thanks Markus and Otis!
This link was helpful:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#Optimization_Considerations
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> The only thing you'd periodically do is optimizing the existing index.
>
> > Hi Satish,
> >
> > I can't think of a
The only thing you'd periodically do is optimizing the existing index.
> Hi Satish,
>
> I can't think of any benefits you'd reap by complete/full reindexing into a
> new index. Incremental indexing will be faster.
>
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
>
Hi Satish,
I can't think of any benefits you'd reap by complete/full reindexing into a new
index. Incremental indexing will be faster.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From:
Hi,
Currently we index new/updated records every 30 minutes (I am referring to
this as incremental/partial index) -- i.e., records will be added to an
existing index. Are there any benefits in creating a new index (i.e., delete
the existing index and create it) from a performance point of view eve
Hi Jeff,
In that case, you can create a new index field (set indexed to true and
stored to false) and copy all your fields to it using copyField.
Also make this new field as your default search field.
This will handle your case.
Regards,
Anuj
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Saler, Jeff wrote
copyField should do the trick:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields
"A common requirement is to copy or merge all input fields into a
single solr field. This can be done as follows:-
"
hth,
rob
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Saler, Jeff wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
Thanks for the reply. What I want is for the query to search all fields
for the specified value.
-Original Message-
From: Anuj Kumar [mailto:anujs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 1:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: querying in Java
Hi Jeff,
In that case, it
Hi Jeff,
In that case, it will query w.r.t default field. What is your default search
field in the schema?
Regards,
Anuj
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Saler, Jeff wrote:
> Is there any way to query for data that is in any field, i.e. not using
> a specific field name?
>
>
>
> For example,
Is there any way to query for data that is in any field, i.e. not using
a specific field name?
For example, when I use the following statements:
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
Query.setQuery("ANALYST:John Schummers");
QueryResponse rsp = server
solr-1.4 version does not support terms.regex .So you need to upgrade your
version to solr-3.1.
-Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in --
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-terms-middle-of-words-tp2878694p2880040.html
Sent from the Solr - User mail
it seems jar files related to DataImport Handler are not being loaded in
memory.Try to copy Data Import Handler related jars to solr_home/lib
directory and restart the servlet container.
-Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in --
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co
Just to add more info... this is the result of a Replication / Command=Details
I'm really confused by the masterDetails/indexSize being 52 byts (its
correct), but the indexSize being 303.8 KB
-
-
0
15
-
303.8 KB
D:\Solr\data\solr\index
false
true
1301331343628
3
-
-
Hello, i'm having some issues with replication in my production environment.
I have a master and 4 slaves.
I had some data indexed and was replicated successfully.
We are close to make the production environment public, so i deleted
the old data deleting the data folder in the master
Then i reloa
hi
I tried before both %20 and " " terms it didn`t work. Also regex=(.*)(book)
delete spaces and merge results like
thebook
asbook
atbook
songbook
yearbook--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-terms-middle-of-words-tp2878694p2879375.html
Sent from
@roySolr : terms.regex exits from Solr 3.1. Doesn't seem compatible.
@ramires : Did you try with space in your regex. Something like
terms.regex=(.*) book (.*) <-- I put space before and after book. If it
doesn't work, try to replace space with %20. I didn't try so I don't know if
it work.
2011/4
Good question, you could be correct about that. It's possible that
part hasn't been built yet? If not then you could create a patch?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Andy wrote:
>
> --- On Fri, 4/29/11, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>
>> It's answered on the wiki site:
>>
>> "TSTLookup - ternary tr
hi
I have question about regex terms. I try to find terms before and after
word'ing but can't sand blank char. how can I send through ??
terms?terms=true&terms.fl=content&terms.regex=(.*)(
book)&terms.regex.flag=case_insensitive&terms.limit=50--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
I'd guess that what's happening is that you're pegging the CPU with 4
threads, serving up the absolute maximum that the machine will
handle. The thing to look at is the throughput rather than avg
response time (although that's going down but not as rapidly, which
is still a bit puzzling).
Usually,
I'm a little confused about your use of the word "reload", see below.
But if this doesn't clarify things, or your experiments give strange
results, could
you please start posting sample configurations so we can be sure we're talking
about the same thing?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:15 A
terms.regex doesn´t work for me. Prefix works fine. I use SOLR 1.4.. Is it
compatible?--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-terms-middle-of-words-tp2878694p2878948.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The words are now splitted in the index(nGram). It looks like this:
m
ma
man
manc
manch
manche
manches
manchest
mancheste
manchester
The termsComponent does not see it as one word(manchester). It gives me the
results back in NGrams(m,ma,man etc)--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.
You can do it without NGram with a query like this :
http://localhost:8983/solr/terms?terms=true&terms.fl=suggestionField&terms.regex=(.*)chest(.*)&terms.regex.flag=case_insensitive
In my case, I had to encode (.*) so replace it with %28.*%29 if needed.
It use a regex. I don't know if it has an im
Hello ,
If you are using NGram then do not use TermsComponent, Query normally like
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=suggestionField:chest
It will give you the desired suggestions
-Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in --
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Au
you could use EdgeNGramFilterFactory :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
And you should mix front and back ngram process in your analyzer :
is it better ?
Ludovic.
-Jouve
France.--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n
Ok, i try NGrams. My configuration looks like this:
i try to run the query:
http:/
That's true. But the degradation is so big. If you use lunch concurrent
requests to a web app taht doesn't use Solr the time per request won't
degradate that much. For me, it looks more like a synchronized is happening
somewhere in Solr or Lucene and is causing this.--
View this message in context:
You have 4 core machine that can execute 4 threads parallel. After 4 threads
it will start context switching between threads.
-Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in --
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Strange-performance-behaviour-when-concurrent-requests-are
Any suggestion about this issue?--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Strange-performance-behaviour-when-concurrent-requests-are-done-tp505478p2878758.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
NGram will work for you if you want to search in middle of the word .You can
also look for wildcard search for that.
NGram will increase the size of index while wildcard queries are slow.
-Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in --
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
Hello,
I use the termsComponent to fix some autocomplete on my website. I use the
prefix and get the following results:
searching for manch:
manchester city(10)
manchester united(2)
When a user search for ches i want the following results:
chesterfield united(13)
manchester united(2)
I want t
I understand that multicores allows met o create two cores which are just
normal solr-homes. That's easy.
However I'm only interested to the reload command and, in particular, to reload
the underlying index segment files.
Do I understand correctly that the following is what I should do?
- still
I did the String Solution, works great, thank you!
Am 29.04.2011 um 00:25 schrieb Jan Høydahl:
> 1) Create an extra String field on your bean as Yonik suggests or
> 2) Write an UpdateRequestHandler which reads the doubles and creates the
> LatLon from that
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution
Geeta,
have a look on the the following wiki pages:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrLogging
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LoggingInDefaultJettySetup
Regards
Stefan
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Grijesh wrote:
> You can see solr logs at your servlet container's log file i.e. if you are
> using
33 matches
Mail list logo
