its just a joke?
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
http://lucidimagination.com
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/My-Plan-to-Scale-Solr-tp2516904p2524700.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Or even better, search with 'LSA'.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=SLA
>
> wunder
>
> On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
>
>> What's an 'LSA'
>>
>> Dennis Gearon
>>
>>
>> Signature Warning
>>
>> It is always a good i
Hi Markus,
As far i gone through the scoring of solr. The scoring is
done during searching on the use of boost values which were given during the
indexing.
I have a query now if i search for a keyword java then
1)if for a term named "java" in index contain 50,000 documents then do s
Some options to reduce performance implications are:
replication... index your documents in one solr instance, and query in a
different one. that way the users of the query side will not be as adversely
impacted by frequent changes. You have better control over when change
occurs.
separate s
: I am searching the keyword 25, in the field
:
: 30" TFT active matrix LCD, 2560 x 1600, .25mm
: dot pitch, 700:1 contrast
:
: I want to know the character position of matched keyword in the
: corresponding field.
:
: usb or cabl is not what I want.
your search is getting a match on the featu
We are indexing documents with several associated fields for search and
display,
some of which may change with a much higher frequency than the document
content.
As per my understanding, we have to resubmit the entire gamut of fields with
every update.
If the reindexing of the documents beco
The SolrQuerySyntax Wiki page refers to DateMathParser for examples.
When I tried "-1DAY", I got:
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse
'last_modified:-DAY':
Encountered " "-" "- "" at line 1, column 14.
Was expecting one of: "(" ... "*" ... ... ...
FYI, this should be fixed in the (very) latest trunk.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
> I've added a new field type in schema.xml:
>
> class="solr.StrField" sortMissingLast="true"
> omitNorms="true">
>
> class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> class="solr.KeepWordFilterFactory" words="format_facet.txt"
> ignoreCase="false" />
>
>
>
clas
I have a solr index where certain facet fields should only contain one
or more items from a limited list of values. To enforce this
restriction at index time I have been looking at using a
KeepWordFilterFactory. It seems it ought to work as I have it
implamented, and actually seems to work wh
Probably you could do it, and solving a problem in business supersedes
'rightness' concerns, much to the dismay of geeks and 'those who like rightness
and say the word "Neemph!" '.
the not rightness about this is that:
POST, PUT, DELETE are assumed to make changes to the URL's backend.
GET is
Yes, I think it's 1024 by default. I think you can raise it in your
config. But your performance may suffer.
Best would be to try and find a better way to do what you want without
using thousands of clauses. This might require some custom Java plugins
to Solr though.
On 2/17/2011 3:52 PM, m
Yeah, I tried switching to POST.
It seems to be handling the size, but apparently Solr has a limit on the
number of boolean comparisons -- I'm now getting "too many boolean clauses"
errors emanating from
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.prepare(QueryComponent.java:108).
:)
Th
Yes, you may use POST to make search requests to Solr.
Erik
On Feb 17, 2011, at 14:27 , mrw wrote:
>
> We are running into some issues with large queries. Initially, they were
> ostensibly header buffer overruns, because increasing Jetty's
> headerBufferSize value to 65536 resolved the
> I had a requirement to implement phrase proximity like ["a
> b c" w/5 "d e f"] for
> this i have implemented a custom query parser plug in which
> I make use of nested
> span queries to fulfill this requirement. Now it looks that
> documents are
> filtered correctly, but there is an issue in h
We are running into some issues with large queries. Initially, they were
ostensibly header buffer overruns, because increasing Jetty's
headerBufferSize value to 65536 resolved them. This seems like a kludge, but
it does solve the problem for 95% of our users.
However, we do have queries that are
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=SLA
wunder
On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> What's an 'LSA'
>
> Dennis Gearon
>
>
> Signature Warning
>
> It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
> better
> idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so yo
What's an 'LSA'
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself.
from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e03
We have 3 applications and they need to have different relevancy models,
synonyms, stop words etc.
App A - content size - 20 GB - MySQL and Drupal based app
App B - # of documents ~ 400K; index size ~ 25 GB - primarily a portal
with links to different applications, data sources include crawl page
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Paul wrote:
> Thanks, going to update now. This is a system that is currently
> deployed. Should I just update to 1.4.1, or should I go straight to
> 3.0? Does 1.4 => 3.0 require reindexing?
There is no 3.0 - that release happened before the Lucene/Solr merge,
he
Paul - go with 1.4.1 in this case.
Keep tabs on the upcoming 3.1 release (of both Lucene and Solr) and consider
that in a month or so.
