Hi Shawn,
the 0.05 seconds for search time at peek times (3 qps) is my target for Solr.
The numbers for solr are from Solr's statistic report page. So 39.5 seconds
average per request is definately to long and I have to change to sharding.
For FAST system the numbers for the search dispatcher ar
Hi,
Is there anyway to get numFound from csv response format? Some parameter?
Or shall I change the code for csvResponseWriter for this?
Thanks,
Pooja
I am getting following error log on trying to search. Any idea why this error
is coming. Search results are coming after a long delay.
SEVERE: org.mortbay.jetty.EofException
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpGenerator.flush(HttpGenerator.java:791)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.AbstractGenerator$
Hi,
I am new to solr. Am facing an issue wherein the highlighting of the
searchresults for matches is not working when I have set a unique field as:
id
If this is commented then highlighting starts working. I need to have a unique
field. Could someone please explain this erratic behaviour. I a
Guys, I am still stuck. Any help?
Thanks,
Satish
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> did you add the analysis-extras jar itself? thats what has this factory.
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Satish Talim
> wrote:
> > I am using Solr 3.3 on a Windows box.
> >
> > I want to
have you looked at the facet.sort parameter? The "index" value is what I
think you want.
Best
Erick
On Aug 3, 2011 7:03 PM, "Way Cool" wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> Is there anyway to sort differently for facet values? For example,
sometimes
> I want to sort facet values by their values instead of # of
Sorry, I'm on a restricted machine so can't get the precise URL. But,
there's a debug page for DIH that might allow you to see what the query
actually returns. I'd guess one of two things:
1> you aren't getting the number of rows you think.
2> you aren't committing the documents you add.
But that'
Hmmm, the only thing that comes to mind is the "join" feature being added to
Solr 4.x, but I confess I'm not entirely familiar with that functionality so
can't tell if it really solver your problem.
Other than that I'm out of ideas, but the again it's late and I'm tired so
maybe I'm not being very
As far as I know, you're right. There's no built-in way to do what you want,
especially since the fact that you're talking about different search fields
implies that the scores from the documents aren't comparable anyway. How do
you intend to combine the results for presentation to the user?
Best
I predict you'll spend a lot of time on the admin/analysis page
understanding what the various combinations of tokenizers and filters do.
Because, you see, you already have differences, to whit: your Solr schema
has LowercaseFilter and removeDuplicates.
Have you determined *why* Solr indexing is s
What version of Solr are you using? If it's a recent version, then
optimizing is not that essential, you can do it during off hours, perhaps
nightly or weekly.
As far as indexing speed, have you profiled your application to see whether
it's Solr or your indexing process that's the bottleneck? A q
Hi, guys,
Is there anyway to sort differently for facet values? For example, sometimes
I want to sort facet values by their values instead of # of docs, and I want
to be able to have a predefined order for certain facets as well. Is that
possible in Solr we can do that?
Thanks,
YH
Hello,
Can someone point me a good example or two of usage of the ShardParams
shards.start and shards.rows?
I have a Solr instance of 250M documents spread across 4 shards. And I need
to be able to reliably and quickly access the records by "page" at the request
of the user.
I understan
Hello Sharath,
Yes you can create many indexes.
See this article: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
See you,
Helton
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Sharath Jagannath
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This might be completely naive question.
>
> Could, I create more than one instance of index sets on a sin
Hey,
This might be completely naive question.
Could, I create more than one instance of index sets on a single instance of
solr server?
If so, how could I specify which schema to use and which index set to use.
I am planning to create 2 separate index set using a single solr server.
Data that n
lboutros wrote:
>
> I used Spanish stemming, put the ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory before the
> stemming filter and added it in the query part too.
>
> Ludovic.
>
My experiments with french stemmer does not yield good results with this
order. Applying the ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory before stemming
I think that Solr "multi-core" (nothing to do with CPU cores, just what
it's called in Solr) is what you're looking for.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
On 8/3/2011 2:25 PM, Mike Papper wrote:
Hi, we run several independent websites on the same machines. Each site uses
a similar codebase
Hi, we run several independent websites on the same machines. Each site uses
a similar codebase for search. Currently each site contacts its own solr
server on a slightly different port. This means of course that we are
running several solr servers (each on their own port) on the same machine. I
wo
Hi,
I am a newbie to Solr and have been trying to learn using
DataImportHandler.
I have a query in data-config.xml that fetches about 5 records when i fire
it in SQL Query manager.
However, when Solr does a full import, it is skipping 4 records and only
importing 1 record.
What could be the reason
Thanks Jonathan. I thought it would be possible via nested queries but
somehow could not get it to work.
I'll give it another shot.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Jonathan Rochkind [via Lucene] <
ml-node+3222792-952640420-221...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> There is not, and the way dismax works mak
I am working on an implementation of search within our application using
solr.
About 2 months ago we had the need to group results by a certain field.
After some searching I came across the JIRA in progress for this - field
collapsing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
It was schedul
A ha,I have found the root cause , the Solr has return the result properly
.The root cause is the SolrPHPClient, The SolrPHPClient uses
file_get_contents function for connecting to Solr by default ,this function
is not stable, usually returns http status error.
thanks for everybody who gives me
Not so much that it's a corner case in the sense of being unusual
neccesarily (I'm not sure), it's just something that fundamentally
doesn't fit well into lucene's architecture.
I'm not sure that filing a JIRA will be much use, it's really unclear
how one would get lucene to do this, it would
There's no great way to do this. I understand your problem as: It's a
multi-valued field, but you want to sort on whichever of those values
matched the query, not on the values that didn't. (Not entirely clear
what to do if the documents are in the result set becuse of a match in
an entirely di
There is not, and the way dismax works makes it not really that feasible
in theory, sadly.
