On 10/29/2010 4:33 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
The recommended method of safely upgrading Solr that I've read about
is to upgrade slave servers, keeping your production application
pointed either at another set of slave servers or your master
servers. Then you test it with a dev copy of your appli
I'm having difficulty properly escaping ? in my search queries. It seems as
tho it matches any character.
Some info, a simplified schema and query to explain the issue I'm having.
I'm currently running solr1.4.1
Schema:
I want to return any first name with a Question Mark in it
Query: first_
Does Solr support Natural Language Search? I did not find any thing about
this in the reference manual. Please let me know.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Does-Solr-support-Natural-Language-Search-tp1839262p1839262.html
Sent from the Solr - User maili
> However, we have found that this query is crashing when
> using
> CoomplexPhraseQuery:
> "sulfur-reducing bacteria"
>
> It is due to the dash inside the phrase.
> Here is the trace:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown query type
> "org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery" found in phrase
Yes I also did see the exclude="true" in an example elevate.xml...was
wondering what it does precisely and if "text" MUST have a value ? I couldnt
find any documentation explaining it
Ravi Kiran Bhaskar
Principal Software Engineer
Washington Post
1150 15th Street NW, Washington, DC
Mr.Rochkind pointed out the exact requirement I had in mind i.e. "filter
query from external list of Solr unique IDs". On the flip side, even filter
queries can be dicey for me as I could very easily blow past the 1024 bytes
URL GET limit as my original queries itself are very long..just adding 100
Due to popular demand, the link to my slides @ ZendCon are now available
here in case anyone else is looking for it.
http://slidesha.re/bAXNF3
The sample code will be uploaded shortly.
Feedback is also appreciated
http://joind.in/2261
--
°O°
"Good Enough" is not good enough.
To give anything
Be aware, though, that relevance isn't absolute, it's only interesting
#within# a query. And it's
then normed between 0 and 1. So picking "a certain value" is rarely doing
what you think it will.
Limiting to the top N docs is usually more reasonable
But this may be an XY problem. What is it yo
Do you use EmbeddedSolr in the query server? There is a memory leak
that shows up when taking a lot of replications.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Ah, but reading Peter's email message I reference more carefully, it seems
> that Solr already DOES provide an info-level
A filter that could accept a list of SOLR document IDs as articulated by Tom
Burton-West would enable some important features for our application. So if
anyone is wondering if this would be a useful feature, consider this a yes
vote.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:roch
> Is it possible to filter my search
> results by relevance? For example, anything below a certain
> value shouldn't be returned?
>
http://search-lucene.com/m/4AHNF17wIJW1/
How does the exclude="true" option in elevate.xml perform with large number of
excludes?
Then you could have a separate elevate config for that client.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 3. nov. 2010, at 20.11, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010
I have 3 fields in my index that I use in a dismax query with boosts and phrase
boosts.
I've realised that 1 field I'm not really interested in at all, unless the
search term is in that field as a phrase.
Is it realistic to set the normal boost to zero for this field, but the phrase
boost to
I don't believe there is, but it occurs to me that the additional
feature that Tom Burton-West contemplates in the thread "filter query
from external list of Solr unique IDs" could potentially address your
problem too, if it existed. I think that feature could also address a
variety of problems
Is it possible to filter my search results by relevance? For example, anything
below a certain value shouldn't be returned?
I also retrieve facet counts in my search queries, so it would be useful if the
facet counts also respected the filter on the relevance.
Thank You.
Jason.
If you wish to
I don't quite understand what you mean by that. Did you mean TermVector
Components?
Also, I did some more digging and I found some messages on this mailing list
about filtering. From what I understand, using the standard query handler
(solr/select/?q=...) with a qt parameter allows you to filter
> Regarding "Negative or zero value for fieldNorm", I don't see any
> negative fieldNorms here... just very small positive ones?
Of course, you're right. The E-# got twisted in my mind and became negative.
Silly me.
> Anyway the fieldNorm is the product of the lengthNorm and the
> index-time bo
Hi, If the synonym.txt file define the following
castle,fort
I am able to match "fort" when the user wants to search for "castle".
However, I would like to tell the user that "castle" is a synonym for
"fort". It is for those users that may wonder why they got a different
search result when they w
Try adding TFV's (term frequency vectors) to the title field as well as
the body.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:41:35 -0700 (PDT), ahammad
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to implement a "Related Articles" feature within my search
> application using the mlt handler.
>
> To give you a little background
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> How dynamic is this list? Is it feasable to add a field to your docs like
> blacklisteddocs, and at editorial's discretion add values to that field
> like "app1", "app2"?
>
> At that point you can just filter them out via a filter query...
R
How dynamic is this list? Is it feasable to add a field to your docs like
blacklisteddocs, and at editorial's discretion add values to that field
like "app1", "app2"?
At that point you can just filter them out via a filter query...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
>
Regarding "Negative or zero value for fieldNorm", I don't see any
negative fieldNorms here... just very small positive ones?
Anyway the fieldNorm is the product of the lengthNorm and the
index-time boost of the field (which is itself the product of the
index time boost on the document and the inde
Hello,
I'm trying to implement a "Related Articles" feature within my search
application using the mlt handler.
