I have not specified the multivalued attribute.
I have different integer properties in my java class, some are single
integer values, some are integer arrays. What I want is if the setter
method is expecting an integer then the field stored must be single valued.
But all integer dynamic fields a
Ok, My bad. I should have put it in a better way.
Is it good idea to have all the 30M docs on a single instance, or should I
consider distributed set-up.
I have synthesized the data and the have configured schema and have made
suitable changes to the config. Have tested out with a smaller data-set
I'd be very interested to see how you did this if it is available. Does
this seem like something useful to the community at large?
On Thursday, March 8, 2012, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>> Thanks the KeywordMarkerFilterFactory
>> seems to be what I was looking
>> for. I'm still wondering about keeping
All,
I recreated the cluster on my machine at home (Windows 7, Java 1.6.0.23,
apache-solr-4.0-2012-02-29_09-07-30) , sent some document through Manifold
using its crawler, and it looks like it's replicating fine once the
documents are committed.
This must be related to my environment somehow. Tha
Are there any reporting tools out there? So I can analyzer search term
frequency, filter frequency, etc?
Have you looked at ExtractingRequestHandler (aka Solr Cell)? SolrJ?
Tika?
Perhaps if you defined the problem a bit more we'd be able to
give you more comprehensive answers
Best
Erick
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Rohan Ashok Kumbhar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know how to index any
Your question is really unanswerable, there are about a zillion
factors that could influence the answer. I can index 5-7K docs/second
so it's "efficient". Others can index only a fraction of that. It all depends...
Try it and see is about the only way to answer.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at
the two solr instances are used to provide a failover. can i define the
priority of the two instances?
-- Original --
From: "我自己的邮箱"<345804...@qq.com>;
Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 02:05 PM
To: "solr-user";
Subject: two solr instances using one index
Hi, e
: I am suddenly getting a maxClauseCount exception for no reason. I am
: using Solr 3.5. I have only 206 documents in my index.
Unless things have changed the reason you are seeing this is because
_highlighting_ a query (clause) like "type_s:[*+TO+*]" requires rewriting
it into a giant boolea
: I've found a couple of discussions online that suggest I ought to be
: able to set the prefix using local params:
:
: facet.field={!prefix=0;}foo
: facet.field={!prefix=1_foovalue; key=bar}foo
citation please?
as far as i know that has ever been implemented, but the idea was floated
: I am using a solr.StopFilterFactory in a query filter for a text_general
: field (here: content). It works fine, when I query the field for the
: stopword, then I am getting no results.
...
: used in the text. What I am trying to achieve is, to also filter the
: stopwords from the facet_
Well, if you really want EXACT exact, just use a KeywordTokenizer (ie,
not tokenize at all). But then matches will really have to be EXACT,
including punctuation, whitespace, diacritics, etc. But a query will
only match if it 'exactly' matches one value in your multi-valued field.
You could t
: I have an app the writes lucene indexes and is based on lucene 2.3.0.
:
: Can I read those indexes using solr 3.5.0 and perform a distributed search?
: Or should I use a lower version of solr, so that the index reader is
: compatible with the index writer.
a) Lucene 2.3.0 is pretty damn ancien
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm researching options for handling a better geospatial solution. I'm
> currently using Solr 3.5 for a read-only "database", and the
> point/radius searches work great. But I'd like to start doing point in
> polygon searches as well.
> Thanks the KeywordMarkerFilterFactory
> seems to be what I was looking
> for. I'm still wondering about keeping the unstemmed
> word as a token
> though. While I know that this would increase the
> index size slightly
> I wonder what the negative of doing such a thing would
> be? Just seems
>
Hello Everyone,
I'm trying to work out how, if at all possible, dynamicFields can be
imported from a dynamic data source through the DataImportHandler
configurations. Currently the DataImportHandler configuration file
requires me to name every single field I want to map in advance, but I do
n
Thanks the KeywordMarkerFilterFactory seems to be what I was looking
for. I'm still wondering about keeping the unstemmed word as a token
though. While I know that this would increase the index size slightly
I wonder what the negative of doing such a thing would be? Just seems
less destructive s
Ahmet,
That is a great idea. I will try it.
Thank you.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> WildcardQueries are wrapped into ConstantScoreQuery.
>
> I would create a copy field of these fields using the following field type.