One thing you could do instead is combine multiple separate dismax
queries using the nested query syntax. This will effect your relevancy
ranking possibly in odd ways, but anything that accomplishes 'mm
*Sigh*...I had thought maybe reversing it would work, but that would require
creating a whole new index, on a separate core, as the existing index is used
for other purposes. Plus, given the volume of data, that would be a big deal,
update-wise. What would be better would be to remove that parti
Hi Erick,
our two "changable" fields are used for linking between documents on
application level.
>From lucene point of view they are just two searchable fields with stored term
>vector for one of them.
Our queries will use one of this fields and a couple of fields from the
"stable" fields.
So
Hi Ron.
This is an interesting problem you have. One idea would be to create an index
with the entity relationship going in the other direction. So instead of one
to many, go many to one. You would end up with multiple documents with varying
names but repeated parent entity information -- perh
Hello,
Is there a way to apply (e)dismax mm parameter per field? If I have a query
field1:(blah blah) AND field2:(foo bar)
is there a way to apply mm only to field2?
Thanks,
Dmitriy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dismax-mm-per-field-tp3222594p3222594.html
S
Right, the search term is the sort field. I can manually sort an individual
page, but when the user clicks on the next page, the sort is "reset", visually.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Sokolov [mailto:soko...@ifactory.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 9:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apa
Although you weren't very clear about it, it sounds as if you want the
results to be sorted by a name that actually matched the query? In
general that is not going to be easy, since it is not something that can
be computed in advance and thus indexed.
-Mike
On 08/03/2011 10:39 AM, Olson, Ro
Hi all-
Well, this is a problem. I have a list of names as a multi-valued field and I
am searching on this field and need to return the results sorted. I know from
searching and reading the documentation (and getting the error) that sorting on
a multi-valued field isn't possible. Okay, so, what
Replies inline.
On 8/3/2011 2:24 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
To show that I compare apples and oranges here are my previous FAST
Search setup:
- one master server (controlling, logging, search dispatcher)
- six index server (4.25 mio docs per server, 5 slices per index)
(searching and indexing a
No I haven't. I will get the latest out of the trunk and report back.
Cheers again,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: 03 August 2011 14:51
To: Fowler, Matthew (Markets Eikon)
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
How are these fields used? Because if they're not used for searching, you could
put them in their own core and rebuild that index at your whim, then
querying that
core when you need the relationship information.
If you have a DB backing your system, you could perhaps store the info there
and query
Hmmm, if these are real responses from a solr server "at rest" (i.e.
documents not being changed between queries) then what you show
definitely looks like a bug.
That's interesting, since TestJoin implements a random test that
should cover cases like this pretty well.
I assume you are using a vers
Sure, it's possible. It's just that you have to do the work yourself ...
You could define a series of request handlers for various classes of
user and route the request to the correct handler based on that
user's attributes. You could construct the query manually based on the
user's attributes. Yo
Here's a page where you can "hire guns" that you might be interested in...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Support
Best
ERick
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Economy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this isn't the right place for this message, but it's a very
> specific role we're looking for and
Well, you're kind of stuck unfortunately. It's pretty much required that you'll
have to reindex when you add new fields if you want existing documents to
have that field.
I don't think there's any good way to use the DB to sort Solr results that would
be performant.
About using Solr as your data
Did you look at phrase fields (pf) in dismax?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, O. Klein wrote:
> I removed the post as it might confuse people.
>
> But because of analysers combining 2 words in a phrase query using shingles
> and positionfilter and the usage of dismax, I need q to be
Can we see the queries you're running and the data you expect back?
And an idea of the documents you're expecting to be matched, including
the field definitions from your schema.xml for the fields in question.
Are you using SolrJ? Just a URL in a browser?
How do you mean "manually"?
It might hel
Thanks - let me try and do this here manually later today and get back to you.
- Mark
On Aug 2, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Yatir Ben Shlomo wrote:
> Thanks A lot mark,
> Since My SolrCloud code was old I tried downloading and building the
> newest code from here
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/
Hi Yonik
Sorry for my late reply. I have been trying to get to the bottom of this
but I'm getting inconsistent behaviour. Here's an example:
Query = "pi:rcs100" - Here going to use "pid_rcs" as join
value
rcs100
rcs
G1
Emerging Market Countries
All business events rela
> Hm...
>
> No.
Can you paste output of &debugQuery=on for two queries?
Hm...
No.
2011/8/3 Gora Mohanty
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim
> wrote:
> [...]
> > I am not using dismax. I didn't find the solution for the problem. I just
> > made a full-import and the problem ended. Still odd.
> [...]
>
> Maybe you changed the type of the field i
Hello there!
I have a multicore solr with 6 different "simple" cores and somewhat
different schemas and I defined another "meta" core which I would it to be a
dispatcher: the requests are sent to "simple" cores and results are
aggregated before sending back the results to the user.
Any idea or h
OK, here is a brief on our sharded setup.
We have 10 shards, 3 per high-end Amazon machine. Majority of the searches
are done on 2 shards at most, that have the latest data in their indices. We
use logical sharding, not hash based. These two lead to a situation, where
given a user query that *will
On 02.08.2011 21:00, Shawn Heisey wrote:
...
I did try some early tests with a single large index. Performance was pretty
decent once it got warmed up, but I was worried about how it would
perform under a heavy load, and how it would cope with frequent updates. I
never really got very far with
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 18:42, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
>
> You know that Solr distro comes with a jetty with a Solr in it, right, as an
> example application? Even if you don't want to use it for some reason, that
> would probably be the best model to look at for a working jetty with solr.
Sure,
49 matches
Mail list logo
