Thank you Mike.
So I understand that now. But what about the other items that have values
on both size? They don't work at all.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Sokolov [mailto:soko...@ifactory.com]
Sent: 2011年5月27日 10:23 下午
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: alucard001
Subject: Re: sol
Is LucidWorks source no longer available? In earlier versions their
source code was available but after the latest install I can not seem to
find it?
Where can one find the KStemmer source for 4.0?
On 5/12/11 11:28 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
I backported a Lucid KStemmer version from solr 4.0 which I found
somewhere.
Just changed from
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.CharArraySet; // solr4.0
to
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.CharArra
are there any updates on this? any third party apps that can make this work
as expected?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Dyer, James wrote:
> Tanner,
>
> Currently Solr will only make suggestions for words that are not in the
> dictionary, unless you specifiy "spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true".
I know this question has been asked before but I think my situation is a
little different. Basically I need to do custom scores that the traditional
function queries simply won't allow me to do. I actually need to hit
another server from Java (passing in a bunch of things mostly relying on how
to
Thanks Mike,
I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2553 for this.
It's exciting to hear a workable implementation might be possible!
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Can you open a Lucene issue (against the new grouping m
I managed to get a thread dump during a slow commit:
"resin-tcp-connection-*:5062-129" Id=12721 in RUNNABLE total cpu
time=391530.ms user time=390620.ms
at java.lang.String.intern(Native Method)
at
org.apache.lucene.util.SimpleStringInterner.intern(SimpleStringInterner.java:74)
at org.apac
We verified with the fiddler proxy server that when we use the Java
CommonsHttpSolrServer to communicate with our Solr server we are not able to
get the client to post a message back to Solr. The result is that we
can't force the tail end of a batch job to commit after it has run and we can't
On May 27, 2011, at 1:04 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> The letter f should be capital
Hah! Well-spotted! Thanks.
-==-
Jack Repenning
Technologist
Codesion Business Unit
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
office: +1 650.228.2562
twitter: http://twitter.com/jr
Nobody?
Please, help
edua...@calandra.com.br
17/05/2011 16:13
Please respond to
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
cc
Subject
Pivot with Stats (or Stats with Pivot)
Hi All,
Is it possible to get stats (like Stats Component: min ,max, sum, count,
miss
Hello,
I am using the latest nightly build of Solr 4.0 and I would like to
use grouping/field collapsing while maintaining compatibility with my
current parser. I am using the regular webinterface to test it, the
same commands like in the wiki, just with the field names matching my
dataset.
Grou
Can you open a Lucene issue (against the new grouping module) for
this?
I think this is a compelling use case that we should try to support.
In theory, with the "general" two-pass grouping collector, this should
be possible, but will require three passes, and we also must
generalize the 2nd pass
I'm still not having any luck with this. Has anyone actually gotten this to
work so far? I feel like I've followed the directions to the letter but it
just doesn't work.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> I looked at the patch page and saw the files that wer
For this, I ended up just changing it to string and using "abcdefg*" to
match. That seems to work so far.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into some confusion with the way edgengram works. I have the
> field set up as:
>
> position
On 5/27/2011 6:48 AM, Romi wrote:
> What is the benifit of setting autocommit in solrconfig.xml.
> i read somewhere that these settings control how often pending updates will
> be automatically pushed to the index.
> does it mean if solr server is running then it automaticaly starts indexing
> pro
Did you try pivot?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On May 27, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Martijn Laarman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if this issue had already been raised.
>
> We currently have a use case where nested field collapsing would be really
> helpful
>
> I.e Collapse on field X then Collap
Hi,
I was wondering if this issue had already been raised.
We currently have a use case where nested field collapsing would be really
helpful
I.e Collapse on field X then Collapse on Field Y within the groups returned
by field X
The current behavior of specifying multiple fields seem to be retu
You're up against a couple of real limitations with Solr's spell checking. The
first limitation is that you can only use 1 dictionary per query.
The second limitation is that if a word is in the dictionary it never tries to
correct it. This will happen even if you *don't* combine your two di
Hi Bob,
Hmm... I don't think this approach will scale with bigger and more documents :(
Thanks for your help though; I think I should take a look at customizing
highlight component to achieve this...
Thanks,
Jeff
On May 27, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Bob Sandiford
wrote:
> The only thing I can th
The "*" endpoint for range terms wasn't implemented yet in 1.4.1 As a
workaround, we use very large and very small values.
-Mike
On 05/27/2011 12:55 AM, alucard001 wrote:
Hi all
I am using SOLR 1.4.1 (according to solr info), but no matter what date
field I use (date or tdate) defined in def
Hello,
I am in an odd position. The application server I use has built-in
integration with SOLR. Unfortunately, its native capabilities are
fairly limited, specifically, it only supports a standard/pre-defined
set of fields which can be indexed. As a result, it has left me
kludging how I wor
Thanks I was looking exactly for this.
I needed to spli tokens based on comma.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
> set generateWordParts=1 on wordDelimiter or use
> PatternTokenizerFactory to split on commas
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#sol
I've found the same issue.
As long as I know, the only solution is to create a copy field which combines
both-fields values and facet on this field.
If one of the fields has a set of distinct values known in advance and its
cardinality c is not too big, it isn't a great problem: you can do with c
Hi,
I was wondering if this issue had already been raised.
We currently have a use case where nested field collapsing would be really
helpful
I.e Collapse on field X then Collapse on Field Y within the groups returned
by field X
The current behavior of specifying multiple fields seem to be retur
Sorry my question was not clear.
when I get data from database, some field contains some html special chars,
and what i want to do is just convert them automatically.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, anass talby
> wrote:
> > Is there any wa
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Rahul Warawdekar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Solr 3.1 for one of our search based applications.