Erik
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:04 , Paul wrote:
> Thanks, going to update now. This is a system that is currently
> deployed. Should I just update to 1.
Its fixed in 1.4.1.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1777
On Thursday 17 February 2011 16:04:18 Paul wrote:
> Thanks, going to update now. This is a system that is currently
> deployed. Should I just update to 1.4.1, or should I go straight to
> 3.0? Does 1.4 => 3.0 require reindexing?
>
Thanks, going to update now. This is a system that is currently
deployed. Should I just update to 1.4.1, or should I go straight to
3.0? Does 1.4 => 3.0 require reindexing?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Paul wrote:
>> Is this a known solr
Vincent,
Look at Solr's fq (filter query) capability. You'll likely want to put your
restricting query in an fq parameter from your search client.
If your restricting query is a simple TermQuery, have a look at the various
built-in query parsers in Solr. On trunk you can do this: &fq={!term
Hi,
I'm porting/upgrading a project from Lucene to Solr.
In Lucene, I was using the user-provided Lucene query string, and I did
complete it to implement access restriction, based on fields saved in the
index:
Query userQ=... // query from user
Query restrictQ=.. // implement restrictions
Query
I was also gonna say why even worry about using XPath when you can write a SQL
query to get your data out. Thats what i did and it seems much simpler and cuts
out a step.
Adam
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Bill Bell wrote:
> Does anyone have an example of using this with
If your using a DIH for SQL server you can configure it however you want. Here
is a
snippet of my code. Note the Driver you need to grab from sourcenet.
>
>driver="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"
> url
Both, you should also read about scoring.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/scoring.html
On Thursday 17 February 2011 13:39:05 satya swaroop wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have a query whether the solr shows the results of documents by
> calculating the score on dynamic or is it pre calculating a
Have a read:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/scoring.html
On Thursday 17 February 2011 12:50:08 Churchill Nanje Mambe wrote:
> Hi
> I would love to know how to do this with solr
> say a user inputs "Account manager files",
> I wish that solr puts priority on the documents it finds as follow
Hi All,
I have a query whether the solr shows the results of documents by
calculating the score on dynamic or is it pre calculating and supplying??..
for example:
if a query is made on q=solr in my index... i get a results of 25
documents... what is it calculating?? i am very keen to
Uh, how about the LuceneQParser? It does some checks and can return
appropriate error messages.
On Thursday 17 February 2011 06:44:16 csj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if it is possible to let the user build up a Solr Query and have
> it validated by some java API before sending it to Solr.
>
> Is
Hi,
I'm currently looking at SolrCloud. I've managed to set up a scalable
cluster with ZooKeeper.
( see the examples in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud for a quick
understanding )
This way, all different shards / replicas are stored in a centralised
configuration.
Moreover the ZooKeeper con
Hi Bing Li,
On Thursday 17 February 2011 10:32:11 Bing Li wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I started to learn how to use Solr three months ago. My experiences are
> still limited.
>
> Now I crawl Web pages with my crawler and send the data to a single Solr
> server. It runs fine.
>
> Since the potential
If you set maxWarmingSearchers to 1 then you cannot issue an overlapping
commit. Slaves won't poll for a new index version while replication is in
progress.
It works well in my environment where there is a high update/commit frequency,
about a thousand documents per minute. The system even beha
Hi
I would love to know how to do this with solr
say a user inputs "Account manager files",
I wish that solr puts priority on the documents it finds as follows
1) documents containing account manager files gets a greater score
2) then documents with account manager come next
3) then documents
Hi,
Keeping the thread alive, any thought on only doing replication if
there is no warming currently going on?
Cheers,
Dan
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:09 AM, dan sutton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If the replication window is too small to allow a new searcher to warm
> and close the current searcher before
Dear all,
I started to learn how to use Solr three months ago. My experiences are
still limited.
Now I crawl Web pages with my crawler and send the data to a single Solr
server. It runs fine.
Since the potential users are large, I decide to scale Solr. After
configuring replication, a single ind
Push again.
Regards
Em wrote:
>
> Just wanted to push that topic.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Em wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I must jump in this discussion: From a logical point of view what you are
>> saying makes only sense if both instances do not run on the same machine
>> or at least not on t
Hi,
I recently ran across the same issues;
I'm updating my solr 1.4 up to the last Nightly Build ( to have ZooKeeper
functionality ).
I've copied the solr_home dir - but with no success.
( The config files were not accepted on the new build - due to version
mismatch ).
Then I copied only the inde
39 matches
Mail list logo
