I've downloaded
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x
and ran ant there. I've followed the tutorial but
highlighting on analyzer debug screen isn't working.
This link found in the tutorial doesn't show any highlight.
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp?name=nam
Hi,
I was trying to use Solr Cell (through the Java API) to index a pdf file.
The class has been extracted from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ContentStreamUpdateRequestExample
public class Solr {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
String solrId = "beautiful_stm.pdf";
in
Hello all,
We are getting intermittent socket timeout errors (see below). Out of about
600,000 indexing requests, 30 returned these socket timeout errors. We haven't
been able to correlate these with large merges, which tends to slow down the
indexing response rate.
Does anyone know where we
Greetings Everyone -
I am hoping someone can help me with this unusual issue I have here.
Issue
Indexing information in a database (i.e. /dataimport [full-import]) succeeds
when I perform this function on a Mac OS X 10.6 with Java 1.6, but fails when I
attempt the same indexing task on a 10.5
This is my configuration which seems to work just fine.
>From there it's just a matter of running the select statement and mapping it
against the correct fields in your index.
Adam
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Shane Perry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of migrating our system
: there is no more trunk support for 2.9 indexes.
:
: So I tried the suggested solution to execute an optimize to convert a 2.9.3
: index to a 3.x index.
:
: However, when I tried to the optimize a 2.9.3 index using the Solr 4.0 trunk
: version with luceneMatchVersion set to LUCENE_30 in the sol
> When I use the post.jar tool, I don't get any meaningful
> errors if there's
> some kind of mismatch between the schema and the XML
> 's I'm loading.
>
> All I get is:
> FATAL: Solr returned an error: Internal Server Error
>
> There's no information about what fields were missing,
> additional
: Thanks for your response. Our production environment is a read only file
: system. It is not allowing to modify or create new files under conf folder
: at runtime. So copy config through replication is not working for us.
if your entire production server is read only, where do you keep your
When I use the post.jar tool, I don't get any meaningful errors if there's
some kind of mismatch between the schema and the XML 's I'm loading.
All I get is:
FATAL: Solr returned an error: Internal Server Error
There's no information about what fields were missing, additional fields,
wrong data,
Hi,
I am in the process of migrating our system from Postgres 8.4 to Solr
1.4.1. Our system is fairly complex and as a result, I have had to define
19 base entities in the data-config.xml definition file. Each of these
entities executes 5 queries. When doing a full-import, as each entity
comple
Ok, I have look at it and it almost solves my problem...
My rules list demand to counting only once each token, not each field...
Any idea on how it can be done?
Currently I'm using pure logic to accomplish this, more or less like
"FieldA:token1 OR (FieldB:token1 AND -FieldA:token1) OR (FieldC:t
Hum, if so, it may resolve the problem. I didn't know that. I´ll take a
look.
Thanks.
--
Nelson Branco
SAPO Mapas/GIS
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: quarta-feira, 5 de Janeiro de 2011 02:12
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: C
according to
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg40491.html
there is no more trunk support for 2.9 indexes.
So I tried the suggested solution to execute an optimize to convert a 2.9.3
index to a 3.x index.
However, when I tried to the optimize a 2.9.3 index using the Solr
Making sure the index can fit in memory (you don't have to allocate that
much to Solr, just make sure it's available to the OS so it can cache it --
otherwise you are paging the hard drive, which is why you are probably IO
bound) has been the key to our performance. We recently opted to use less
RA
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 10:57 +0100, supersoft wrote:
[5 shards, 100GB, ~20M documents]
...
[Low performance for concurrent searches]
> Using JConsole for monitoring the server java proccess I checked that Heap
> Memory and the CPU Usages don't reach the upper limits so the server
> shouldn't per
Hello,
What I am trying to do is build a personalized search engine. The aim
is to have the resulting documents' scores depend on users' preferences.
I've already built some Solr plugins (request handlers mainly), however I am
not sure that what I am trying to do can be achieved by a plugin.
Hmmm, certainly try optimize, but often the problem
is in how you query. Providing some examples of
slow queries and the time it takes to get them would help.
Also, running with &debugQuery=on will show you a QTime
field in the response header that is the number of milliseconds
the actual query to
It sounds like your system is I/O bound and I suspect (bet even) that all your
index files are on the same disk drive. Also you have only 8GB of RAM for 100GB
of index, so while your SOLR instance will cache some stuff and the balance
will be used for caching file blocks, there really isn't enou
Hi list,
currently the Transformers return row but can I skip
or drop a row from the Transformer?
If so, what should I return in that case, an empty row?
Regards,
Bernd
The reason of this distribution is the kind of the documents. In spite of
having the same schema structure (and solr conf), a document belongs to 1 of
5 different kinds.
Each kind corresponds to a concrete shard and due to this, the implemented
client tool avoids searching in all the shards when
open a new mail conversation for that
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-Solr-performance-tp2210843p2211300.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Always interesting question! Anyone could purpose a generic (and approximate)
equation:
Search_time = F(Nb_of_servers, RAM_size_per_server, CPU_of_servers,
Nb_of_shards, Nb_of_documents, Total_size_of_documents or
Average_size_of_a_document, Nb_requests_in_minute, Nb_indexed_fields_in_inde
shards are used when index size become huge and performance going down .
shards mean distributed indexes. But if you will put all shards on same
machine as multicore then it will not help too much on performance.
and also shards distributes indexes near equals in size.
There is also not enough Ra
shards are used when index size become huge and performance going down .
shards mean distributed indexes. But if you will put all shards on same
machine as multicore then it will not help too much on performance.
and also shards distributes indexes near equals in size.
There is also not enough Ra
1 - Yes, all the shards are in the same machine
2 - The machine RAM is 7.8GB and I assign 3.4GB to Solr server
3 - The shards sizes (GB) are 17, 5, 3, 11, 64
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-Solr-performance-tp2210843p2211135.html
Sent from the Solr -
Some questions-
1-Are all shards on same machine
2-What is your Ram Size
3-What are the size of index on each shards in GB
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-Solr-performance-tp2210843p2210878.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
I will be out of the office starting 07/01/2011 and will not return until
17/01/2011.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
Action Images is a division of Reuters Limited and your data will therefore be
protected
in accordance with the Reuters Group Privacy / Data P
have deployed a 5-sharded infrastructure where: shard1 has 3124422 docs
shard2 has 920414 docs shard3 has 602772 docs shard4 has 2083492 docs shard5
has 11915639 docs Indexes total size: 100GB
The OS is Linux x86_64 (Fedora release 8) with vMem equal to 7872420 and I
run the server using Jetty (f
have deployed a 5-sharded infrastructure where: shard1 has 3124422 docs
shard2 has 920414 docs shard3 has 602772 docs shard4 has 2083492 docs shard5
has 11915639 docs Indexes total size: 100GB
The OS is Linux x86_64 (Fedora release 8) with vMem equal to 7872420 and I
run the server using Jetty (f
On 1/6/2011 2:45 PM, Grijesh.singh wrote:
use as pharase it will work like "Computer / IT" for you
Here IT is a stopword when you are trying query as
category:Computer / IT
parsed as category:Computer:IT
but IT is a stopword for default search field what you have selected
so second query remo
There is a csv update handler in solr you can use it by modifying your
logfile
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Input-raw-log-file-tp2210043p2210673.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hallo, i have a Index withe 800.000 Dokuments, and now i hope it will be
Faster, if i optimize the Index, it sounds good ;-)
But i cant find an Example to Optimize one of milticors or all cors..
Maby one of you have a little example for that ..
King
32 matches
Mail list logo
