Hi all
Nowadays our solr server is frequently down.
Because our user send very long and complex queries with asterisk and near
operator.
Sometimes near operator exceeds 1,000 and keywords almost include asterisk.
If such query is sent to server, jvm memory is full. (our jvm memory
allocates 110G.)
Hi Cody,
Thanks for the reply.
Please find the detail of that I am doing.
Yes, I am using dataimport handler and the code snippet of it from
solrconfig.xml is given below.
data-config.xml
The data-config.xml is give below.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Artem Lokotosh wrote:
> >How big are the documents you return (how many fields, avg KB per doc,
> etc.)?
> I have a following schema in my solr configuration name="field1" type="text" indexed="true" stored="false"/> name="field2" type="text" indexed="true" stored
I have a corpus that has a lot of identical or nearly identical documents.
I'd like to return only the unique ones (excluding the "nearly identical"
which are redirects). I notice that all the identical/nearly identicals
have identical Solr scores. How can I tell Solr to throw out all the
success
Hi,
I install Apache solr and integrate it on a drupal website. Everythings
works perfectly. The default search operator is OR, so I changed it in my
schema.xml as :
But, it seems no working. For example, when I search : "bakery california",
solr return all the results contains "bakery" OR "cali
Hi,
I tried with preserveOriginal="1" and reindex too but still no result.
Thanks,
Umesh
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n3532405...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 2:54 PM, Uomesh wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > case insesitive search is not working
Hello,
We'll need more information please. How are you indexing the documents?
DataImportHandler? Xml Updates?
Can you show us the relevant parts of your schema? (Field definition and
data type for the field)
Are you getting any error messages in the log files?
Tell us more about your environme
Hello,
I'm working on using trigrams for similarity matching on some data, where
there's a canonical name and lots of personalised variants, e.g.:
canonical: "My Wonderful Thing"
variant: "My Wonderful Thing (for Matt Patterson)"
Using the pg_trgm
(http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What's_new_in
>How big are the documents you return (how many fields, avg KB per doc, etc.)?
I have a following schema in my solr configuration
27M–30M docs and 12-15 GB for each shard, 0.5KB per doc
>Does performance get much better if you only request top 100, or top>10
>documents instead of top 1000?
>> Can you merge, e.g. 3 shards together or is it much effort for your
>> team?>Yes, we can merge. We'll try to do this and review how it will works
Merge does not help :(I've tried to merge two shards in one, three
shards in one, but results are similar to results first configuration
with 30 shar
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Geetu Ambwani
> Date: November 23, 2011 2:52:38 PM EST
> To: solr-user-i...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Clustering and FieldType
>
> Hi
> Trying to use carrot2 for clustering search results. I have it setup except
> it seems to treat the
Hi,
It is observed that highlighting of search results is taking too much time
especially for highlighting terms for archived files like *.gz, *.tar, *.zip.
What could be the reason behind it ? Is it because these files are unzipped and
then highlighted from the index during display time ?
Or is
On 22 November 2011 14:28, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Why do you need spaces in the replacement?
>
> Try pattern="\+" replacement="plus" - it will cause the transformed
> charstream to contain as many tokens as the original and avoid the
> highlighting crash.
I tried that, it still crashes.
Replacin
Hi all,
I am indexing a table that has a field by the name of solr_keywords of type
text in mysql. And it contains null values also. While creating index in
solr, this field is not getting indexed.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
Hi,
We are running Solr-Lucene 4.0-SNAPSHOT (1199777M - hudson - 2011-11-09
14:58:50) on severel servers running:
64bit Debian Squeeze (6.0.3)
OpenJDK6 (b18-1.8.9-0.1~squeeze1)
Tomcat 6.028 (6.0.28-9+squeeze1)
Some of the servers have 48G RAM and in that case java have 16G (-Xmx16g) and
some o
Any other Suggestion.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Rahul Mehta wrote:
> Yes, I tried with specifiying hl.fl=field1, and field1 is indexed and
> stored.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> > oh sorry forgot to tell you that i
>> > added &hl.usePhraseHighlighter=tru
Yes, I tried with specifiying hl.fl=field1, and field1 is indexed and
stored.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > oh sorry forgot to tell you that i
> > added &hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true this
> > also , but still no result is coming .