>
> Then you can search on these copyFields (qf). Wi
On 3/8/2012 7:02 AM, stetogias wrote:
Hi,
Trying to understand the update handler statistics
so I have this:
commits : 2824
autocommit maxDocs : 1
autocommit maxTime : 1000ms
autocommits : 41
optimizes : 822
rollbacks : 0
expungeDeletes : 0
docsPending : 0
adds : 0
deletesById : 0
deletesBy
WildcardQueries are wrapped into ConstantScoreQuery.
I would create a copy field of these fields using the following field type.
Then you can search on these copyFields (qf). With this approach you don't need
to use start operator. defType=edismax&q=grow&fl=title,score
Any help on this? I am really stuck on a client project. I need to
know how scoring works with wildcard queries under SOLR 3.2.
Thanks
Bob
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Robert Stewart wrote:
> How is scoring affected by wildcard queries? Seems when I use a
> wildcard query I get all constan
Hi,
Trying to understand the update handler statistics
so I have this:
commits : 2824
autocommit maxDocs : 1
autocommit maxTime : 1000ms
autocommits : 41
optimizes : 822
rollbacks : 0
expungeDeletes : 0
docsPending : 0
adds : 0
deletesById : 0
deletesByQuery : 0
errors : 0
cumulative_adds : 1
On 8 March 2012 16:18, gabriel shen wrote:
> Our indexing process is to adding a bundle of solr documents(for example
> 5000) to solr each time, and we observed that before commiting(which might
> be io bounded) it uses less than half the CPU capacity constantly, which
> sounds strange to us why i
> I was previously using the
> PorterStemmer to do stemming and ran into
> an issue where it was overly aggressive with some words or
> abbreviations which I needed to stop. I have recently
> switched to
> KStem and I believe the issue is less, but I was wondering
> still if
> there was a way to s
How are you sending documents to solr ?
If you push solr input documents via HTTP (which is what SolrJ does),
you could increase CPU consumption (and therefor reduce indexing time)
by sending your update requests asynchronously, using multiple updating
threads, to your single solr core.
Some
Ah, you're right. If you queries run across several commits
you'll get multiple searchers open.
I don't know of any good way to do what you want.
I'm curious, why can't you do a master/slave setup?
The other thing to think about would be the NRT stuff
if you can run trunk.
Best
Erick
On Wed, M
Yes, there are trunk nightly builds, see:
https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Solr/job/Solr-trunk/
But I don't think LSP is in trunk at this point, so that's not useful. The
code branch is on (I think)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_3795_ls_spatial_playground
but I
Anyone could reply this questions?
Thanks
2012/3/5 Anderson vasconcelos
> Hi
>
> I have some questions about StreamingUpdateSolrServer.
>
> 1)What's queue size parameter? It's the number of documents in each
> thread?
>
> 2)When i configurated like this StreamingUpdateSolrServer(URL, 1000, 5)
You haven't really given us much to go on here. Matches
are just like a single valued field with the exception of
the increment gap. Say one entry were
large cat big dog
in a multi-valued field. ay the next document
indexed two values,
large cat
big dog
And, say the increment gap were 100. The tok
Hello All,
On Protyping from moving from solr Multiple Webapps to Solr Multi Cores
[1.3 Version both]..I am running into the following issues and Questions
1) We are primarily moving to Multicore because ,we saw the Permgen memory
being increased ,each time we created a new solr webapp ,so t
Our indexing process is to adding a bundle of solr documents(for example
5000) to solr each time, and we observed that before commiting(which might
be io bounded) it uses less than half the CPU capacity constantly, which
sounds strange to us why it doesn't use full cpu power. As for RAM, I don't
kn
On 8 March 2012 15:39, gabriel shen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that, sequential indexing on 1 solr core is only using 40% of our
> 8 virtual core CPU power. Why isn't it use 100% of the power? Is there a
> way to increase CPU utilization rate?
[...]
This is an open-ended question which could be d
Hi,
If I remove the DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory I will have to manage a
master slave setup myself by updating solely to the master and replicating to
any slave. I wonder is it possible to have distributed updates but confined to
the sub-set of cores and replicas within a collection that
Hi Chris,
thanks for your response.Ok, we will wait :)
Best Regards
Vadim
2012/3/8 Chris Hostetter
>
> : where and when is the next Eurocon scheduled?
> : I read something about denmark and autumn 2012(i don't know where *g*).
>
> I do not know where, but sometime in the fall is probably th
34 matches
Mail list logo
