Re: Solr Cell: Content extraction problem with ContentStreamUpdateRequest and multiple files

In case the exact problem was not clear to somebody: The problem with FileUpload interpreting file data as regular form fields is that, Solr thinks there are no content streams in the request and throws a "missing_content_stream" exception. On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Karthik Shiraly < karth

Re: NRT in Solr

Please start new threads for new conversations. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:27 AM, stockii wrote: > question: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearchTuning > > > 'PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=x > > i got this message. > in my solrconfig.xml: maxWarmingSearchers=4, if i set

Solr Cell: Content extraction problem with ContentStreamUpdateRequest and multiple files

Hi, I'm using Solr 1.4.1. The scenario involves user uploading multiple files. These have content extracted using SolrCell, then indexed by Solr along with other information about the user. ContentStreamUpdateRequest seemed like the right choice for this - use addFile() to send file data, and use

Re: docBoost

Yes just add if statement based on a field type and do a row.put() only if that other value is a certain value. On 3/9/11 1:39 PM, "Brian Lamb" wrote: >That makes sense. As a follow up, is there a way to only conditionally use >the boost score? For example, in some cases I want to use the boos

Re: NRT in Solr

So it looks like can handle adding new documents, and expiring old documents. Updating a document is not part of the game. This would work well for message boards or tweet type solutions. Solr can do this as well directly. Why wouldn't you just improve the document and facet caching so that when y

Re: java.lang.ClassCastException being thrown seemingly at random

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:34 PM, harish.agarwal wrote: > I'm using a recent build of the trunk (from 3/1).  I've noticed that after > the index is up and running for some time I start to get intermittent errors > that look like this: > > Mar 2, 2011 9:26:01 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException l

Caching filter question / code review

I created the following SearchComponent that wraps a deduplicate filter around the current query and added it to last-components. It appears to be working, but is there any way I can improve the performance? Would this be considered and added to the filtercache? Am I even caching correctly? T

java.lang.ClassCastException being thrown seemingly at random

Hello, I'm using a recent build of the trunk (from 3/1). I've noticed that after the index is up and running for some time I start to get intermittent errors that look like this: Mar 2, 2011 9:26:01 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: java.lang.ClassCastException The query

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Yeah sure. Let me update this on the Solandra wiki. I'll send across the link I think you hit the main two shortcomings atm. -Jake On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Jake, > > Maybe it's time to come up with the Solandra/Solr matrix so we can see > Solandra's strengths

Re: some relational-type groupig with search

It is not just one document that would be returned, it one document per person.  That is a little trickier. - Original Message - From: "Michael Sokolov" To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: "l blevins" Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2011 7:46:10 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: some relational-t

Re: Fwd: some relational-type groupig with search

Probably you can just sort by date (one way and then the other) and limit your result set to a single document. That should free up enough budget for the bonuses of the highly-placed people, I think :) On 3/9/2011 4:05 PM, l.blev...@comcast.net wrote: - Forwarded Message - From: "l bl

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Jake, Maybe it's time to come up with the Solandra/Solr matrix so we can see Solandra's strengths (e.g. RT, no replication) and weaknesses (e.g. I think I saw a mention of some big indices?) or missing feature (e.g. no delete by query), etc. Thanks! Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :

Re: NRT in Solr

Jonathan, they have a Wiki up these somewhere, including pretty diagrams. If you have Lucene in Action, Zoie is one of the case studies and is described in a lot of detail. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Jason, It's predecessor did, Lucandra. But Solandra is a new approach that manages shards of documents across the cluster for you and uses solrs distributed search to query indexes. Jake On Mar 9, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Doesn't Solandra partition by term instead of docu

Re: NRT in Solr

Interesting, does anyone have a summary of what techniques zoie uses to do this? I don't see any docs on the technical details. On 3/9/2011 5:29 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote: Zoie adds NRT to Solr: http://snaprojects.jira.com/wiki/display/ZOIE/Zoie+Solr+Plugin I haven't tried it yet but looks c

Re: NRT in Solr

Zoie adds NRT to Solr: http://snaprojects.jira.com/wiki/display/ZOIE/Zoie+Solr+Plugin I haven't tried it yet but looks cool. ~ David Smiley Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/ On Mar 9, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Jae, > > NRT hasn't been implemen

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

Wait, if you don't have identical indexes, then why would you expect identical results? If your indexes are different, one would expect the results for the same query to be different -- there are different documents in the index! The iDF portion of the TF/iDF type algorithm at the base of So

