Re: disable stemming on query parser.

2011-12-18 Thread meghana
Thanks Dmitry for your reply... i tried this out... it is working fine, but still we are in search of any less costly solution , if there's any. bcoz if i use copy field, it almost doubles my index file size. I don't know if it can be applicable or not , but i am thinking of to make a query par

Re: Poor performance on distributed search

2011-12-18 Thread Erick Erickson
Here's another test. Add &debugQuery=on to your query and post the results. I believe you'll find that the QTime parameter returned in the packet is quite small. That is the amount of time spent in the query, NOT the time spent reading the docs form disk to return. And if that number remains small

Re: NRT or similar for Solr 3.5?

2011-12-18 Thread vikram kamath
I followed the steps and they worked fine for me ... On further investigation I found that I had not changed the *solr.war* file in myapp/*webapps* folder to the *solr.war* with ranking algorithm .. @Steven check that out Thanks Nagendra Regards Vikram Kamath On 17 December 2011 22:35, Nagend

Re: multi value field search

2011-12-18 Thread Lee Carroll
You could use a synonyms file for the alternative names. That way you do not need to store only index the alternatives. For faceting use a field were the analysis chain does not use the synonyms filter. For search the analysis chain will. You also get the benefit of only storing the normative value