Why not count them on the way in and just store that number along
with the original e-mail?
Best
Erick
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Kaushik Chakraborty wrote:
> Ok. My expectation was since "comment_post_id" is a MultiValued field hence
> it would appear multiple times (i.e. for each comment
Wouldn't you want to extract your original data format from the index and then
'count' the comments for each post ?
I don't think facets are appropriate.
On Apr 3, 2011, at 22:10, Kaushik Chakraborty wrote:
> Ok. My expectation was since "comment_post_id" is a MultiValued field hence
> it wou
Ok. My expectation was since "comment_post_id" is a MultiValued field hence
it would appear multiple times (i.e. for each comment). And hence when I
would facet with that field it would also give me the count of those many
documents where comment_post_id appears.
My requirement is getting total fo
Short form:
I think you're going down a rabbit-hole and should just
use synonyms and forget about it.
I'm particularly thinking that a general-purpose solution
that somehow breaks up or combines adjacent tokens
will have consequences that pop out other places that
you don't want and you'll have to
It's not a specific case only ( e.g. microsoft.com), but it's really a
multi word issue.
carwash, bookkeeper etc...
I'm ultimately looking for a schema for search and retrieve that's heavily
focused on 'names'.. these are peoples names, business names etc.. not
content like large text fields,
Jeffery:
It's perfectly appropriate to raise a JIRA for something like this.
If you could add the steps to make this happen, that'd be great.
see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Contributing_your_work.
If you can add a patch, that'd be even better (instructions on that page
too). Y
OK, you're still not quite on the right track. You can't just
index XML documents without transforming them into
valid Solr XML documents. Ditto for HTML.
Take a look at the ExtractingRequestHandler documentation at:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
Here's some more documentat
Hmmm, I think you're misunderstanding faceting. It's counting the
number of documents that have a particular value. So if you're
faceting on "comment_post_id", there is one and only one document
with that value (assuming that the comment_post_ids are unique).
Which is what's being reported This
Is this a general question or specific? You can handle specific ones by
using synonyms.
But the general case, that is treating any two pairs of tokens as
a single pair seems fraught with unintended consequences, but
you know your problem space better than I do.
Best
Erick
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at
Hi Erick,
thanx for getting back to me.
"Well, what is "a document on the filesystem"? Solr deals
with well-formed XML documents of a specific format."
I would like to index all kinds of documents. For a start I'll be happy to
be able to work with xml and html documents.
--
View this message in
Well, what is "a document on the filesystem"? Solr deals
with well-formed XML documents of a specific format. You
can't just stream a random file to Solr. Specifically
documents look like:
value for field
.
.
.
perhaps with an .
There are ways for structured documents to be added using the
T
Hi,
My index contains a root entity "Post" and a child entity "Comments". Each
post can have multiple comments. data-config.xml:
On Apr 3, 2011, at 6:56am, yehosef wrote:
> How can they require payment for something that was developed under the
> apache license?
It's the difference between free speech and free beer :)
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
+1
Take "Lucidworks for Solr", it's free.
Regards, Wolfram
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yehosef [mailto:yeho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2011 15:57
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Difference between Solr and Lucidworks distribution
How can they require payment
I'm doing some performance benchmarking of Solr and I started with a single big
JSON file containing all the docs that I'm sending via curl. The results are
fantastic - I'm achieving an indexing rate of about 44,000 docs/sec using this
method (these are really small test docs). In the past I hav
How can they require payment for something that was developed under the
apache license?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Difference-between-Solr-and-Lucidworks-distribution-tp2474792p2771191.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I managed to find both documents with your two input queries .
Add this filter in your analyzer query part :
=>
The main problem is that your query "microsoft" is transfor
17 matches
Mail list logo