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Doesn't Solandra partition by term instead of document? On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote: > I was just about to jump in this conversation to mention Solandra and go fig, > Solandra's committer comes in. :-)   It was nice to meet you at Strata, Jake. > > I haven't dug into t

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

I was just about to jump in this conversation to mention Solandra and go fig, Solandra's committer comes in. :-) It was nice to meet you at Strata, Jake. I haven't dug into the code yet but Solandra strikes me as a killer way to scale Solr. I'm looking forward to playing with it; particularly

Math-generated fields during query

Hi, I was wondering if it is possible during a query to create a returned field 'on the fly' (like function query, but for concrete values, not score). For example, if I input this query: q=_val_:"product(15,3)"&fl=*,score For every returned document, I get score = 45. If I change it slightl

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

Oh wow, how did I miss that? My apologies to anyone who read this post. I should have diffed my custom dismax handler. Looks like my SVN merge didn't work properly. Embarassing. Thanks everyone ;) On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jayendra Patil

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jayendra Patil wrote: > Are you sure you have the same config ... > The boost seems different for the field text - text:dubai^0.1 & text:dubai Yep... Try adding echoParams=all and see all the parameters solr is acting on. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreQueryParame

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

Are you sure you have the same config ... The boost seems different for the field text - text:dubai^0.1 & text:dubai -2.286596 = (MATCH) sum of: - 1.6891675 = (MATCH) sum of: -1.3198489 = (MATCH) max plus 0.01 times others of: - 0.023022119 = (MATCH) weight(text:dubai^0.1 in 1551), produ

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

That's what I think, glad I am not going mad. I've spent 1/2 a day comparing the config files, checking out from SVN again and ensuring the databases are identical. I cannot see what else I can do to make them equivalent. Both servers checkout directly from SVN, I am convinced the files are the

Indexing a text string for faceting

Hello all, I have a small problem with my faceting fields. In all I create a new faceting field which is indexed and not stored, and use copyField. The problem is I facet on category names which have examples like this Policies & Documentation (37)

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

Thanks. Good to know, but even so my problem remains - the end score should not be different and is causing a dramatically different ranking of a document (3 versus 7 is dramatic for my client). This must be down to the scoring debug differences - it's the only difference I can find :( On Mar 9

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

Yes, but the identical index with the identical solrconfig.xml and the identical query and the identical version of Solr on two different machines should preduce identical results. So it's a legitimate question why it's not. But perhaps queryNorm isn't enough to answer that. Sorry, it's out o

Re: Excluding results from more like this

Yeah, that just restricts what items are in your main result set (and adding -4 has no real effect). The more like this set is constructed based on your main result set, for each document in it. As far as I can see from here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis ..there seems to be no bu

Re: Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

queryNorm is just a normalizing factor and is the same value across all the results for a query, to just make the scores comparable. So even if it varies in different environment, you should not worried about. http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html#formula

Re: Excluding results from more like this

That doesn't seem to do it. Record 4 is still showing up in the MoreLikeThis results. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Brian, > > ...?q=id:(2 3 5) -4 > > > Otis > --- > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-

FunctionQueries and FieldCache and OOM

Hi, In one of the environments i'm working on (4 Solr 1.4.1. nodes with replication, 3+ million docs, ~5.5GB index size, high commit rate (~1-2min), high query rate (~50q/s), high number of updates (~1000docs/commit)) the nodes continuously run out of memory. During development we frequently r

Same index is ranking differently on 2 machines

Hi, I am seeing an issue I do not understand and hope that someone can shed some light on this. The issue is that for a particular search we are seeing a particular result rank in position 3 on one machine and position 8 on the production machine. The position 3 is our desired and roughly expec

Re: Excluding results from more like this

Brian, ...?q=id:(2 3 5) -4 Otis --- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message > From: Brian Lamb > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 4:05:10 PM > Subject: Excluding resu

Fwd: some relational-type groupig with search

- Forwarded Message - From: "l blevins" To: "solr user mail" Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2011 4:03:06 PM Subject: some relational-type groupig with search I have a large database for which we have some good search capabilties now, but am interested to see if SOLR might be usable

Excluding results from more like this

Hi all, I'm using MoreLikeThis to find similar results but I'd like to exclude records by the id number. For example, I use the following URL: http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=id:(2 3 5)&mlt=true&mlt.fl=description,id&fl=*,score How would I exclude record 4 form the MoreLikeThis results? I

