Re: Embedded Solr

Greg, I guess the question is related to the app-store's ban of java. If you follow the java-...@lists.apple.com mailing list you'll see that a full JVM is a problem but that skimmed, self-installed JVMs have been ok at least once. SOLR is under the family of things that do not need a gui so you

RE: Problems with creating a query that matches all the documents I want to display

If the "OR" actually worked to do what it's trying to say, would it be what you wanted? Because I can't believe I didn't recognize this is an instance of the very thing I posted on this list this morning, where the solr-lucene query parser has problems with some kinds of 'pure negative' queries

Re: Problems with creating a query that matches all the documents I want to display

How about using below as a &q= parameter? With &df=OR +openingtime:[* TO NOW] +closingtime[NOW TO *] (+*:* -openingtime[* TO *] -closingtime[* TO *]) http://search-lucene.com/m/TN2a3WgvyX/ --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Jan-Eirik B. Nævdal wrote: > From: Jan-Eirik B. Nævdal > Subject: Re: Problems

Re: Embedded Solr

Yes it needs java to run Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 21, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Greg Georges wrote: > Hello all, > > I am using Solr in a Java architecture right now, and the results are great. > The app development team has asked me if it is possible to embed Solr, but > the request is to

Re: Problems with creating a query that matches all the documents I want to display

Hi, In a _high load_ environment with queryResultCache and filterCache enabled, you need to be very careful about using NOW in its highest precision. It adds - and likely evicts - a non retrievable entry in both caches, wasting a lot of resources. It's best to always reduce precision when you

Re: working with collection : Where is default schema.xml

Ok thank. It is my fault. I have created collection with a lucidimagination perl script. I will errase the schema.xml. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/working-with-collection-Where-is-default-schema-xml-tp2700455p2712496.html Sent from the Solr - Us

Re: Problems with creating a query that matches all the documents I want to display

Unfortunalty have I tried the OR approach in the fq. with the positive filter query first i get document 4, with negative filter query first i get none result, This request gives me 1 reply http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&version=2.2&start=0&rows=100&indent=on]&fq=obj_todate_dt%3A[*%20TO

Re: debugQuery doesnot work with Solr-1.3.0 , is it true?

--- On Mon, 3/21/11, Anurag wrote: > From: Anurag > Subject: debugQuery doesnot work with Solr-1.3.0 , is it true? > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Monday, March 21, 2011, 11:18 PM > i am trying to put this query on > Solr-1.3.0 server which is integrated with > Nutch-1.0. > http://loc

Re: Problems with creating a query that matches all the documents I want to display

You can put an actual OR in the fq (an fq, by default, is in the solr-lucene query parser language). Might that achieve what you want? &fq= -openingtime:[* TO *] OR openingtime:[* TO NOW] &fq= -closingtime:[* TO *] OR closingtime:[NOW TO *] Does that, or some variation of it, do what you need

Problems with creating a query that matches all the documents I want to display

Hi Have this problem I tried to solve with filter queries but I think I`m stuck now, and don't see a solution how to solve my problem. My problem is that i want a result page that shows those documents that matches these filter query fq=openingtime:[* TO NOW] , fq=closingtime[NOW TO *] for the doc

debugQuery doesnot work with Solr-1.3.0 , is it true?

i am trying to put this query on Solr-1.3.0 server which is integrated with Nutch-1.0. http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=solr&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&debugQuery=on But the results, i am getting doesnot have explaination for the score as it should include tf, idf etc Shoul

RE: Implementing Facets

> Yes this is the case. I have changed it to reflect your > suggestion thank you for this. > > After reloading the app I still get the error, here is the > full stack trace from catalina.out It seems you have one more typo: 50 => 50

Re: sending a parsed query to solr (xml-query-parser, syntaxtree)

On Mar 21, 2011, at 14:19 , karsten-s...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a migration from verity k2 to solr. > > At this point I have a parser for the Verity Query Language (our used subset) > which generates a syntax tree. > I transfer this in a couple of filters and one query. Thi

RE: Implementing Facets

Hi Ahmet, Yes this is the case. I have changed it to reflect your suggestion thank you for this. After reloading the app I still get the error, here is the full stack trace from catalina.out INFO: [] Registered new searcher Searcher@8af0b0 main 21-Mar-2011 20:28:53 org.apache.solr.common.SolrE

Embedded Solr

Hello all, I am using Solr in a Java architecture right now, and the results are great. The app development team has asked me if it is possible to embed Solr, but the request is to embed it into a C++ app and mac app using objective C. I do not have much knowledge on embedded Solr. Does it need

Re: Implementing Facets

--- On Mon, 3/21/11, McGibbney, Lewis John wrote: > From: McGibbney, Lewis John > Subject: Implementing Facets > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" > Date: Monday, March 21, 2011, 9:50 PM > Hi list, > > I am working with a Ajax-Solr GUI but I am getting the > following error from Firebug when

email - DIH

Hi, I’m using Data Import Handler for index emails. The problem is that nota ll the emails was indexed When I do a full import. Someone have any idea? Regards, -- Matias.

