On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:16 PM, geeky2 wrote: > that was it! > > thank you. > > i did notice something else in the logs now ... > > what is the meaning or implication of the message, "Connection reset".? > > > > 2012-04-24

Re: Why a query with a hyphen is not returning a document?

I see what, but I'm not sure why. name:spider-man winds up being a phrase query, so if "spider" and "man" don't appear next to each other you won't match. And your indexing process is messing with the term positions when it injects the grams in your index, so spider is in position 6 and man is in

Re: Solr hanging

: Subject: Solr hanging : References: <31fdac6b-c4d9-4383-865d-2faca0f09...@geekychris.com> : : In-Reply-To: : https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to an existing message,

Re: A endless loop in new SolrCloud probably

On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Jam Luo wrote: > Hi >I deployed a solr cluster,the code version is > "NightlyBuilds apache-solr-4.0-2012-03-19_09-25-37". >Cluster has 4 nodes named "A", "B", "C", "D", "num_shards=2", A and > C in shard1 , B and D in shard2, A and B is the leader of their

Re: Multi-words synonyms matching

A little farther down the debug info output you'll find something like this (I specified fq=name:features) name:features so it may well give you some clue. But unless I'm reading things wrong, your q is going against a field that has much more information than the CATEGORY_ANALYZED field, is i

Re: can I use different tokenizer/analyzer for facet count query?

If you use the KeywordTokenizer at index time too it should do what you want. If that is not possible create another field. Best practices for facet fields: Indexed, not Tokenized (KeywordTokenizer) Not stored On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:52 PM, sam ” wrote: > From wiki: > http://wiki.apache.org

Re: can I use different tokenizer/analyzer for facet count query?

>From wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters If you want both Analysis (for searching) and Faceting on the full literal Strings, *use copyField *to create two versions of the field: one Text and one String. Make sure both are indexed="true" Is that the only way? Do I need to have

Re: DIH NoClassFoundError.

in such cases I use lsof -p | grep jar On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Michael Kuhlmann wrote: > Am 25.04.2012 15:57, schrieb stockii: > > is it not fucking possible to import DIH !?!?!? WTF! >> > > It is fucking possible, you just need to either point your goddamn > classpath to the data imp

can I use different tokenizer/analyzer for facet count query?

I have the following in schema.xml And, I have the following doc: blues$Teal/Turquoise ... Response of the query: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=colors&rows=100

Re: DIH NoClassFoundError.

Am 25.04.2012 15:57, schrieb stockii: is it not fucking possible to import DIH !?!?!? WTF! It is fucking possible, you just need to either point your goddamn classpath to the data import handler jar in the contrib folders, or you have to add the appropriate contrib folder into the "lib dir" e

Re: DIH NoClassFoundError.

On 4/25/2012 7:57 AM, stockii wrote: i load the new solr 3.6. from website. but when i started solr i got evertime " no DIH found" if i put in my solrconfig AND have this structure http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3938253/Bildschirmfoto.png i got this message: SEVERE: java.lang.NoClass

DIH NoClassFoundError.

is it not fucking possible to import DIH !?!?!? WTF! i load the new solr 3.6. from website. but when i started solr i got evertime " no DIH found" if i put in my solrconfig AND have this structure http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3938253/Bildschirmfoto.png i got this message: SEVERE:

Re: Multi-words synonyms matching

I'm not at the office until next Wednesday, and I don't have my Solr under hand, but isn't debugQuery=on giving informations only about q parameter matching and nothing about fq parameter? Or do you mean "parsed_filter_querie"s gives information about fq? CATEGORY_ANALYZED is being populated by a

Re: faceted searches - design question - facet field not part of qf search fields

thank you BOTH, Erick and Hos for the insight. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/faceted-searches-design-question-facet-field-not-part-of-qf-search-fields-tp3936509p3938080.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Searching on fields with White Spaces

Problem here is that e.g. New York is stored as two different tokens in your index, as you use white space tokenizer. The easiest solution would be to detect and break the incoming one-word query tokens into several tokens, i.e. newyork => new york. That's probably possible only if there is a finit

Re: Group by distance

Ah, OK. Then what you're doing is probably best. You're essentially creating a marker for your docs that should be grouped together, and you don't really need any distances here at all. Actually, this would also work with faceting. You could facet on your geo_city field (and it could even be just

Dynamic creation of cores for this use case.

Hi everyone , I am new to solr. I have a use case which describes as below, I have a use case to create cores based on customers and partners. There are about 2500 customers each customers having on an average of 1 devices. The partner is a group of customers say 30 . So , we have cust

Re: Group by distance

I mean many group's show on map... something like markercluster: http://gmaps-utility-library.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/markerclusterer/1.0/examples/speed_test_example.html But I don't want to send all my records to browser. I find workaround to make field wiitch lower precission geocoding: $lat =

Re: Auto suggest on indexed file content filtered based on user

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:18 AM, prakash_ajp wrote: > Is it true that faceting is case sensitive? That would be disastrous for > our > requirement :( > > it depends on your schema definition: if you lower case your tokens both for index and query sides, the faceting should not be case sensitive.