I don't know anything about LifeRay (never heard of it), but it sounds like
you've actually figured out what you need to know about LifeRay, all you've got
left is: "how to replicate the writer solr server content into the readers."
This should tell you how:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRepl
Stephane -
Also - I don't think even with v.properties=velocity.properties that it'd be
picked up from the /conf directory the way the code is loading it
using SolrResourceLoader. The .properties file would need to be in your JAR
file for your custom tool (or in the classpath somehow seen by t
Hi,
We are using solr 1.4.1 and we need to sort our results by distance. We have
lat lons for each document in the response and our reference point.
Is it possible? I read about the spatial plugin but the does range searching:
http://blog.jayway.com/2010/10/27/geo-search-with-spatial-solr-p
On 8/12/2011 3:32 PM, Eric Myers wrote:
Recently started looking into solr to solve a problem created before my
time. We have a dataset consisting of 390,000,000+ records that had a
search written for it using a simple query. The problem is that the
dataset needs additional indices to keep oper
We have a 200,000,000 record index with 14 fields, and we can re-index
the entire data set in about five hours. One thing to note is that the
DataImportHandler uses one thread per entity by default. If you have a
multcore box, you can drastically speed indexing by specifying a
threadcount of n+1, w
Recently started looking into solr to solve a problem created before my
time. We have a dataset consisting of 390,000,000+ records that had a
search written for it using a simple query. The problem is that the
dataset needs additional indices to keep operating. The DBA says no go,
too large a da
I've checked in an improved TestSort that adds deleted docs and
randomizes things a lot more (and fixes the previous reliance on doc
ids not being reordered).
I still can't reproduce this error though.
Is this stock solr? Can you verify that the documents are in the
wrong order also (and not just
On 8/12/2011 1:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I am sure that I have more questions, but I may be able to answer a
lot of them myself if I can see better examples.
Thought of another question. My Perl build system uses DIH for all
indexing, but with the Java rewrite I am planning to do all actions
I currently have a build system for my Solr index written in Perl. I am
in the process of rewriting it in Java. I've reached the part of the
project where I'm using SolrJ, and I have a bunch of questions. All of
the SolrJ examples I can find are too simple to answer them.
A note before I la
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fehling
>> wrote:
>>> It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
>>> As fas as I could trace it down currently:
>>>
>>> 4 docs i
Hi,
I am working with the velocity response writer, and I want to develop a
custom velocity tool.
To do so, I have written a JAVA class that looks like that:
@DefaultKey("mytool")
public class MyCustomTool {
public MyCustomTool() {
}
public String doit(Object arg) {
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
>> It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
>> As fas as I could trace it down currently:
>>
>> 4 docs in the index and a search for *:*
>>
>> sorting on field dccreato
After a whole lot of facet-wrangling, I've come up with a practical
solution that suits my situation, which is to index each triple as a
series of paths. For example, if the "shelve" process of the
"accessionWF" workflow is "completed," it gets indexed as:
accessionWF
accessionWF:shelve
accessionW
HI Peter
I found the issue,
Actually we were getting this exception because of JVM space. I allocated
512 xms and 1024 xmx .. finally increased the time limit for write lock to
20 secs .. things are working fine ... but still it did not help ...
On closely analysis of doc which we were indexing,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fehling
wrote:
> It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
> As fas as I could trace it down currently:
>
> 4 docs in the index and a search for *:*
>
> sorting on field dccreator_sort in descending order
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select
Hello.
I'm having a Solr running within Tomcat7 and Tomcat is closing at
fixed hours, everytime is a different hour. catalina.log doesn't show
anything other than a clean tomcat shutdown (no exception or
anything). I would really apreciate some advice on how to debug this.
Tomcat doesn't run anyt
Spellchecker works fine, but when using spellcheck.q it gives following
exception (queryAnalyzerFieldType is defined if that would matter).
Is it bug or am I doing something wrong?
2011-08-12 17:30:54,368 java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckCompon
Hi Johnny,
Sorting on a multivalued field has never really worked in Solr.
Solr versions <= 1.4.1 allowed it, but there was a change that an error
occurred and that the sorting might not be what you expect.
>From Solr 3.1 and up sorting on a multivalued isn't allowed and a http 400
is returned.
D
On 8/12/2011 12:52 AM, nagarjuna wrote:
Hi i have queried solr to retrieve information from database now i have to
integrate with web page...i dont know how to implement this please help
me...
actually i have one jsp page which is having search field and search
button now i need to get the
This is both an FYI for the list so the issue gets documented and a suggestion
for the developers. I thought about a JIRA, and would be happy to submit one,
but the issue is pretty environment-specific, so I have not done so at this
point.
