Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
What you saying is interesting; so are you suggesting that optimizations
should be done usually when there not many updates. Also can you please
point out further under what conditions optimizations might be beneficial.
Thanks.
On 11 November 2011 20:30, Mark Mil
Oh ok. Thanks.
Ankita
On 13 November 2011 07:56, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You currently have to handle it programmatically. They are entirely
> separate
> Solr instances for all that they talk to each other, there's no way
> currently
> to just hand of the new document and have Solr "do the righ
Hi,
Reloading the index works. Thanks
Ankita
On 11 November 2011 19:19, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You can always put the shards in the URL.
>
> I don't know whether reloading the core will accomplish this,
> you might check that out. See:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#RELOAD
>
> Best
>
and changes are : file content, maybe I change its author and headers
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/delta-import-of-rich-documents-like-word-and-pdf-files-tp3502039p3505951.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for your reply Mr. Erick
All I want to do is that I have indexed some of my pdf files and doc files.
Now, any changes I make to them, I want a delta-import(incremental) so that
I do not have to re index whole document by full import . Only changes made
to these documents should get updated.
Hi there,
I'm running into a problem, where queries that are distributed among multiple
shards don't return binary field data properly.
If I hit a single core, the XML response to my HTTP request contains the
expected data.
If I hit the request handler that's configured to distribute the reque
There's nothing built into Solr that lets you do this automatically. About
the best you can do is probably a delete by query going back some fixed
time interval. So rather than keeping the last N documents, you keep
documents that are, say, no more than 1 month old (or whatever you
determine your i
I think it is best the person who commits this to trunk makes a new issue.
I am not a programmer, so I don't want to mess things up.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Preventing-DIH-to-stop-on-error-tp3496436p3504938.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
Hi Yury,
thank you very much for your quick reply. Currently I have a timestamp field
(solr.DateField) and every time I add a document I use "NOW" for the
timestamp field. I only commit documents on the core every four hours. This
works fine with the timestamp since I can use "NOW". However, I cou
SolrDispatchFilter is where HTTP headers get set, and currently there isn't
really any flexibility on Solr response writers being able to affect HTTP
headers. (note here that it isn't necessarily true that Solr requests are
happening over HTTP, so that's not always a given)
You could come up w
10 matches
Mail list logo