Re: docBoost

That makes sense. As a follow up, is there a way to only conditionally use the boost score? For example, in some cases I want to use the boost score and in other cases I want all documents to be treated equally. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jayendra Patil wrote: > you can use the ScriptTransf

Re: Solr Hanging all of sudden with update/csv

You will need to cap the maximum segment size using LogByteSizeMergePolicy.setMaxMergeMB. As then you will only have segments that are of an optimal size, and Lucene will not try to create gigantic segments. I think though on the query side you will run out of heap space due to the terms index si

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Hi Otis, Have you considered using Solandra with Quorum writes to achieve master/master with CA semantics? -Jake On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > Original Message > > > From: Robert Petersen > > > > Can't you skip the SAN and keep the indexes locall

Re: Solr Hanging all of sudden with update/csv

Hi, You'll benefit from watching this segment merging video: http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/02/visualizing-lucenes-segment-merges.html And you'll appreciate the graph at the bottom: http://code.google.com/p/zoie/wiki/ZoieMergePolicy Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - L

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Hi, Original Message > From: Robert Petersen > > Can't you skip the SAN and keep the indexes locally? Then you would > have two redundant copies of the index and no lock issues. I could, but then I'd have the issue of keeping them in sync, which seems more fragile. I think SAN m

Re: docBoost

you can use the ScriptTransformer to perform the boost calcualtion and addition. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#ScriptTransformer

Re: docBoost

Anyone have any clue on this on? On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Brian Lamb wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using dataimport to create my index and I want to use docBoost to > assign some higher weights to certain docs. I understand the concept behind > docBoost but I haven't been able to find an examp

Sorting

Hi all, I know that I can add &sort=score desc to the url to sort in descending order. However, I would like to sort a MoreLikeThis response which returns records like this: I don't want them grouped by result; I would just like have them all thrown together and then sorted according to

Re: how would you design schema?

Would having a solr-document represent a 'product purchase per account' solve your problem? You could then easily link the date of purchase to the document as well as the account-number. e.g: fields: orderid (key), productid, product-characteristics, order-characteristics (including date of purcha

how would you design schema?

Hi, I'm investigating how to set up a schema like this: I want to index accounts and the products purchased (multiValued) by that account but I also need the ability to search by the date the product was purchased. It would be easy if the purchase date wasn't part of the requirements. How w

Re: Solr Hanging all of sudden with update/csv

After About 4-5 hours the merge completed (ran out of heap)..as you suggested..it was having memory issues.. Read queries during the merge were working just fine (they were taking longer then normal ~30-60seconds). I think I need to do more reading on understanding the merge/optimization processe

RE: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Can't you skip the SAN and keep the indexes locally? Then you would have two redundant copies of the index and no lock issues. Also, Can't master02 just be a slave to master01 (in the master farm and separate from the slave farm) until such time as master01 fails? Then master02 would start rec

Re: Newb query question

Hi, It sounds like if you put those 4 chars in a separate field at index time you could apply your logic on that at search time. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message > From: Daniel

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in CAP)

Hi, - Original Message > From: Walter Underwood > On Mar 9, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > You mean it's not possible to have 2 masters that are in nearly real-time >sync? > > How about with DRBD? I know people use DRBD to keep 2 Hadoop NNs (their >edit > > > l

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

On 3/9/2011 12:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: But check this! In some cases one is not allowed to save content to disk (think copyrights). I'm not making this up - we actually have a customer with this "cannot save to disk" (but can index) requirement. Do they realize that a Solr index is on

Re: Newb query question

How about something like: for exclusion +*:* -KEY:abcd* for inclusion +*:* +KEY:abcd* Best Erick On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Baughman wrote: > Is there a way to perform string logic on the key field using a subquery or > some other method. > > > > IE. If the left 4 characters of th

Newb query question

Is there a way to perform string logic on the key field using a subquery or some other method. IE. If the left 4 characters of the key are ABCD, then include or exclude those from the search. Here is the "laymans" pseudo code for what I'm wanting to do: *:* AND LEFT(KEY, 4) <> 'abcd'

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Right. LB VIP on both sides of master(s). Black box. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message > From: Robert Petersen > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 12:16

RE: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

I guess you could put a LB between slaves and masters, never thought of that! :) -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:10 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: True master-master fail-over without data ga

Re: dataimport

Brian, I had the same problem a while back and set the JAVA_OPTS env variable to something my machine could handle. That may also be an option for you going forward. Adam On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Brian Lamb wrote: > This has since been fixed. The problem was that there was not enough mem

