Hi,
I am pondering making use of field collapsing. I am currently indexing clauses
(sections) inside UN documents:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search/unifiedResults?q=africa&=&t[22]=medication&dc=&st=clause
Now since right now my data set is still fairly small I am doing field
collapsing in use
There are three xml sets. The solr/example set, the drupal solr, AND
the set in contrib/clustering/src/test/resources/solr/conf/. These are
what clustering is actually tested with. So, the first order of
business is to check if clustering works with example/solr/conf. The
diffs looked like the clus
In a post document, or a get document with URL encoded variables in the BODY of
the document, it's possible to specify/use different encodings that are
actually
specified in the headers. For SURE in post, and I'm pretty sure in GET also.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is
I also thought that this might be the case a few hours ago.
However, I have to verify that tomorrow.
>From a debugging point of view:
How can I set the encoding of my browser's adress-bar?
When I pressed enter the encoding switched from clear-text to an urlencoded
version.
The urlencoded version
Yeah I know, you have to download the libraries and copy them to your /lib
inside of Solr. In Solr 1.4 the plugin is available but the libraries are not.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/28/solrs-new-clustering-capabilities/
I think there is something wrong with the schema and solrco
Carrot is already part of the Solr distributions. 1.4.1 and 3.x and the trunk.
On 11/7/10, Eric Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Solr and nutch have been working fine. I now want to integrate Carrot2. I
> followed this tutorial/quickstart:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/28/solrs-new-cl
Is it possible that your original search is being posted (HTTP POST),
and the character encoding of the page with the form is not UTF-8? In
that case, I believe a header gets sent with the request specifying a
different character set (different from parameters in the URL, for
which it's not p
p
10 groups (assuming rows=10) in memory at any one time, hence it has
no idea what the total number of groups is.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
______ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5599 (20101107) __
The message was checked by ESE
nightly build.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5598 (20101107) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ve
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Papp Richard wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> I've just tried the latest stable version from nightly build:
> apache-solr-4.0-2010-11-05_08-06-28.war
>
> I have some concerns however: I have 3 documents; 2 in the first group, 1
> in the 2nd group.
>
> 1. I got for matches
AM, Papp Richard wrote:
> this is fantastic, but can you tell any time it will be ready ?
It already is ;-) Grab the latest trunk or the latest nightly build.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5598
Hi,
Solr and nutch have been working fine. I now want to integrate Carrot2. I
followed this tutorial/quickstart:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/28/solrs-new-clustering-capabil
ities/
I didn't see anything to adjust in my schema so I didn't do anything there.
I did add the code
OK, thanks. I am using nutch and figuring out how to use urlfilters,
unsuccessfully. Just thought there might be a way I could save some trouble
this way. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 8:46 AM
To: solr-user
You can always do a delete-by-query, but that pre-supposes you can form
a query that would remove only those documents with URLs you want
removed... Assuming you do this, an optimize would then physically
remove the documents from your index (delete by query just marks
the docs as deleted).
Solr h
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running the risk of performing a swap when
you don't me
rus signature
database 5598 (20101107) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5598 (20101107) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
h
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Papp Richard wrote:
> this is fantastic, but can you tell any time it will be ready ?
It already is ;-) Grab the latest trunk or the latest nightly build.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
ion of virus signature
database 5576 (20101029) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5598 (20101107) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
This helped a lot, since it solved the "göteburg"-problem.
Thank you, Ken! Great help :-).
Unfortunately there are some other encoding problems
"fq=testcat%3Aacôme" worked, however the full url-encoded version
"fq=testcat%3Aac%F4me" does not.
The first version is the result of submitting the f
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Em wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> thank you for your quick answer!
>
> To make sure that there occurs no mistakes at my application's side, I send
> my requests with the form that is available at solr/admin/form.jsp
>
> I changed almost nothing from the example-configurati
Hi Ken,
thank you for your quick answer!
To make sure that there occurs no mistakes at my application's side, I send
my requests with the form that is available at solr/admin/form.jsp
I changed almost nothing from the example-configurations within the
example-package except some auto-commit par
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Em wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> I got an issue with my Solr-environment in Tomcat.
> First: I am not very familiar with Tomcat, so it might be my fault and not
> Solr's.
>
> It can not be a solr-side configuration problem, since everything worked
> fine with my local Je
Hi List,
I got an issue with my Solr-environment in Tomcat.
First: I am not very familiar with Tomcat, so it might be my fault and not
Solr's.
It can not be a solr-side configuration problem, since everything worked
fine with my local Jetty-servlet container.
However, when I deploy into Tomcat,
Hi All,
I am using MoreLikeThis.java in lucene to expand the query with related terms.
It works fine and I could retrieve the relevant documents to the query but I
couldn’t know how to extract the related terms to the query for the index.
my task is:
For example query is "bank" related terms
Hi All,
I am using MoreLikeThis.java in lucene to expand the query with related terms.
It works fine and I could't retrieve the relevant documents to the query but I
couldn’t know how to extract the related terms to the query for the index.
my task is:
For example query is "bank" related
25 matches
Mail list logo