You can use Luke to view Lucene Indexes.
Anupam
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing data import using DIH in solr 3.5. I'm curious to know whether it
> is see the xml representation of indexed data from the browser. Is it
> possible?
> I just want to m
Hi all,
I'm doing data import using DIH in solr 3.5. I'm curious to know whether it
is see the xml representation of indexed data from the browser. Is it
possible?
I just want to make sure these data is correctly indexed with correct value
or for debugging purpose.
--
Chamnap
You could setup a ManifoldCF job to fetch the XMLs and then setup a new
SolrOutputConnection for /solr/update/xslt?tr=myStyleSheet.xsl where
myStyleSheet.xsl is the stylesheet to use for that kind of XML. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltUpdateRequestHandler
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution a
Or is it because query is on "keyword" field and I expect matching keywords
to be highlighted on "excerpts" field? Any insights would help a lot.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-text-field-when-query-is-for-string-field-tp3475334p3814159.ht
So I've thrown something together fairly quickly which is based on
what Ahmet had sent that I believe will preserve the original token as
well as the stemmed version. I didn't go as far as weighting them
differently using the payloads however. I am not sure how to use the
preserveOriginal attribu
I knew there had to be an easy way. That was it. Thanks for the tip!
Mike Rawlins
Sr. Software Engineer
Chair, ASC X12 Technical Assessment Subcommittee
18111 Preston Road, Suite 600
Dallas, TX 75252
+1 972.643.3101 direct
mike.rawl...@gxs.com
www.gxs.com
GXS Blog
-Original Message-
Fr
I'm doing something like that by hacking SolrRequestParsers, I tried to
find more legal way but haven't found it
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAF=Pa597RpLjVWZbM=0aktjhpnea4m931j0s1s4bda4qe+t...@mail.gmail.com%3E
I added into solrconfig.xml
https://github.com/
When searching across multiple fields, is there a way to identify which
field(s) resulted in a match without using highlighting or stored fields?
second mean is 48.05%...
2012/3/9 Raimon Bosch
> The answer is so easy. Just need to create an index with each visit. In
> this way I could use faceted date search to create time statistics.
>
> "flats for rent new york" at 1/12/2011 => bounce_rate=48.6%
> "flats for rent new york" at 1/1/2012 =
The answer is so easy. Just need to create an index with each visit. In
this way I could use faceted date search to create time statistics.
"flats for rent new york" at 1/12/2011 => bounce_rate=48.6%
"flats for rent new york" at 1/1/2012 => bounce_rate=49.7%
"flats for rent new york" at 1/2/2012 =
Further digging leads me to believe this is not the case. The Synonym
Filter supports this, but the Stemming Filter does not.
Ahmet,
Would you be willing to provide your filter as well? I wonder if we
can make it aware of the preserveOriginal attribute on
WordDelimterFilterFactory?
On Fri, Ma
Ok, so I'm digging through the code and I noticed in
org.apache.lucene.analysis.synonym.SynonymFilter there are mentions of
a keepOrig attribute. Doing some googling led me to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters which
speaks of an attribute preserveOriginal="1" on
solr.Word
Take a look at the solr/CHANGES.txt file. Each release has
an "Upgrading from " section, the one you're interested in
is "Upgrading from Solr 1.4" in the 3.1.0 section, and then the
ones that are in subsequent sections.
Of course I'd try it on a copy of my index first...
If at all possible, the e
On the other hand, I'm aware of the fact that if I go with Lucene approach,
failover is something that I will have to support manually! which is a
nightmare!
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
> This solution makes sense, but I still don't know if I can use solrCloud
> with
> t
Did you try setting "baseDir" to the root directory and "recursive" to true ?
(see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#FileListEntityProcessor for
more information).
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
From: mike.rawl...@gxs.com [mailto:mike.rawl...@gxs.
This solution makes sense, but I still don't know if I can use solrCloud
with
this configuration or not.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Robert Stewart wrote:
> Split up index into say 100 cores, and then route each search to a
> specific core by some mod operator on the user id:
>
> core_number
Split up index into say 100 cores, and then route each search to a specific
core by some mod operator on the user id:
core_number = userid % num_cores
core_name = "core"+core_number
That way each index core is relatively small (maybe 100 million docs or less).
On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Glen
probably, and besides that, how can I use the features that SolrCloud
provides (i.e. high availability and distribution)?
The other solution would be to use SolrCloud and keep all of the users'
information in single collection and use NRT. But on the other hand
the frequency of updates on that big
millions of cores will not work...
...yet.
-glen
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lan wrote:
> Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your hardware,
> inodes and how many files you could keep open.
>
> I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same hardw
Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your hardware,
inodes and how many files you could keep open.