In testing Solr 3.3 under WebSphere Application Server
> Hi i have queried solr to retrieve
> information from database now i have to
> integrate with web page...i dont know how to implement this
> please help
> me...
>
> actually i have one jsp page which is having
> search field and search
> button now i need to get the results from solr in the
It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
As fas as I could trace it down currently:
4 docs in the index and a search for *:*
sorting on field dccreator_sort in descending order
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?fsv=true&sort=dccreator_sort%20desc&indent=on&version=2.2&q=*%3A*&
Hi Markus,
thanks for your answer.
I'm using Solr. 4.0 and jetty now and observe the behavior and my error logs
next week.
tomcat can be a reason, we will see, i'll report.
I'm indexing WITHOUT batches, one doc after another. But i would try out the
batch indexing as well as
retry indexing faulty
hi
i am using nutch 1.2. in my crawl-urlfilter.txt, i am specifying URLs to be
skipped. i am giving some patterns that need to be skipped but it is not
working
e.g.
-^http://([a-z0-9]*\.)*domain.com
+^http://([a-z0-9]*\.)*domain.com/([0-9-a-z])*.html
-^http://([a-z0-9]*\.)*domain.com/([a-z/])*
-
Hi,
Currently I am indexing documents by directly adding files as
'req.addFile(fi);' or by sending the content of the file like
'req.addContentStream(stream);' using solrj.
Assume, if the solrj client & Solr server are in different network (ie, Solr
server is in remote location) I need to transf
Hi All,
Please correct me if I am wrong, but when I am trying to insert a document
into Solr which was previously index, it overwrites the current key.
Is there a way to change the behaviour,
1. I don't want Solr to override but on the other hand it should ignore the
entry
2. Also, i
Thanks for your reply Staszek,
Of course, the field has to be stored. I forgot to mention that I already
updated the schema for that. I also checked that data was effectiveley stored
in that field.
Anyway, I tried to reproduce it on a fresh Solr install and clustering works
well. ;-)
Pablo
Hi,
There is no direct solution, you have to create single value field(s)
to create search. I am aware of two workarounds:
- you can use a random or a given (e.g. the first) instance of the
multiple values of the field, and that would be your sortable field.
- you can create two sortable fields:
Hi,
I am having one problem while using the fuzzy search from query.
I have two fields in my SOLR output, one field is endNgramed and other one
is a normal Integer field which will have my customized score for that
document.
I have a handler[myhandler] which by default will sort the documents ba
Hi,
I am currently using SOLR 1.4.1, With this version sorting working fine even
in multivalued field.
Now I am planning to upgrade my SOLR version from 1.4.1 --> 3.3.0, In this
latest version sorting is not working on multivauled field.
So I am in unable to upgrade my SOLR due to this drawback.
Firewall? Proxy?
> I am new user and I have SOLR installed. I can use the admin page and
> query the example data.
> However, I was using nutch to load index with intranet web pages and I
> got this message.
>
> SolrIndexer: starting at 2011-08-12 16:52:44
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServe
Hi Satish,
> : > > I also added the following files to my apache-solr-3.3.0\example\lib
> : > folder:
I use ICU, and I copied the jar files not into example/lib as you did,
but example/solr/lib. First I had to create that directory. It works
for me both under 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. In multicore setup
Hi Pablo,
The reason clustering doesn't work with the "text" field is that the field
is not stored:
For clustering to work, you'll need to keep your documents' titles and
content in stored fields.
Staszek
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:28, Pablo Queixalos wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
> I am using s
Hi folks,
I'm writing here again (beside Jira: SOLR-2565), eventually any one can help
here:
I tested the nightly build #1595 with an new patch (2565), but NRT doesn't
work in my case.
I index 10 docs/sec, it takes 1-30sec. to see the results.
same behavior when i update an existing document.
Hi,
I am using solr-3.3.0 and carrot² clustering which works fine out of the box
with the examples doc and default solr configuration (the 'features' Field is
used as snippet).
I indexed my own documents using the embed ExtractingRequestHandler wich by
default stores contents in the '
Erick, you're right. It's working, my schema looks like this:
Thanks for helping me!!
--
View this message in cont
Thanks Yonik. It solved the issue.
On 11-Aug-2011, at 6:44 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Amit Sawhney wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am trying to sort the results on a unix timestamp using this query.
>>
>> http://url.com:8983/solr/db/select/?indent=on&version=2.1&q={!f
37 matches
Mail list logo
