Hi,
My results from solr returns about 982 documents and I use jaxb to parse them
into java objects, which takes about 469 ms, which is over my 150-200ms
threshold.
Is there a solution around this? Can I store the java objects in the index and
return them in the solr response and then seria
I am new user and I have SOLR installed. I can use the admin page and
query the example data.
However, I was using nutch to load index with intranet web pages and I
got this message.
SolrIndexer: starting at 2011-08-12 16:52:44
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
java.net.ConnectE
: In Solr the date is stored as Zulu time zone and Solrj is returning date in
: CDT timezone (jvm is picking system time zone.)
Strictly speaking, Solrj is not returning the date "in CDT timezone" ...
Date objects in java are absolute moments in time, that know nothing about
timezones.
Where t
: I copied the file apache-solr-analysis-extras-3.3.0.jar into solr's lib
: folder. Now the error is different -
...
: > > I also added the following files to my apache-solr-3.3.0\example\lib
: > folder:
Deja-Vu...
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/5967b87c6fa56fd1/error_lo
using Solr Specification Version: 4.0.0.2011.08.09.11.02.13
While trying understand scoring I noticed that "boost" is intermittently
displayed in the explain. For example, using edismax and the query string is
"q=Starbucks&qf=name.search name^2" my first result has the boost explicitly
listed in t
Hi,
We see these errors too once on a while but there is real answer on the
mailing list here except one user suspecting Tomcat is responsible (connection
time outs).
Another user proposed to limit the number of documents per batch but that, of
course, increases the number of connections made
Thant makes sense. There are actually stored fields. I was mostly just trying
to figure out how much my index size might grow. These fields I am dealing with
are large and repetitive (but mixed).
From: Erick Erickson
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Kevin Osbor
are you boosting your docs?
2011/8/8 Jason Toy
> I am trying to test out and compare different sorts and scoring.
>
> When I use dismax to search for "indie music"
> with: qf=all_lists_text&q="indie+music"&defType=dismax&rows=100
> I see some stuff that seems "irrelevant", meaning in top result
Here's an example. Since I only query this for spelling, i can lowecase both
on index and query time.
2011/8/10 nagarjuna
> Hi please help me ..
>how to ignore case while searching in solr
>
>
> ex:i need same results for the keywords abc, ABC , aBc,AbC and all the
I've been experimenting with that, but that fq wouldn't limit my facet
counts adequately. Since the document has both an accessionWF and a
digitizationWF, the fq would match (and count) the document no matter what
the status for each process.
I suppose I could do something like this:
acce
You can use like here
in this example. Check the docs about your specific SOLR version because
something has changed in the htmlstrip syntax in 1.4 and 3.x
2011/8/11 Merlin Morgenstern
> I am sorry, but I do not really understand the difference of indexed and
> returned result set.
>
> I l
Thanks for the advice everyone. I am rebuilding the index with a lowercase
field instead of string.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching For Term 'OR'
:
: I am looking for some advice on how to index and search a field that
: contains a two character state name without the query parser dying on
: the OR and also not treating it as an 'OR' Boolean operator.
fq={!term f=state}OR
...this kind of filter you don't want a query parser that has any
hi,
use the filter LowerCaseFilterFactory (don't work with string type, you must
create a new fieldtype of text type)
or use scaped forms:
\OR
\AND
I tried it a moment ago and it works.
saludos
---
Rode González
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@g
Thanks for the feedback. I'll give these a try.
Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
>I guess this is because Lucene QP is interpreting the 'OR' operator.
>You can either:
> use lowercase
> use other query parser, like the term query parser. See
>http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr
I guess this is because Lucene QP is interpreting the 'OR' operator.
You can either:
use lowercase
use other query parser, like the term query parser. See
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/search/TermQParserPlugin.html
Also, if you just removed the "or" term from the stop
Hello,
I am looking for some advice on how to index and search a field that contains
a two character state name without the query parser dying on the OR and also
not treating it as an 'OR' Boolean operator.
For example:
The following query with a filter query key/value pair causes an exc
Hi There,
I am IT and work on a project based on Liferary 605 with solr-3.2 like the
indexer/search engine.