Implementing Facets

Hi list, I am working with a Ajax-Solr GUI but I am getting the following error from Firebug when launching the web app on Tomcat 7.0.11. The web app uses Solr version 1.4.1 >HTTP Status 400 - undefined field linksnoshade="noshade">type Status reportmessage >undefined field linksdescription Th

Re: How to upgrade to Solr4.0 to use Result Grouping?

Is it the file apache-solr-4.0-2011-03-18_08-07-35-src.tgz on page https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/? Thanks Ri

Re: How to upgrade to Solr4.0 to use Result Grouping?

Thanks. Then where is the link to download the latest 4.0? Richard On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Erick Erickson > wrote: > > Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk > > version either through SVN or from the nightly build > >

Re: Solr 1.4.1 missing CSV queryResponseWriter?

CSV response format is only available in 3.1 (soon to be released) and later. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CSVResponseWriter -Yonik http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May 25-26, San Francisco On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:02 PM, danomano wrote: > Hi folks, I was running

Solr 1.4.1 missing CSV queryResponseWriter?

Hi folks, I was running 1.4.0, but today I'm trying to switch to 1.4.1 (which appears to work with Zoie), however when I try to retrieve data in CSV format, wt=csv does not appear to work anymore. Looking at the solrconfig.xml I see: (I tried pulling out the CSV entry, but that failed (class not f

Re: How to upgrade to Solr4.0 to use Result Grouping?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk > version either through SVN or from the nightly build > at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/S-Z/view/Solr/ > > Note that 3.1 also has result grouping Result grouping / field collapsin

Re: How to upgrade to Solr4.0 to use Result Grouping?

Hi Erick Thanks for your reply. 3.1 should be OK for me. When will it be release and where is the link to download it? Thanks Richard On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk > version either through SVN or from the nightly buil

sending a parsed query to solr (xml-query-parser, syntaxtree)

Hi, I am working on a migration from verity k2 to solr. At this point I have a parser for the Verity Query Language (our used subset) which generates a syntax tree. I transfer this in a couple of filters and one query. This fragmentation is the reason, why I can not use my parser inside solr

Re: DIH Issue(newbie to solr)

Thanks Gora it works..!!! Thanks again. One last question, the documents get indexed well and all but when I issue full-import command it still says Total Requests made to DataSource 0 Would you know why this could happen. Neha -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co

Re: DIH Issue(newbie to solr)

Thanks Gora...it works.. Thanks again..:) Neha -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-Issue-newbie-to-solr-tp2695407p2710864.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: DIH Issue(newbie to solr)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, neha wrote: > Hi Gora, > The absolute path solved the issue, but in a weird situation though. Great. That should be most of your issue solved. > > The > index files are

Re: Segments and Memory Correlate?

yes we are having physical memory issues, but do does anyone know for a fact if there is direct correlation between be segment counts and RAM - memory? i.e. when the system begins a search on a segment, does it load that segments full index. Or does the system load All index data for all Segments

Re: DIH Issue(newbie to solr)

Hi Gora, The absolute path solved the issue, but in a weird situation though. The index files are being written to /example/solr/data/index instead of .example/test/solr/data/index. I run start jetty with ./test/solr/ as home would you know why this is happening. PS: While starting with c

Re: more beware on 1.4.1 lucene QP "NOT"

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > So Solr 1.4.1, lucene query parser, generally has no problem with a query > that's simply one clause "NOT"" > > &defType=lucene > &q=NOT foo > > No problem! Also no problem: > > &q=foo AND NOT bar > > But, problem when the operand to an "

more beware on 1.4.1 lucene QP "NOT"

So Solr 1.4.1, lucene query parser, generally has no problem with a query that's simply one clause "NOT"" &defType=lucene &q=NOT foo No problem! Also no problem: &q=foo AND NOT bar But, problem when the operand to an "OR" is a NOT: &q=foo OR (NOT bar) Does NOT work correctly. Can be worked

Re: keeping data consistent between Database and Solr

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 3/15/2011 12:54 PM, onlinespend...@gmail.com wrote: > >> That's pretty interesting to use the autoincrementing document ID as a way >> to keep track of what has not been indexed in Solr. And you overwrite >> this >> document ID even when

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Marc SCHNEIDER wrote: > Hi Erick, > > Thanks for your answer. > I'm a quite newbie to Solr so I'm a little bit confused. > Do you mean that (using Solrj in my case) I should add all fields (stored > and not stored) before adding the document to the index? [...] No

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

Hi Erick, Thanks for your answer. I'm a quite newbie to Solr so I'm a little bit confused. Do you mean that (using Solrj in my case) I should add all fields (stored and not stored) before adding the document to the index? Thanks, Marc. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Th

Re: keeping data consistent between Database and Solr

On 3/15/2011 12:54 PM, onlinespend...@gmail.com wrote: That's pretty interesting to use the autoincrementing document ID as a way to keep track of what has not been indexed in Solr. And you overwrite this document ID even when you modify an existing document. Very cool. I suppose the number ca