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

This is why there's block cipher cryptography. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > On disk, yes, but only indexed, and thus far enough from the original content > to > make storing terms in Lucene's inverted index. > > Otis > > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

RAMdisk > ...but the index resides on disk doesn't it??? lol > > -Original Message- > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:06 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps > >

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

On disk, yes, but only indexed, and thus far enough from the original content to make storing terms in Lucene's inverted index. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message > From: Robert P

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Hi, - Original Message > > Currently I use an application connected to a queue containing incoming > data which my indexer app turns into solr docs. I log everything to a > log table and have never had an issue with losing anything. Yeah, if everything goes through some storage th

RE: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

...but the index resides on disk doesn't it??? lol -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:06 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps Hi, - Original Mess

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

On Mar 9, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > You mean it's not possible to have 2 masters that are in nearly real-time > sync? > How about with DRBD? I know people use DRBD to keep 2 Hadoop NNs (their edit > logs) in sync to avoid the current NN SPOF, for example, so I'm thinking this

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Hi, - Original Message > > I'd honestly think about buffer the incoming documents in some store that's >actually made for fail-over persistence reliability, maybe CouchDB or >something. >And then that's taking care of not losing anything, and the problem becomes >how >we make su

RE: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Currently I use an application connected to a queue containing incoming data which my indexer app turns into solr docs. I log everything to a log table and have never had an issue with losing anything. I can trace incoming docs exactly, and keep timing data in there also. If I added a second solr

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Hi, - Original Message > > > Oh, there is no DB involved. Think of a document stream continuously > > coming >in, > > a component listening to that stream, grabbing docs, and pushing it to > > master(s). > > I don't think Solr is designed for this use case, eg, I wouldn't > expec

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Hi, - Original Message > > Yes, I think this should be pushed upstream - insert a "tee" in the > document stream so that all documents go to both masters. > Then use a load balancer to make requests of the masters. Hm, but this makes the tee app aware of this. What if I want to hi

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

> Oh, there is no DB involved.  Think of a document stream continuously coming > in, > a component listening to that stream, grabbing docs, and pushing it to > master(s). I don't think Solr is designed for this use case, eg, I wouldn't expect deterministic results with the current architecture as

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Hi, - Original Message > From: Robert Petersen > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 11:40:56 AM > Subject: RE: True master-master fail-over without data gaps > > If you have a wrapper, like an indexer app which prepares solr docs and > sends them into solr, the

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Hi, - Original Message > If you're using the delta import handler the problem would seem to go > away because you can have two separate masters running at all times, > and if one fails, you can then point the slaves to the secondary > master, that is guaranteed to be in sync because i

RE: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

If you have a wrapper, like an indexer app which prepares solr docs and sends them into solr, then it is simple. The wrapper is your 'tee' and it can send docs to both (or N) masters. -Original Message- From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:soko...@ifactory.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 4

SolrJ and digest authentication

I'm trying to do a search with SolrJ using digest authentication, but I'm getting the following error: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unauthorized I'm setting up SolrJ this way: HttpClient client = new HttpClient(); List authPrefs = new ArrayList(); authPrefs.add(AuthPolicy.DIGEST); cl

Re: Help -DIH (mail)

Log: 09/03/2011 11:54:58 org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: [mail] webapp=/solr path=/dataimport params={command=status} status=0 QTime=0 XML - 0 0 - - data-config.xml status idle - 0 0 0 2011-03-09 11:52:01 - Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 0 documents. Deleted 0 documents.

Re: Help -DIH (mail)

Hi, When you ran the status command, what was the output? On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Matias Alonso wrote: > Peter, > > You´re right; may be I expose wrong because of my english. > I done everything you told me. I think that no find the "folder" when index. > What you thinking about? > Belo

Re: Help -DIH (mail)

Peter, You´re right; may be I expose wrong because of my english. I done everything you told me. I think that no find the "folder" when index. What you thinking about? Below I show to you part of the log. 09/03/2011 11:52:01 org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: [mail] webapp=/solr path=/

Re: dataimport

This has since been fixed. The problem was that there was not enough memory on the machine. It works just fine now. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : INFO: Creating a connection for entity id with URL: > : > jdbc:mysql://localhost/researchsquare_beta_library?characterEn

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

If you're using the delta import handler the problem would seem to go away because you can have two separate masters running at all times, and if one fails, you can then point the slaves to the secondary master, that is guaranteed to be in sync because it's been importing from the same database? O

