Hi
This happened because the there are 2 jars - apache-solr-solrj-3.3.0.jar and
apache-solr-solrj-1.3.0.jar in the Apache Solr distribution. After I removed
the apache-solr-solrj-1.3.0.jar file, the code is working fine.
Thank you for your pointers!!
Best Regards,
Tejas Bavishi
-Original
There could be multiple ways of getting this done, and the exact one depends
a lot on factors like - what system are you using? How realtime the change
has to be reflected back into the system? How is the indexing/replication
done?
Usually, in cases where the tolerance is about 6hrs (i.e. your DB
have you tried multi:1 and multi:2 and multi:3 ?
2011/7/29 rajini maski
> Hi All,
>
> I have a specific requirement in the multi-valued field type.The
> requirement is as follows
>
> There is a multivalued field in each document which can have mutliple
> elements or single element.
>
> For
In etc/jetty.xml, at line 204, you should remove the comment (delete line 204
and line 218)
204
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-2-0-is-not-writing-log-tp3208945p3214774.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: fq AND fq AND fq AND (fqu OR fqu OR fqu)
:
: It would be awesome to have a syntax that creates arbitrarily complex and
: nested AND/OR combinations, but that would be a MAJOR undertaking. The logic
: I've mentioned above seems to be the most useful you could get with just
: having the one addi
Yes, that is where the problem comes! Many many thanks to everyone!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-can-not-index-F-K-tp3214246p3214666.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorry for the delay on this response Yatir - I missed this email. I need to be
more diligent ;)
You can chroot any path by tacking it on the ZooKeeper address.
So if the address is 127.0.0.1:3002, then you can use the /solr sub-tree by
using the address 127.0.0.1:3002/nestedisokay/solr
- Mark
: http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1474227/00014742271032/d424b3.htm
My money is on in solrconfig.xml...
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=maxFieldLength#/p:solr
-Hoss
I hate to be the PC guy, but seriously, did this have to be said?
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:58 AM, randohi wrote:
> One of our clients (a hot girl!)
--
E: mark.man...@gmail.com
T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic
W: www.compoundtheory.com
cf.Objective(ANZ) + Flex - Nov 17, 18 - Melbourne Aus
The content of protwords.txt:
dontstems
zwhacky
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-can-not-index-F-K-tp3214246p3214525.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/31/2011 7:29 PM, randohi wrote:
org.apache.solr.analysis.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory args:{protected:
protwords.txt luceneMatchVersion: LUCENE_33 }
Could something be going on here? What's in your "protwords.txt" ?
-Mike
The indexed contents of 100 sites were imported to solr from nutch using:
bin/nutch solrindex http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/ crawl/crawldb crawl/linkdb
crawl/segments/*
now, a solr admin search for 'photography' includes these results:
0.12570743
1.0440307
94d97f2806240d18d67cafe9c34
It is not in stopwords list. The file was indexed with the following setting:
Field Type: text_en
Properties: Indexed, Tokenized, Stored, Multivalued
Schema: Indexed, Tokenized, Stored, Multivalued
Index: Indexed, Tokenized, Stored
Position Increment Gap: 100
Index Analyzer: org.apache.solr.a
It is not in stopwords list. The file was indexed with the following setting:
Field Type: text_en
Properties: Indexed, Tokenized, Stored, Multivalued
Schema: Indexed, Tokenized, Stored, Multivalued
Index: Indexed, Tokenized, Stored
Position Increment Gap: 100
Index Analyzer: org.apache.solr.a
Indeed, the analysis will show if the term is a stop word, the term gets
removed by the stop filter, turning on verbose output shows that.
François
On Jul 31, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Shashi Kant wrote:
> Check your Stop words list
> On Jul 31, 2011 6:25 PM, "François Schiettecatte"
> wrote:
>> That
Check your Stop words list
On Jul 31, 2011 6:25 PM, "François Schiettecatte"
wrote:
> That seems a little far fetched, have you checked your analysis?
>
> François
>
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 4:58 PM, randohi wrote:
>
>> One of our clients (a hot girl!) brought this to our attention:
>> In this docume
That seems a little far fetched, have you checked your analysis?
François
On Jul 31, 2011, at 4:58 PM, randohi wrote:
> One of our clients (a hot girl!) brought this to our attention:
> In this document there are many f* words:
>
> http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1474227/00014742271032/
: I am using apache solr 3.3 on windows 7 with JDK 1.6.
First question: what version of SolrJ are you using? is it also 3.3?
: At the line, QueryResponse queryResponse = solrServer.query(query1);
: Class Cast Exception is thrown and no data is fetched. I suspect this
: has something to do wit
: page is loaded. Then I found a problem: some request will return
: statusCode:0 and QTime:0, The solr has accepted the request, but It does not
: return a result document. If I send each request one by one manually ,It
: will return the result. But If I send the request frequently in a very
:
One of our clients (a hot girl!) brought this to our attention:
In this document there are many f* words:
http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1474227/00014742271032/d424b3.htm
and we have indexed it with latest version of Solr (ver 3.3). But, we if we
search F**K, it does not return the docum
The first thing that comes to mind is to check whether you are
committing after every insert. A number of things may happen when you
commit, including merges, rebuilding the spelling dictionary (is this
still true in 3.3? maybe not). It's better to commit after a batch of
inserts.
-Mike
O
Thanks for reply ,the Solr server uses dataimporthandler, it can import 60
thousands records(about 4G index files) properly in about 30 minutes. So I
think the memory is enough.
Do you know some performance factors about SolrPhpClient ?
2011/7/31 O. Klein
> I don't have much experience with S
I don't have much experience with Solr on windows, but have you given Solr
enough java heap size etc?
Im assuming you are running Solr stand alone. Maybe try and run it in
Tomcat?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-request-filter-and-indexing-process-tp32129
thank you for reply my message. But the developer machine is a new Dell PC
with windows7 and 4G memory.
If I add 10 document through SolrPHPClient's addDocuments function with XML
format, It will takens about more than five seconds.
This speed must be unacceptable to our user.
I have already disabl
Might wanna check your resources, like memory and diskspace.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-request-filter-and-indexing-process-tp3212907p3213512.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
I am using apache solr 3.3 on windows 7 with JDK 1.6.
I am facing very strange problem. My code makes a query to the solr server in
Java, the code is pasted below:
public QueryResponse getSearchResponse(String query, String url,
String...facets){
try{
SolrQuery que
26 matches
Mail list logo