> We are using DIH to index our data and TikaEntityProcessor to index
> attachments.
> Currently we are running into an issue while extracting content from one of
>
I'm using 3.1 now. Indexing lasts for a few hours, and have big
plain size. Getting all documents would be rather slow :(
> Not with 1.4, but apparently there is a patch for trunk. Not
> sure if it is in 3.1.
> If you are on 1.4, you could first query Solr to get the data
> for the document
2011/5/27 Denis Kuzmenok :
> Hi.
>
> I have and indexed database which is indexed few times a day and
> contain tinyint flag (like is_enabled, is_active, etc), and content
> isn't changed too often, but flags are.
> So if i index via post.jar only flags then entire document is deleted
> a
Hi.
I have and indexed database which is indexed few times a day and
contain tinyint flag (like is_enabled, is_active, etc), and content
isn't changed too often, but flags are.
So if i index via post.jar only flags then entire document is deleted
and there's only unique key and flags.
Is
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, anass talby wrote:
> Is there any way to render html entities in DIH for a specific field?
[...]
This does not make too much sense: What do you mean by
"rendering HTML entities". DIH just indexes, so where would
it render HTML to, even if it could?
Please take a
What is the benifit of setting autocommit in solrconfig.xml.
i read somewhere that these settings control how often pending updates will
be automatically pushed to the index.
does it mean if solr server is running then it automaticaly starts indexing
process if it finds any updates in database???
Is there any way to render html entities in DIH for a specific field?
Thanks
--
Anass
I wanted to have the basic idea of setting these parameters in solrconfig.xml
what actually writeLockTimeout and commitLockTimeout indicates here.
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-the-need-of-setting-writeLockTimeout-and-c
i removed
string
elevate.xml
from solrconfig.xml but it is showing the following exception:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.identifyPk(DataImporter.java:152)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.(DataI
Remove the component configuration from your solrconfig.
> Hi, in my indexed document i do not want a uniqueKey field, but when i do
> not give any uniqueKey in schema.xml then it shows an exception
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: QueryElevationComponent requires the
> schema to have a uni
test
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/test-tp2992199p2992199.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, in my indexed document i do not want a uniqueKey field, but when i do not
give any uniqueKey in schema.xml then it shows an exception
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: QueryElevationComponent requires the
schema to have a uniqueKeyField.
it means QueryElevationComponent requires a uniqueKey
Thanks for you answer James :)
For guys who would meet up with this problem,
http://markmail.org/thread/xce4qyzs5367yplo also speaks about this, and
reaches James' conclusion too.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Dyer, James wrote:
> This is a limitation of Lucene/Solr in that there is no way t
Got it. Actually I use solr.MappingCharFilterFactory to replace the to empty first, and use HTMLStripCharFilterFactory to get "hello" and
"solr".
For future reference, here is part of schema.xml
...
In mappings.txt (2 lines)
"" => ""
Restart Solr
Hi all
here is what I have been trying and the problem
I am trying to see how many times a single word appears in a field.
Basically, I have a field called universal, and lets say the field is like
this:
"car house road age sex school education education tree garden"
and I am searching useing t
Hello,
I have to perform range queries agains a date field. It is a TrieDateField, and
I'm already using it for sorting. Hence, there will be already en entry in the
FieldCache for it.
According to:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/07/06/ranges-over-functions-in-solr-14/
frange queries
I would expect that it doesn't understand CDATA and thinks of
everything between < and > as a 'tag'.
Best Regards,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ellery Leung wrote:
> I have an XML string like this:
>
>
>
> encoding="UTF-8"?>
>
>
>
> By using HTMLStripTransformer, I expect to
That uber dictionary is not what i want. I get also suggestions form the
where in the what. An example:
what where
chelseaLondon
Soccerclub Bondon London
When i type "soccerclub london" i want the suggestion from the wha
> >
The letter f should be capital. copyfield =>copyField
Are you talking about a facet query or a facet field?
If it's a facet query, I don't get what's going on.
If it's a facet field... well, if it's a fixed set of words you're interested
in, filter the query to only those words and you'll get counts only for them.
If you just need to filter out comm
mm ok. I configure 2 spellcheckers:
spell_what
spell_what
true
spellchecker_what
spell_where
spell_where
true
spellchecker_where
H
which analyzer do you use for indexing ? You could exclude those stop words
during indexing
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Jasneet Sabharwal <
jasneet.sabhar...@ngicorporation.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I do a facet query on my data
Hi
When I do a facet query on my data, it shows me a list of all the words
present in my database with their count. Is it possible to not get the
results of common words like a, an, the, http and so one but only get
the count of stuff we need like microsoft, ipad, solr, etc.
--
Thanx& Regar
No such issues . Successfully integrated with 1.4.1 and it works across
single index.
for f.2.facet.numFacetTerms=1 parameter it will give the distinct count
result
for f.2.facet.numFacetTerms=2 parameter it will give counts as well as
results for facets.
But this is working only across singl
I have an XML string like this:
By using HTMLStripTransformer, I expect to get 'hello,solr'.
But actual this transformer will remove ALL THE TEXT INSIDE!
Did I do something silly, or is it a bug?
Thank you
I am pretty sure it does not yet support distributed shards..
But the patch was written for 4.0... So there might be issues with running
it on 1.4.1.
On 5/26/11 11:08 PM, "rajini maski" wrote:
> The patch solr 2242 for getting count of distinct facet terms doesn't
>work for distributedProce
51 matches
Mail list logo