>
> Did you specify field1 in hl.fl p
> oh sorry forgot to tell you that i
> added &hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true this
> also , but still no result is coming .
Did you specify field1 in hl.fl parameter?
Plus you need you mark field1 as indexed="true" and stored="true" to enable
highlighting.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsB
oh sorry forgot to tell you that i added &hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true this
also , but still no result is coming .
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > I passed &hl.highlightMultiTerm=true in request ,* but
> > still field1 is not
> > coming in hightlighting.*
> >
> >
> http:
> I passed &hl.highlightMultiTerm=true in request ,* but
> still field1 is not
> coming in hightlighting.*
>
> http://localhsot:8983/solr/select?q=field1:[5000%20TO%206000]&fl=field2&hl=on&rows=5&wt=json&indent=on&hl.fl=field3&hl.highlightMultiTerm=true
>
As wiki says "If the SpanScorer is also
Hi Ahmet,
I passed &hl.highlightMultiTerm=true in request ,* but still field1 is not
coming in hightlighting.*
http://localhsot:8983/solr/select?q=field1:[5000%20TO%206000]&fl=field2&hl=on&rows=5&wt=json&indent=on&hl.fl=field3&hl.highlightMultiTerm=true
I am using solr 3.1.
is i need to install
Okay, thanks for reply.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2011, at 09:56 , Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> >
> >> is this is the trunk of solr 4.0 ,
> >> can't i implement in solr 3.1 .?
> >
> > Author of the patch would know answer to this. But why not use trunk?
>
> I
> I want to have result of a range query with highlighted
> Result.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.highlightMultiTerm
> Hi Erik ,
> I am sorry , i did not get you exactly. do you tries to say
> that tilde (~)
> works for single term only.
> Say for ex. i have sentence like "i like solr speed for
> searching." and i
> try to search with slor~ , then it will not work bcoz it
> "inside of phrases"
> ? or i misunderst
Hello,
I want to have result of a range query with highlighted Result.
e.g. i have this query
http://localhsot:8983/solr/select?q=field1:[5000%20TO%206000]&fl=field2&hl=on&rows=5&wt=json&indent=on&hl.fl=field3
is not giving any result in hightliting.
Please suggest how can i get the result?
--
Hi Erik ,
I am sorry , i did not get you exactly. do you tries to say that tilde (~)
works for single term only.
Say for ex. i have sentence like "i like solr speed for searching." and i
try to search with slor~ , then it will not work bcoz it "inside of phrases"
? or i misunderstood you. plz clari
is this for wildcard search and search for misspell words. i need the same
to do in my application.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/complex-phrase-plugin-install-tp3533123p3533182.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> I want to install complex phrase plugin this one.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?focusedCommentId=12923982&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12923982
>
> I had done following step and got an error :
'mvn package' works for me. (Apac
Hi,
I want to install complex phrase plugin this one.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?focusedCommentId=12923982&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12923982
I had done following step and got an error :
- configure maven path variable
The default query parser in Solr is the "lucene" one. q=term~
But there is nothing that automatically makes terms fuzzy with the ~ at the
end. (and fuzzy queries only work on individual terms, not terms inside "of
phrases").
Erik
On Nov 24, 2011, at 03:08 , meghana wrote:
> okey,
On Nov 23, 2011, at 09:56 , Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> is this is the trunk of solr 4.0 ,
>> can't i implement in solr 3.1 .?
>
> Author of the patch would know answer to this. But why not use trunk?
I spent a fair bit of time yesterday on making a 3.x compatible patch but have
not completed th
Thanks, it looks great!
In the nearby future i will give it a try.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-terms-performance-problem-tp3351352p3533066.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
okey, i am not very much aware of it , can i use lucene query parser with
solr and make this fuzzy search possible?
Erik Hatcher-4 wrote
>
> Sure... if you're using the "lucene" query parser and put a ~ after every
> term in the query :)
>
> But that would mean that either the users or your appl
33 matches
Mail list logo
