On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> How large will the transaction log grow, and how long should it be kept
> around?
We keep around enough logs to satisfy a minimum of 100 updates
lookback. Unneeded log files are deleted automatically.
When a hard commit is done, we create
Right. My situation is simple, I have a 32G dump of
Wikipedia data in a big XML file. I can parse it and
dump it into a (local) Solr instance at 5-7K
records/second. But it's stupid-simple, just a few
fields and no database involved. Much of the 32G
is XML. But that serves to illustrate
that the si
What's your secret?
OK, that question is not the kind recommended in the UsingMailingLists
suggestions, so I will write again soon with a description of my data and what
I am trying to do, and ask more specific questions. And I don't mean to hijack
the thread, but I am in the same boat as the p
I think you have to walk the term positions and offsets, look in the
stored field, and find the terms that matched. Which is exactly what
highlighting does. And this will only find the actual terms in the
text, no synonyms. So if you search for Sempranillo and find
Sempranillo in some wines and Tem
Jay:
I've seen the this question go 'round before, but don't remember
a satisfactory solution. Are you talking on a per-document basis
here? If so, I vaguely remember it being possible to do something
with highlighting, just counting the tags returned after highlighting.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Feb 2
You have to tell us a lot more about what you're trying to do. I can
import 32G in about 20 minutes, so obviously you're doing
something different than I am...
Perhaps you might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Suneel wrote:
> Hi
Well, you can give it a try, I don't know if anyone's done that
before. And you're on your own, I haven't a clue what
the results would be...
Sorry I can't be more help here...
Erick
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:44 PM, bing wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I am using
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.TikaLa
Please backport to 3x.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> This should be fixed in trunk by LUCENE-2566
>
> QueryParser: Unary operators +,-,! will not be treated as operators if
> they are followed by whitespace.
>
> -Yonik
> lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 a
Hi,
As you've asked.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3165
If you have any questions or need more details I can debug this problem
more.
Agnieszka
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 10:11 PM
> To: solr-user
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> "Unfortunately, Apache Solr still uses this horrible code in a lot of
> places, leaving us with a major piece of work undone. Major parts of
> Solr’s facetting and filter caching need to be rewritten to work per
> atomic segment! For those im
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I.e. just do if(!acceptDocs.get(doc)) return false; at
> the top?
Yep, that should do it.
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
Boston May 7-10
I just got done reading
http://www.searchworkings.org/blog/-/blogs/uwe-says%3A-is-your-reader-atomic
and was specifically interested in the following line
"Unfortunately, Apache Solr still uses this horrible code in a lot of
places, leaving us with a major piece of work undone. Major parts of
Solr
I am assuming you meant should not be returned right? I basically
return a filtered doc id set and do the following
return new FilteredDocIdSet(startingFilter.getDocIdSet(readerCtx, acceptDocs)) {
@Override
public boolean match(int doc) {
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade an application I have from an old snapshot of
> solr to the latest stable trunk and see that the constructor for
> Filter has changed, specifically there is another parameter named
> acceptDocs, the API says the followin
I'm trying to upgrade an application I have from an old snapshot of
solr to the latest stable trunk and see that the constructor for
Filter has changed, specifically there is another parameter named
acceptDocs, the API says the following
acceptDocs - Bits that represent the allowable docs to match
Hi Chitra,
You can download the distribution using the details given here-
http://siren.sindice.com/download.html
License has been changed to AGPL3.0
Source code is available here- https://github.com/rdelbru/SIREn/
- Anuj
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:45 PM, chitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would
thi is the problem!
Becaus in my root there is a url!
I write you my step-by-step configuration of nutch:
(I use cygwin because I work on windows)
*1. Extract the Nutch package*
*2. Configure Solr*
(*Copy the provided Nutch schema from directory apache-nutch-1.0/conf to
directory apache-solr-1.3
17 matches
Mail list logo
