Rebuild - the tokenizers/analyzers for string type would be different for
string and text type.
-Original Message-
From: Isha Garg
To: solr-user
Sent: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 10:51 am
Subject: change in field_type
Hii,
I want to confirm that if a change the type of a f
Hii,
I want to confirm that if a change the type of a field from
"sting" to "text" in schema.xml then whether i have rebuild the index or
will it works fine with previous index.
Johnny:
Are you still looking for help?
Wease
-
NOT always nice. When are we getting better releases?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-performance-very-slow-even-after-autowarming-tp2010384p2542789.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archi
It does not substitute values correctly in many cases. It seems to
work at a top level, but not in sub-levels.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Bill Bell wrote:
> I used it on 4,0 and it did not help us. We were bound on SQL io
>
> Bill Bell
> Sent from mobile
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:47 PM, M
Thanks for the adivce.
Where can I find stable snapshots, I only know of checking out from head?
On 2/20/11 11:56 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Not crazy -- but be aware of a few *key* caviates.
1. Do good testing on a stable snapshot.
2. Don't get surprised if you have to rebuild the index from sc
Not crazy -- but be aware of a few *key* caviates.
1. Do good testing on a stable snapshot.
2. Don't get surprised if you have to rebuild the index from scratch
to upgrade in the future. The official releases will upgrade smoothly
-- but within dev builds, anything may happen.
On Sat, Feb 19,
Hi,
Can I edit the SolrCloud page?
I never thought about it - but since it's a wiki -- everyone can edit,
right?
For the moment I'll not write stuff onto it - but if you need some help, I
can share you some of my ( little, but some ) experience.
2011/2/20 Otis Gospodnetic-2 [via Lucene] <
ml-no
Thanks Lee !
Your are right, I'm new to solr, and I didn't think about that point.
But in my case, target is newspaper articles, so it's more generic
contents that specialized contents and I suppose that a generic synonym
dictionnary should fit my needs. Thanks for the link !
Marc
Programmers.ch
As I said in my original post, I'd already tried various methods of escaping:
:call that using key = "id" and value =
:"-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d" and I get an exception. If I
:change value to "\"-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\"", I get no
:results. If I change value to "\-3f66fdfb1ef5
> He could also just escape it or am i
> missing something?
Yes, he can also just escape minus sign using back slash.
Hi Marc,
I don't want to sound to prissy and also assume to much about your
application but a generic synonym file could do more harm than good. Lots of
applications have specific vocabularies and a specific synonym list is what
is needed. Remember synonyms increase recall but reduce precision. The
He could also just escape it or am i missing something?
> --- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > From: Paul Tomblin
> > Subject: Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:53 PM
> > Yes, it's string:
> >
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> I have a field in my database, "id", which is the unique key. The id
> is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
> and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
> get a negative value. I'm
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> From: Paul Tomblin
> Subject: Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:53 PM
> Yes, it's string:
> class="solr.StrField"
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitN
Hello,
Is there any free Synonyms.txt available on internet ? Wasn't able to
find any. Specially interested by the french version.
++
Marc
--
*Programmers.ch*
Développement WEB
Solutions libres et Opensources
Tel: ++41 76 44 888 72
Site: http://www.programmers.ch
Yes, it's string:
Is there a better field definition I should be using?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> What is the field type of if field? Is it string?
>
> What happens when you do :
>
> &q={!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
>
> query.setQue
What is the field type of if field? Is it string?
What happens when you do :
&q={!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
query.setQuery("{!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d");
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> From: Paul Tomblin
> Subject: How to get a field that sta
I have a field in my database, "id", which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time figuring out the
right combination of
Hi,
In short, the bigger the overlap of query and document, the higher the
document's relevance to the query. This is an oversimplification, of course,
but that's the general idea (and it doesn't match what you listed below).
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hi Stijn,
Thank you for sharing this.
Would it at all be possible for you to update the parts of SolrCloud page that
are incorrect and that you figured out or add anything new that's not on that
page yet?
Thanks!
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosys
Isha,
Could be a case sensitivity thing. Try "crime" if that's what's that field
(you
can look manually when you run *:* or with Luke.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From:
Hi mrw,
It sounds like you (e)dismax is what you should look into. You didn't mention
it/them, so I'm assuming you're not aware of them.
See: http://search-lucene.com/?q=dismax+OR+edismax&fc_project=Solr
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem searc
Ron,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: "Olson, Ron"
> To: "solr-user@lucene.a
Tri,
What you are you trying to accomplish?
Otis
---
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Tri Nguyen
> To: solr user
> Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 9:02:44 PM
> Subject: adding a Tim
Ryan,
It's not possible out of the box, no. If your docs with abc* keywords have all
fields stored, you could get them from the index, modify them in memory to
remove abc*, and send them back to Solr for indexing. It's still reindexing,
but only of those particular documents and without havin
Jurgen,
> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk solr_svn
>
> According to the book I am reading I should be able to run the tests
> succesfully, so I did a
>
> /var/solr_svn# ant test
Between the above 2 commands you need to:
/var/solr_svn# cd solr
Otis
Sematext :: h
Hi Mark,
I don't think there's anything for 1.4.1. There are SOLR-236 and SOLR-1682 (in
trunk). Neither one works for distributed search. SOLR-2066 has a patch for
field collapsing / results grouping in distributed search, but it doesn't seem
to work well.
Otis
Sematext :: http://semat
27 matches
Mail list logo