To give you a little background information, my Solr index contains a single
core that is created by merging 10+ other cores. Within this core is my main
data item known as an "article
Hello,
I have a single core servicing 3 different applications, one of the
application doesnt want some specific docs to show up (driven by Editorial
decision). Over a period of time the amount of blacklisted docs could grow,
hence I do not want to restrict them in a query as it the query c
Hi all,
I've got some puzzling issue here. During tests i noticed a document at the
bottom of the results where it should not be. I query using DisMax on title
and content field and have a boost on title using qf. Out of 30 results, only
two documents also have the term in the title.
Using deb
> Our application currently maintains synonyms in its
> database ; we could
> export this data to 'synonyms.txt', but would prefer a db
> aware
> implementationv of SynonymFilterFactory, i.e. avoiding that
> middle step.
>
> From the looks of the class (private instances, static
> methods), it doe
Hi all,
Can anyone comment on the ease/merit of overriding the shipped
SynonymFilterFactory with a version that could load the synonyms from an
alternate data source?
Our application currently maintains synonyms in its database ; we could
export this data to 'synonyms.txt', but would prefer a db
iorixxx wrote:
>
>
> I added this change to SOLR-1604, can you test it give us feedback?
>
>
Hi,
Sorry for the delay.
We have tested the change and it is OK for this.
However, we have found that this query is crashing when using
CoomplexPhraseQuery:
"sulfur-reducing bacteria"
It is due to
Ah, but reading Peter's email message I reference more carefully, it
seems that Solr already DOES provide an info-level log warning you about
over-lapping warming, awesome. (But again, I'm pretty sure it does NOT
throw or HTTP error in that condition, based on my and others experience).
> To
I hadn't looked at the code, am not familiar with Solr code, and can't
say what that code does.
But I have experienced issues that I _believe_ were caused by too
frequent commits causing over-lapping searcher preperation. And I've
definitely seen Solr documentation that suggests this is an iss
Basically, Solr doesn't do that. It seems to be a frequent topic on the
listserv, people wanting Solr to be able to do something like that. But,
as far as I know, it doesn't -- and I don't have a good idea of
alternate ways to solve that kind of problem either.
Try put everything in the same c
Be careful of multi-term queries and String types. By multi-term here,
I mean multi-term according to the 'pre-tokenization' that dismax and
standard parsers do -- basically on whitespace. If you have a string
with whitespace as a single (non-tokenized field) in a Solr String type,
and you h
Another option is to override the default operator in the query.
{!lucene q.op=OR}city:Chicago^10 +Romantic +View
Colin.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Sokolov [mailto:soko...@ifactory.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:42 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: kenf_nc
>
Hi everyone,
Long question but please hold on. I'm using a multicore Solr instance to
index different documents from different sources( around 4) and I'm using a
common config for all the cores. So, for each source I have core and temp
core like 'doc' and 'doc-temp'. So, everytime I want to get n
Another alternative (prettier to my eye), would be:
(city:Chicago AND Romantic AND View)^10 OR (Romantic AND View)
-Mike
On 11/03/2010 09:28 AM, kenf_nc wrote:
Unfortunately the default operator is set to AND and I can't change that at
this time.
If I do (city:Chicago^10 OR Romantic OR Vi
As far as I know, in the core admin page you can find when was the last time
an index had a modification and was comitted checking the lastModified.
But? what startTime and uptime mean?
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Core-status-uptime-and-s
Unfortunately the default operator is set to AND and I can't change that at
this time.
If I do (city:Chicago^10 OR Romantic OR View) it returns way too many
unwanted results.
If I do (city:Chicago^10 OR (Romantic AND View)) it returns less unwanted
results, but still a lot.
iorixxx's solution o
> My impression was that
>
> city:Chicago^10 +Romantic +View
>
> would do what you want (with the standard lucene query
> parser and default operator OR), and I'm not sure about
> this, but I have a feeling that the version with "Boolean"
> operators AND/OR and parens might actually net out to th
Also, your deltaImportQuery should be:
deltaImportQuery='SELECT * FROM "Entities" WHERE
"ent_id"=${dataimporter.delta.id}"'
Otherwise you're just importing the ids and not the rest of the data.
If performance is important to you, you might also want to check out
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mo
Juan,
that's correct .. solr will not touch your database, that's part of your
application-code. solr uses an updated timestamp (which is available
through dataimporter.last_index_time).
so, image the following situation, solr import runs every 10 minutes .. last
run at 11:00, your entity gets up
Sorry about the late response to this, but was on holidays.
No, as of right now there is not the same schema in each shard.
I need to be able to search a set of data resources with manually defined data
fields. All of those fields are searchable.
Any one of these resources can be added to an
Have a look at ajax-solr
http://evolvingweb.github.com/ajax-solr/
in the tutorial is an example of an autocompletion widget.
tob
From:
Amit Nithian
To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date:
03.11.2010 07:36
Subject:
Re: Solr like for autocomplete field?
I implemented the edge ngrams solution a
42 matches
Mail list logo