RE: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

I answered myself a similar question here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4037625/change-schema-in-solr-without-reindex I Hope it helps De: Marc SCHNEIDER [marc.schneide...@gmail.com] Enviado el: lunes, 21 de marzo de 2011 15:20 Para: solr-user@lucene

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

The problem is that unless you *stored* every field in the Solr index, getting the document back will not have all the original information. Getting a Solr document only returns the stored fields. And updating is really a delete followed by an add. So let's say you have field A that hasn't been st

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

Hi Ahmet, That did it, thanks a lot! Marc. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > Is there a fastest way to do that? I mean transforming a > > SolrDocument into a > > SolrInputDocument? > > Does these static methods help? > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toS

Re: Memory leak for Multiple fields faceted searching

Memory consumption grows as the number of unique terms grows. So in addition to Darx's question, how many unique terms are in all the fields you're faceting on? Best Erick 2011/3/21 newsam : > Hi, > > Here is my environment: 32bits windows server 2008 (4cpu and 12G RAM), > 320million docs, index

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

Hi Péter, I'm not sure to understand your answer. A SolrInputDocument always contains only stored fields, so I don't see the problem. I just like to update an existing stored field... Thanks, Marc. 2011/3/21 Péter Király > Hi Marc, > > as far as I know the best way to do it is working from the

Re: How to upgrade to Solr4.0 to use Result Grouping?

Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk version either through SVN or from the nightly build at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/S-Z/view/Solr/ Note that 3.1 also has result grouping, and is currently being released, so you might want to consider that version. Best Erick On Sun, M

Re: working with collection : Where is default schema.xml

More details please? Solr doesn't generate any schemas, so I'm completely lost what you're after here. Best Erick On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:59 PM, geag34 wrote: > Hello. > > I am working with collection. > When I do a new collection I would like a custom schema.xml to be generated. > And not the

Re: Logic operator with dismax

Dismax does not support boolean queries, you may try using Extended Dismax for the boolean support. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553 Regards, Jayendra On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote: > Hello, > > The Dismax search handler doesn't have the concept of

Re: Adding the suggest component

OK, I think you're jumping ahead and trying to do too many things at once. What did you download? Source? The distro? The error you posted usually happens for me when I haven't compiled the "example" target from source. So I'd guess you don't have the proper targets built. This assumes you downloa

Re: Memory leak for Multiple fields faceted searching

How much memory you specify for java heap? -Xmx...

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

> Is there a fastest way to do that? I mean transforming a > SolrDocument into a > SolrInputDocument? Does these static methods help? org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toSolrDocument() org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toSolrInputDocument()

Re: Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

Hi Marc, as far as I know the best way to do it is working from the original source, because it is possible, that not all fields are stores, and the original content of the not stored fields is not inside the Solr document. Péter 2011/3/21 Marc SCHNEIDER : > Hello, > > I'd like to know the faste

Transform a SolrDocument into a SolrInputDocument

Hello, I'd like to know the fastest way (code lines) to update a field of a document. So my idea was: 1) Get a SolrDocument 2) Add all fields of the SolrDocument to a new SolrInputDocument 3) Update the field in SolrInputDocument 4) Add SolrInputDocument to the server and commit it Is there a fas

Spellchecking Escaped Queries

I'm having an issue performing a spellcheck on some information and search of the archive isn't helping. I'm indexing the word "p!nk" (yes, that's a bang in there), and have a replacement filter setup so that the ! becomes i. Looking at the analyzer the right thing is happening with both the inde

Re: frequent index updates

Hello, This thread might help: http://search-lucene.com/m/09PHV1E0ZxQ1/Possibilities+of+near+real+time+search+with+solr/v=threaded On 21 March 2011 09:33, Prav Buz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering what are the best way to do this for this scenario: > > Index will have about 250 - 400 million item

Re: Logic operator with dismax

Hello, The Dismax search handler doesn't have the concept of a logical operator in terms of OR-AND but rather uses a feature called Min-Should-Match (or mm). This parameter specifies the absolute number or percentage of the entered terms that you need them to match. To have an OR-like effect you c

Logic operator with dismax

Hi. i have a problem with logic operator OR in dismax query search. some days ago the query worked well. now it returns me anything (0 documents) i explain: the query is: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q= "1324"OR"4322"OR"2324"OR%20hello+world&defType=dismax&qf=code%20title the schema has th

Memory leak for Multiple fields faceted searching

Hi, Here is my environment: 32bits windows server 2008 (4cpu and 12G RAM), 320million docs, index size 12G. When we use query=*:* and 10 fields for faceted searching, it works. However, 15 feilds or more faceted searching caused the following exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap sp

frequent index updates

Hi, I'm wondering what are the best way to do this for this scenario: Index will have about 250 - 400 million items. Index needs to be updated every 10/20 minutes and no. of records updated could be upto 5-6 million in each. Could you please guide me on how the indexing is done when there are ab