Re: NRT and warmupTime of filterCache

I think it's best to turn the warmupCount to zero because usually there isn't time in between the creation of a new searcher to run the warmup queries, eg, it'll negatively impact the desired goal of low latency new index readers? On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:41 AM, stockii wrote: > I tried to create

Re: NRT in Solr

Jae, NRT hasn't been implemented NRT as of yet in Solr, I think partially because major features such as replication, caching, and uninverted faceting suddenly are no longer viable, eg, it's another round of testing etc. It's doable, however I think the best approach is a separate request call pa

Re: Help -DIH (mail)

Hi, You've included some output in your message, so I presume something *did* happen when you ran the 'status' command (but it might not be what you wanted to happen :-) If you run: http://localhost:8983/solr/mail/dataimport?command=status and you get something like this back: idle It means t

Re: getting much double-Values from solr -- timeout

You have a large index with tough performance requirements on one server. I would analyze your system to see if it's got any bottlenecks. Watch out for auto-warming taking too long so it does not finish before next commit() Watch out for too frequent commits Monitor mem usage (JConsole or similar)

Re: NRT and warmupTime of filterCache

make it sense to update solr for getting SOLR-571 ??? - --- System One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores, 1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores < 100.000 - Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute

Re: Help -DIH (mail)

Hi Peter, When I execute the commands you mentioned, nothing happend. Below I show you the comands executed and the answered of they. Sorry, but I don´t know how to enable the log; my jre is by default. Rememeber I´m running the example-DIH (trunk\solr\example\example-DIH\solr); java -Dsolr.solr.h

Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps

Yes, I think this should be pushed upstream - insert a "tee" in the document stream so that all documents go to both masters. Then use a load balancer to make requests of the masters. The "tee" itself then becomes a possible single point of failure, but you didn't say anything about the archite

Re: NRT in Solr

maxWarmingSearcher=1 is good for current stable Solr versions where memory is important. Overlapping warming searchers can be extremely memory consuming. I don't know how cache warming behaves with NRT. On Wednesday 09 March 2011 11:27:39 stockii wrote: > question: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Ne

NRT and warmupTime of filterCache

I tried to create an NRT like in the wiki but i got some problems with autowarming and ondeckSearchers. ervery minute i start a delta of one core and the other core start every minute a commit of the index to search for it. wiki says ... => 1 Searcher and fitlerCache warmupCount=3600. with this

Re: Solr UIMA Wiki page

Great work! On Wednesday 09 March 2011 11:20:41 Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi all, > I just improved the Solr UIMA integration wiki page [1] so if anyone is > using it and/or has any feedback it'd be more than welcome. > Regards, > Tommaso > > [1] : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrUIMA -- Markus

Re: getting much double-Values from solr -- timeout

i am using NRT, and the caches are not always warmed, i think this is almost a problem !? - --- System One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores, 1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores < 100.000 - Solr1 for Se

Re: getting much double-Values from solr -- timeout

Are you using shards or have everything in same index? - shards == distributed Search over several cores ? => yes, but not always. but in generally not. What problem did you experience with the StatsCompnent? - if i use stats on my 34Million Index, no matter how many docs founded, the sum takes V

Re: NRT in Solr

question: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearchTuning 'PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=x i got this message. in my solrconfig.xml: maxWarmingSearchers=4, if i set this to 1 or 2 i got exception. with 4 i got nothing, but the Performance Warning. the wiki-articel says,

Solr UIMA Wiki page

Hi all, I just improved the Solr UIMA integration wiki page [1] so if anyone is using it and/or has any feedback it'd be more than welcome. Regards, Tommaso [1] : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrUIMA

Re: NRT in Solr

i am using solr for NRT with this version of solr ... Solr Specification Version: 4.0.0.2010.10.26.08.43.14 Solr Implementation Version: 4.0-2010-10-26_08-05-39 1027394 - hudson - 2010-10-26 08:43:14 Lucene Specification Version: 4.0-2010-10-26_08-05-39 Lucene Implementation Version: 4.0-2010-10-2

LucidGaze Monitoring tool

Hi all, Does anyone know what does m on the y -axis stands for in req/sec graph for update handler . -- Thanks & Regards, Isan Fulia.

Re: Problem adding new requesthandler to solr branch_3x

Hoss many thanks for the reply Paul On 8 March 2011 19:45, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : 1.  Why the problem occurs (has something changed between 1.4.1 and 3x)? > > Various pieces of code dealing with config parsing have changed since > 1.4.1 to be better about verifying that configs are meanin