I presently have only one server that is indexing and searching but reading the
Liferay Support suggestions they point to the need of having:
- 2 to n SOLR read-server for searching from
I downloaded the official build (4.0) and I've been customizing it for my
needs. I'm not really sure how to use these scripts. Is there somewhere in
Hudson where I can apply these scripts or something?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hudson-build-issues-tp3
Nope. The 'text' field will just have the 'titulo' contents. To have both, you
would have to do something like this:
-Michael
Hi all.
if in schema.xml we put something like:
Can I expect that in 'text' field I have the 'title' and the 'titulo'
contents ?
thanks ;)
Note: in our app, the titles refer to books that can be named in several
different ways .
---
Rode González
_
On 8/10/2011 2:52 PM, Eugeny Balakhonov wrote:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: deltaQuery has no column to resolve to
declared primary key pk='T1_ID_RECORD, T2_ID_RECORD'
I have analyzed the source code of DIH. I found that in the DocBuilder class
collectDelta() method works with value of en
Hello,
I posted on the Lucene Forums, and someone told me to e-mail it here.
Instead of writing again my question here, I take the liberty to link my post.
Its about SolR, autocompletion, Spellchecking and "case-sentivieness" (?).
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolR-Spellchecking-amp-Autoco
Thinking aloud and grateful for sparing ..
I need to support high commit rate (low update latency) in a master
slave setup and I have a bad feelings about it, even with disabling
warmup and stripping everything down that slows down refresh.
I will try it anyway, but I started thinking about "back
I know it seems like my problem may not be the same as the original
poster, but in investigating this, I did find this Jetty issue that
may be related: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-1377
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr
wrote:
Hi,
Can you keep your hierarchy flat in SOLR and then use filter queries
(fq=wf:accessionWF) inside you facet queries (facet.field=status)?
Or is the requirement to have one single facet query producing the
hierarchical facet counts?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Michael B. Klein wrote:
> H
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Amit Sawhney wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to sort the results on a unix timestamp using this query.
>
> http://url.com:8983/solr/db/select/?indent=on&version=2.1&q={!frange%20l=0.25}query($qq)&qq=nokia&sort=unix-timestamp%20desc&start=0&rows=10&qt=dismax&wt=dis
Optimizing indexing time is a very different question.
I'm guessing your 3mins+ time you refer to is the commit time.
There are a whole host of things to take into account regarding
indexing, like: number of segments, schema, how many fields, storing
fields, omitting norms, caching, autowarming, s
Hi arian487,
You apparently are not using the official Ant build? (Maven is officially
unsupported.)
The scripts used by the Lucene and Solr Jenkins builds at the ASF are available
here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/
The ASF Jenkins jobs checkout the above direc
Thanks! I actually found a page on line that explained this.
-Rich
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Simon, Richard T
Subject: RE: Building a facet query in SolrJ
: que
Yes this was happening because of JVM heap size
But the real issue is that if our index size is growing (very high)
then indexing time is taking very long (using streaming)
earlier for indexing 15,000 docs at a time (commit after 15000 docs) , it
was taking 3 mins 20 secs time,
after deleting t
You can set default="true" in solrconfig on the JSON response writer, like this:
Or you can add json to any request handler definitions.
Erik
On Aug 11, 2011, at 07:36 , nagarjuna wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> when ever i enter search term in solr i am able to getting response in XML
> Is there a way to strip the html tags completly and not
> index them? If not,
> how to I retrieve the results without html tags?
How do you push documents to solr? You need to strip html tags before the
analysis chain. For example, if you are using Data Import Handler, you can use
HTMLStripTra
Hi,
When you get this exception with no other error or explananation in
the logs, this is almost always because the JVM has run out of memory.
Have you checked/profiled your mem usage/GC during the stream operation?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Naveen Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing st
I am sorry, but I do not really understand the difference of indexed and
returned result set.
I look on the "returned" dataset via this command:
solr/select/?q=id:533563&terms=true
which gives me html tags like this ones:
I also tried to turn on TermsComponent, but it did not change anything:
s
Hi all,
I have a particular data structure I'm trying to index into a solr document
so that I can query and facet it in a particular way, and I can't quite
figure out the best way to go about it.
One sample object is here: https://gist.github.com/1139065
The part that's tripping me up is the wor
36 matches
Mail list logo