I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same hardware
limits.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-desig
All,
I have an application that has RDF files in multiple subdirectories under a
root directory. I'm using the DIH with a FileListEntityProcessor to load the
index. All worked fine when the files were in a single directory, but I can't
seem to figure out how to make a single data-config.xml rea
Sorry I didn't mention that, the number of users can be millions!
Meaning that millions of cores! So I'm not sure if it's a good idea.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lan wrote:
> Solr has cores which are independent search indexes. You could create a
> separate core per user.
>
> --
> View this
Solr has cores which are independent search indexes. You could create a
separate core per user.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813489.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi everybody,
Let's say we have a system with billions of small documents (average of 2-3
fields).
and each document belongs to JUST ONE user
and searches are user specific, meaning that when we search
for something, we just look into documents of that user.
On the other hand we need to see the n
Here's one way to do it using dismax.
1. You'll have two fields.
title_text which is has a type of TextField
title_string which has type String. This is an exact match field.
2. Set the dismax qf=title_string^10 title_text^1
You could even make this better by doing also handling infix searches
hello all,
does solr have a mechanism that could intercept a request (before it is
handed off to a request handler).
the intent (from the business) is to send in a generic request - then
pre-parse the url and send it off to a specific request handler.
thank you,
mark
--
View this message in co
This (almost) sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2492 which
was fixed in Solr 3.4 .. Are you on an earlier version?
But maybe not, because you're seeing the # deleted documents increment, and
prior to this bug fix (I think) the deleted counter wasn't getting incremented
eith
> I'd be very interested to see how you
> did this if it is available. Does
> this seem like something useful to the community at large?
I PMed it to you. Filter is not a big deal. Just modified from {@link
org.apache.lucene.wordnet.SynonymTokenFilter}. If requested, I can provide it
publicly t
Hi,
Take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
Then from php, you need to pass the right parameters as described in the
link above.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Spadez wrote:
> A quick, bump, I could really do with some input on this please.
>
> --
> View this message in contex
Hello,
AFAIK DIH is not multi-threaded at all. see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3011
Regards
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Rohit Khanna wrote:
> When i try running a multi threaded DIH in solr 3.5 I get the following
> error "Operation not allowed after ResultSet closed ".
>
>
Hello,
When I issue this query to create a new Solr Core , I get the error message
HTTP Status 500 - Can't find resource 'solrconfig.xml' in classpath or
'/home/searchuser/searchinstances/multi_core_prototype/solr/conf/
http://
/multi_core_prototype/admin/cores?action=CREATE&name=coreX&instanceDi
When i try running a multi threaded DIH in solr 3.5 I get the following
error "Operation not allowed after ResultSet closed ".
I have multiple entities mapped to fields, after the first query finishes i
get this error for every other query thats been mentioned in my
data-config.xml file.
I have me
> if you store your boost in a search-able numeric field...
You can simply sort by that field too. q=*:*&sort=your_boost_field desc
(12/03/09 12:35), Donald Organ wrote:
Are there any reporting tools out there? So I can analyzer search term
frequency, filter frequency, etc?
You may be interested in:
Free Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.
A quick, bump, I could really do with some input on this please.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Geolocation-in-SOLR-with-PHP-application-tp3807120p3812364.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It very much depends on your data and also what query features you will use.
How many fields, the size of each field, how many unique values per field, how
many fields are stored vs. only indexed, etc. I have a system with 3+ billion
does, and each instance (each index core) has 120million doc
> Are there any reporting tools out
> there? So I can analyzer search term
> frequency, filter frequency, etc?
You might be interested in this :
http://www.sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Hi Gian Marco,
I don't know if it's possible to exploit documents' boost values from
function queries (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery), but if
you store your boost in a search-able numeric field, you could either :
do
q=*:* AND _val_:"your_boost_field"
if you're using default
Hi Ahmet,
thanks for the answer.
I'm really suprised because I always thought docBoost as a kind of sorting
tool.
And I used in that way, I'm giving big boost to the documents I want back
first in search.
Do you think there is a trick to force the usage of docBoost in my special
case?
Gian Ma
as Gora says there is the stats component you can take advantage of or you
could also use JMX directly [1] or LucidGaze [2][3] or commercial services
like [4] or [5] (these are the ones I know but there may be also others),
each of them with different level/type of service.
Tommaso
[1] : http://w
On 9 March 2012 09:05, Donald Organ wrote:
> Are there any reporting tools out there? So I can analyzer search term
> frequency, filter frequency, etc?
Do not have direct experience of any Solr reporting
tool, but please see the Solr StatsComponent:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent
T
41 matches
Mail list logo
