Daniel,
thanks very much:)
however, i have allocated enough memory to java as follows:
java -XX:+AggressiveHeap -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m -jar start.jar
any other reason for that Outofmemory error ?
ps: it is strange, though my search like "id: chenm" caused "SEVERE:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError:
thanks for replying ..
In our RDBMS schema we have Establishment/Event/Movie master relations.
Establishment has title ,description , ratings, tags, cuisines
(multivalued), services (multivalued) and features (multivalued) like
fields..similarly in Event title, description, category(multivalued)
: problem becomes from MoreLikeThis behaviour. As you probably know that Solr
: feature only suggests similar components by the first - and only - document
: returned from the original query. That is if you have a query that returns
: 5 documents (a query with five IDs with OR boolean clauses, lik
: unique terms) but I agree with Erik on the ExternalFileField as you can use
: it just inside a function query, for example, for boosting.
with {!frange} it would be trivial to filter based on values in an
ExternalFileField ... whether that would be *faster* then a custom
plugin that worked sim
On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:49 PM, Ranjan Bagchi wrote:
> it didn't kick the second shard out of the cluster.
>
> Any way to do this?
If you unload a core rather than just shut down the instance, that core will
remove it's info from zookeeper.
Currently, that won't make it forget about a logical sh
On Mar 6, 2012, at 7:50 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> What I think was mentioned on this a bit ago is that the index stops
> working if one of the "nodes" goes down unless its a replica.
>
> You have 2 "nodes" running with numShards=2? Thus if one goes down the
> entire index is inoperable. In the
nvm, they are identical. The problem is that I'm missing rows=0
query string that counts identical fiels are:
solr/select/?q=*%3A*&rows=0&facet=true&facet.field=domain
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Yuhan Zhang wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I'm using the solrj Java client to query solr server with face
Hi James,
Thanks for the detailed reply and sorry for the delay getting back.
One issue for us with using the collate functionality is that some of our
query types are default OR (implemented using the mm param value). Since
the collate functionality reruns the query using all param values speci
hi all,
I'm using the solrj Java client to query solr server with facet. However,
it ends up that it is giving the wrong query string,
as I'm expecting:
/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&facet=on&facet.field=domain
it gave
/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&facet=true&facet.field=domain
it set facet=true instead of facet
edismax did the trick! Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-tokenization-that-finds-part-of-stringvalue-tp3785366p3805045.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> @iorixxx: Sorry it took so long, had
> some difficulties upgrading to 3.5.0
>
> It still doesnt work. Here's what I have now:
>
> I copied text_general_rev from
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/solr/conf/schema.xml
> to my schema.xml:
> class="solr.TextField"
@iorixxx: Sorry it took so long, had some difficulties upgrading to 3.5.0
It still doesnt work. Here's what I have now:
I copied text_general_rev from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/solr/conf/schema.xml
to my schema.xml:
also tried :
to get my description content processed, but no success until now ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/XSLT-Response-Writer-and-content-transformation-tp3800251p3804528.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
Well, by default solr distribution is using xalan ?
- I have created my custom class mypackage.XsltCustomFunctions, with my
custom method processContent(), put jar in jetty/lib root directory.
- update my rss.xsl file by adding
xmlns:ev="xalan://mypackage.XsltCustomFunctions" in header
- try this
Thanks Erick, for the prompt response,
Both the suggestions will be useful for a one time indexing activity. Since
DIH will be one time process of indexing the repository thus it is of no
use in my case.Writing a standalone Java program utilizing SolrJ will again
be a one time indexing process.
I
so my mistake on this, I was not setting hl.snippets so the default
value of 1 was being used. If I change to 2 I get the expected
result.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> as an FYI I tried this with the standard highlighter and got the same
> result. Additionally if it ma
On 6 March 2012 18:01, Abhishek tiwari wrote:
> i am new in solr want help in shema design . i have multiple entities
> like Event , Establishments and Movies ..each have different types of
> relations.. should i make diffrent core for each entities ?
It depends on your use case, i.e., what wou
as an FYI I tried this with the standard highlighter and got the same
result. Additionally if it matters this is using the following text
field definition
At this level of control consider using SolrJ instead, especially for
alerts and such. See:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Best
Erick
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, geeky2 wrote:
> hello all,
>
> we are approaching the time when we will move our first sol
Where are synonyms in your ngrammed-field filter chain? It would help
if you showed the two field definitions.
Try using the admin/analysis page to see each step in the transformation,
be sure to check the verbose checkbox.
And examples of the input, and results (&debugQuery=on) would also be
use
Hi Martijn,
thanks for your answer - unfortunately we need the JoinQuery for the
main query, not only for the filters...
Looks like we have to get the scoring for "query-time joins" working on
our own then, maybe inspired by the "BlockJoin" Query (index-time join)
functionality (which we canno
what do u mean "programmatically"? modify codes of solr? becuase solr is
not like lucene, it only provide http interfaces for its users other than
java api
if you want to modify solr, you can find codes in SolrCore
private final LinkedList> _searchers = new
LinkedList>();
and _searcher is current
What I think was mentioned on this a bit ago is that the index stops
working if one of the "nodes" goes down unless its a replica.
You have 2 "nodes" running with numShards=2? Thus if one goes down the
entire index is inoperable. In the future I'm hoping this changes such
that the index cluster co
OK, I've found this posting from 2009:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/excluding-certain-terms-from-facet-counts-when-faceting-based-on-indexed-terms-of-a-field-td501104.html
But this
facet.field={!terms=WORDTOEXCLUDE}content
approach also only shows me the counting of the word I want to exc
Maybe the index is to big and you need to add more memory to the JVM via
the -Xmx parameter. See also
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#OutOfMemoryErrors
Daniel
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:01 AM, C.Yunqin <345804...@qq.com> wrote:
> sometimes when i search a simple word ,like "i
Hi,
I am using a solr.StopFilterFactory in a query filter for a text_general
field (here: content). It works fine, when I query the field for the
stopword, then I am getting no results.
But I am also doing a facet.field=content call to get the words which are
used in the text. What I am trying to
Hi Stefan,
The score isn't "moved" from the "from" side to the "to" side and as far as
I know there isn't a way to configure the scoring of the joined documents.
The Solr join query isn't a real join (like in sql) and should be used as
filtering mechanism. The best way is to achieve that is to put
Hi folks,
where and when is the next Eurocon scheduled?
I read something about denmark and autumn 2012(i don't know where *g*).
Best regards and thanks
Vadim
28 matches
Mail list logo
