Hi Gary,
I tried the patch on the the 3.1 source code (@
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_1/)
as well and it worked fine.
@Patch - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2416, which deals
with the Solr Cell module.
You may want to verify the contents from the
So what was my mistake? I still have not resolved this issue.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
>
>> (11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Based on adv
: But in my JAVA logs, i simply get this snippet:
: ### 13 05/19 17:27:52:333 ### Runner@9be1041:: (SOLR failed with
: SolrException for DocId = [2dac611a5bb7ce87831dc0245ffcb66a] and detailed
: Exception: [org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Internal Server Error
Unfortunately detailed err
On my Solr 1.4.1 master I am doing commits regularly at a fixed interval. I
noticed that from time to time commit will take longer than the commit
interval, causing commits to overlap. Then things will get worse as commit
will take longer and longer. Here is the logs for a long commit:
[2011-0
Bill (et al.) :
The issue I'm running into (apologies for explaining it poorly previously)
is how to reference the query term in the definition of "bf" in solrconfig.
e.g. I can statically define the search term (in this case "love") in
solrconfig.xml, and results are as I desire:
dismax
c
Hello,
I have been trying to return highlighted text in original order and without
removing anything from it.
Seems that highlighter sorts my text by score and skips the sections that do
not have a score.
I am sure I am missing something simple.
Has anyone had a similar issue?
I have tried diffe
Thank you for your replies guys.
Personally I like the flatten="true" option.
However there is still one issue with it. After stripping the tags away,
I get "JoeSmith" instead of "Joe Smith" with a space (solr 3.1).
Did anyone run into this issue?
Cheers,
Alexei
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : It is fairly simple to generate facets for ranges or 'buckets' of
> : distance in Solr:
> : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#How_to_facet_by_distance.
> : What isnt described is how to generate the links for these facets
>
> an
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
> That worked. Thanks :-)
Great! :)
--
Regards
Tor Henning Ueland
That worked. Thanks :-)
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Tor Henning Ueland
wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon
> wrote:
> > What this returns me is a set of results which has both the keywords
> > in fKeyword. Instead I need all the records that has at least one of th
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
> What this returns me is a set of results which has both the keywords
> in fKeyword. Instead I need all the records that has at least one of them as
> a keyword.
I have not tested this, but fq should as far as i know behave just as
the
Ahh yes, thanks for the suggestions! I've implemented them.
I thought about you're second point previously and had encountered that
issue. Once it's tokenized, I don't believe there is a way to get the full
string back from the token stream.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
This may or may not help you, we solved something similar based on
hyphenated words - essentially when we encountered a hyphenated word
(say word1-word2) we send in a OR query with the word (word1-word2)
itself, a phrase "word1 word2"~3 and the word formed by removing the
hyphen (word1word2).
But
Cool! suggestion: you might want to replace
externalVal.toLowerCase().split(" ");
with
externalVal.toLowerCase().split("\\s+");
also I bet folks might have different ideas about what to do with
hyphens, so maybe:
externalVal.toLowerCase().split("[-\\s]+");
In fact why not make it a config
I added these statement to schema.xml, however the full import is still not
indexing the rows.
Any ideas?
Thx u very much.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Help-Data-Import-not-indexing-in-solr-tp2963450p2966498.html
Sent fro
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, fredylee
wrote:
[...]
> The documentations for SOLR however mentions nothing about declaring fields
> in the schema.xml in order for data import to work. I must have missed it.
>
> So All I need to do is declaring field name? like the one I do below?
> default
Hi All,
I'm running the following query.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=green&version=2.2&indent=on&qt=dismax&;
fq=fKeyword:"NITROGEN"&fq=fKeyword:"corn"
&facet=on&facet.mincount=1&facet.field=fKeyword
What this returns me is a set of results which has both the keywords
in fKeyword. Instea
Have you tried url-encoding?
http://localhost:8180/solr/test-public/select/?q=test-id:1&sort=test%2Did+asc
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 19. mai 2011, at 10.50, Marc SCHNEIDER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a field called test-id but I can't use it when
Hi Gora,
Thanks for the reply. That was really fast.
Yes, the Northwind DB is a sample test DB, and I have been using that DB for
testing quite extensively. The fields exist, and select statements had been
verified. :)
The documentations for SOLR however mentions nothing about declaring fiel
Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Based on advice I received on a previous email thread, I applied patch
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2338. My goal was to be
Hello again. Unfortunately, I'm still getting nowhere with this. I
have checked-out the 3.1 source and applied Jayendra's patches (see
below) and it still appears that the contents of the files in the
zipfile are not being indexed, only the filenames of those contained files.
I'm using a sim
At my company. I've been spending some time figuring out the best approach
for inline prefix Auto completion. Most of the support for auto completion
is based solely on prefix matching, as it can jump to a certain term within
a field quickly and break the enumeration loop when the prefix no longer
Thanks y'all. Approximate poll summary, including those that voted multiple
choice:
[3] I always use the JDK logging as bundled in solr.war, that's perfect
[6] I sometimes use log4j or another framework and am happy with re-packaging
solr.war
[5] Give me solr.war WITHOUT an slf4j logger bindi
Thanks for the help so far,
I don't think this solves the problem. What if my data look like this:
soccer club Manchester united
if i search for "soccerclub manchester" and for "soccer club manchester" i
want this result back.
A copyfield that removes whitespaces is not an option.
With the cha
Or, if you want results from both together, you can use the distributed
search [1].
Just decide which one of the cores will be the "collector" and add the
shards=localhost:8983/solr/fund_dih,localhost:8983/solr/fund_tika parameter
like :
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer("
http://local
Hello,
Thanks, i think both are good options. I prefer the option with the filter.
What does
a charfilter look like?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Results-with-and-without-whitespace-soccer-club-and-soccerclub-tp2934742p2964950.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Each core need to be queried separately,
http://localhost:8983/solr/fund_dih/select?q=
http://localhost:8983/solr/fund_tika/select?q=
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Zhao, Zane [mailto:zane.z...@fil.com]
Sent: 20 May 2011 07:50
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How can I
Hello.
Also you can index only "soccerclub" always deleting the whitespace in the
expression with a charFilter. This behaviour must be also applied in search
context. So then you have:
1. Index time: soccer club --> soccerclub indexed.
2. Search time: soccer club OR soccerclub --> soccerclub sear
Hi Antonio,
Sorry, I really want to help you but I'm not understanding your point,
what query did you do? can you please add more details, or if I lost
some details can you point me to this?
Thanks, Quirino
On 20/05/11 01:35, antonio wrote:
Excuse me, i wrong to write 197085, correct is 170
He
I had the same problem. It's fix now. But it comes with a new issue:
I get results for all company's in London. Now i want the following facets:
10km(20)
20km(34)
40km(55)
40km can be outside of London. There are only company's in london in my
results.
The company's outside of London are not
30 matches
Mail list logo
