In schema you can define as many fields you want .There is not any concept of
subfield.If you want many values can be added then use MultiValued field fro
that.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Regardind-subfield-Enquiry-tp2270574p2270869.
I have configured a request handled for autosuggest (used term component for
autosuggest) with last component as spellcheck component.
and query with terms.prefix and spellcheck=true
It gives the output from terms component and also output from spellchek
component
exact handler configuration cur
On Monday 17 January 2011 12:10 PM, Grijesh wrote:
Define a new field gender for that and for query use filter
gender:male/female
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
actually i want to enquire the subfield concept in schema like if I have
field name=clause and can it be divided into subfields Subject,Verb
Hi Grijesh,
As you said you are implementing this type. Can you tell how
did you made in brief..
Regards,
satya
I have Not implemented on any public site .
I just seen the auto-suggest list of google which have the lists containing
both auto-suggest and spell-check
Like just type on google "jave"
it will give the suggestion
java script
java se
jave staffing
java string
jave s
So i was trying to impleme
Define a new field gender for that and for query use filter
gender:male/female
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Regardind-subfield-Enquiry-tp2270574p2270636.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Can we define subfield of a field in schema.
like if I defined a field name=Person can I define subfields
Male,Female for Person field. Tell me how to implement this type of
requirement in schema.xml.
Well anyways thanks for the help.
Also can you please reply to this about .frq file (since that's quite big
too).
"Also regarding .frq file why exactly is it needed? Is it required in phrase
searching (I am not using highlighting or MoreLikeThis on this index file)
too? and this is not made if a
Hi,
I'm not a big fan of putting all fields in a single field (bye bye dismax, as
you say), but if you are asking whether doing it via copyField or "directly" is
will make a difference - not really.
If you do it with copyField, you still get to keep your individual fields,
which
could serve yo
Hm, this is a mystery to me - I don't see anything that would turn on Term
Vectors...
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Salman Akram
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> S
In those poms, not all modules have explicit version and groupId which
is a bad practice. Also some parent references contain invalid default
(../pom.xml) relativePath - path to their parent pom.xml. Paths to
build directories look suspicious to me. lucene-bdb module references
missing library com.
You need to add another parameter which defines the 'id' field. 'id'
is required- it is unique for every document. Usually you can pick
the filename.
Lance
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
> ok, now in the 4 test, it works ? ok.. i dont know... it works.. but now i
> have a Oh
I have to support both general searches (free form text) and directed
searches (field:val field2:val). To do the general search I have a field
defined as:
and several copyField commands like:
Note that tags and features are multi-value themselves. So after indexing I
have a 'genera
Please see below the dir listing and relevant part of schema file (I have
removed the name part from fields for obvious reasons).
Also regarding .frq file why exactly is it needed? Is it required in phrase
searching (I am not using highlighting or MoreLikeThis on this index file)
too? and this is
Patrick,
I went to http://search-lucene.com/solr and searched for: pcj
Hit # 2 shows this response:
http://search-lucene.com/m/SUTgW1ELRsZ
Note where pcj & friends should be placed. I hope this fixes the problem.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene eco
Dear all,
I really enjoy using Solr so far. During the last days I tried to activate the
ClusteringComponent in Solr as indicated here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent
and copied all the relevant java libraries in the WEB-INF/lib folder of my
tomcat installation of Solr.
But e
Hm, want to email the index dir listing (ls -lah) + the field type and field
definitions from your schema.xml?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Salman Akram
> To: solr-u
PS one other point I didn't mention is that this server has a very
fast autocommit limit (2 seconds max time).
But I don't know if this is relevant -- I thought the files in the
snapshot wouldn't be committed to again. Please correct me if this is
a huge misunderstanding.
On 16 January 2011 12:30
Nops. I optimized it with Standard File Format and cleaned up Index dir
through Luke. It adds upto to the total size when I optimized it with
Compound File Format.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is it possible that the tvf file you are loo
Is it possible that the tvf file you are looking at is old (i.e. not part of
your active index)?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Salman Akram
> To: solr-user@lucene.apa
(Many apologies if this appears twice, I tried to send it via Nabble
first but it seems to have got stuck, and is fairly urgent/serious.)
Hi,
I'm trying to use the replication handler to take snapshots, then
archive them and ship them off-site.
Just now I got a message from tar that worried me:
Some more info I copied it from Luke and below is what it says for...
Text Fields --> stored/uncompressed,indexed,tokenized
String Fields --> stored/uncompressed,indexed,omitTermFreqAndPositions
The main contents field is not stored so it doesn't show up on Luke but that
is Analyzed and Tokenized
Hi,
>From my understanding TVF file stores the Term Vectors (Positions/Offset) so
if no field has Field.TermVector set (default is NO) so it shouldn't be
created, right?
I have an index created through SOLR on which no field had any value for
TermVectors so by default it shouldn't be saved. All t
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Salman Akram
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SOLR 1.4.1 uses Lucene 2.9.3 by default (I think so). I have few questions
>
> Are there any major performance (or other) improvements in Lucene
> 3.0.3/Lucene 2.9.4?
you can see all major changes here:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3
24 matches
Mail list logo
