On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ron Mayer wrote:
> I have some documents with a bunch of attachments (images, thumbnails
> for them, audio clips, word docs, etc); and am currently dealing with
> them by just putting a path on a filesystem to them in solr; and then
> jumping through hoops of keep
LOL!
We ARE programmers, and we do like absolutes :-)
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them
yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.
On 10/27/2010 8:34 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I started to upgrade my slave servers from 1.4.1 to 3.1-dev checked
out this morning. Because of SOLR-2034 (new javabin version) the
replication fails.
Asking about it in comments on SOLR-2034 brought up the suggestion of
switching to XML instead of
I have some documents with a bunch of attachments (images, thumbnails
for them, audio clips, word docs, etc); and am currently dealing with
them by just putting a path on a filesystem to them in solr; and then
jumping through hoops of keeping them in sync with solr.
Would it be nuts to stick the i
Hi people,
I'm trying to configure a little solr cluster but I need to shard the
documents.
I configured my solr with core0 (/opt/solr/core0) and installer the
zookeeper (/opt/zookeeper).
1. On my solrconfig.xml I added the lines below:
host1:2181
http://host1:8983/solr/core0
5000
I couldn't even get the bq= to work with negated queries, although
with edismax, negated queries work with just q=-term
Works:
/solr/select?qt=edismax&q=-red
Here is the failed attempt with dismax
/solr/select?qt=dismax&rows=1&indent=true&q=-red&bq=*:*^0.001&echoParams=all&debugQuery=true
{
"r
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Is it OK to call and increment a Searcher ref (i.e. SolrCore.getSearcher())
> in a SolrEventListener.postCommit() hook as long as I decrement it when I am
> done? I need to get a handle on an IndexReader so I can dump out a portion
> of
On Oct 29, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> Thanks to all and I made Solr work very well on one newer machine.
>
> Now I am setting up Solr on an older server with an IDE hard drive.
>
> Unfortunately, populating the index takes FOREVER due to
> Solr/Lucene/Tomcat calling fsync() a lot af
Is it OK to call and increment a Searcher ref (i.e. SolrCore.getSearcher()) in
a SolrEventListener.postCommit() hook as long as I decrement it when I am done?
I need to get a handle on an IndexReader so I can dump out a portion of the
index to an external process.
Thanks,
Grant
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > Why don't we just include the start & rows (modulo the window size) in
> : > the cache key?
> :
> : The implementation of equals() would be rather difficult... actually
> : impossible w/o abusing the semantics.
> : It would also be im
: > Why don't we just include the start & rows (modulo the window size) in
: > the cache key?
:
: The implementation of equals() would be rather difficult... actually
: impossible w/o abusing the semantics.
: It would also be impossible w/o the Map implementation guaranteeing
: what object was on
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : This is a limitation in the SolrCache API.
> : The key into the cache does not contain rows, so the cache returns the
> : first 10 docs and increments it's hit count. Then the cache user
> : (SolrIndexSearcher) looks at the entry and d
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ezequiel Calderara wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> I'm in a weird situation here.
> We have index a set of documents which are ordered using a linked list (each
> documents has the reference of the previous and the next).
>
> Is there a way when sorting in the solr search,
: This is a limitation in the SolrCache API.
: The key into the cache does not contain rows, so the cache returns the
: first 10 docs and increments it's hit count. Then the cache user
: (SolrIndexSearcher) looks at the entry and determines it can't use it.
Wow, I never realized that.
Why don't
There's no way I know of to make Solr use that kind of data to create the sort
order you want.
Generally for 'custom' sorts, you want to create a field in your Solr index
with possibly artificially constructed values that will 'naturally' sort the
way you want.
How to do that with a linked l
Hi all guys!
I'm in a weird situation here.
We have index a set of documents which are ordered using a linked list (each
documents has the reference of the previous and the next).
Is there a way when sorting in the solr search, Use the linked list to sort?
If that is not possible, how can i use
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Jay Luker wrote:
> This makes sense but still doesn't explain what I'm seeing in my cache
> stats. When I issue a request with rows=10 the stats show an insert
> into the queryResultCache. If I send the same query, this time with
> rows=1000, I would not expect to
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> The queryResultCache is keyed on and the
> value is a "DocList" object ...
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/search/DocList.html
>
> Unlike the Document objects in the documentCache, the DocLists in the
> queryResultCa
Thanks to all and I made Solr work very well on one newer machine.
Now I am setting up Solr on an older server with an IDE hard drive.
Unfortunately, populating the index takes FOREVER due to
Solr/Lucene/Tomcat calling fsync() a lot after every write.
I would like to know how to disable fsync.
Hi Ron,
In a nutshell - an indexed field is searchable, and a stored field has its
content stored in the index so it is retrievable. Here are some examples that
will hopefully give you a feel for how to set the indexed and stored options:
indexed="true" stored="true"
Use this for information yo
Here's the Jira issue for the distributed search issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632
I tried applying this patch but, get the same error that is posted in the
discussion section for that issue. I will be glad to help too on this one.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Erick Erick
I think this is a JDBC warning message since some isolation levels may not
be implemented in the actual (Oracle) implementation (e.g.:
READ_UNCOMMITTED).
May your issue be related to some transactions updating/inserting/deleting
records on your Oracle DB while trying to run DIH?
Regards,
Tommaso
2
Dear all,
three months after the highly anticipated proof of architecture release,
we're living up to our promises, and are releasing Lily 'CR' 0.2 today - a
fully-distributed, highly scalable and highly available content repository,
marrying best-of-breed database and search technology into a pow
Hello Lance,
form the command line run:
> export JAVA_OPTS='-d64 -Xms128m -Xmx5g'
eventually changing values of Xms and Xmx.
Hope this helps.
Tommaso
2010/10/29 Lance Norskog
> When you start the Tomcat app, you tell it how much memory to allocate
> to the JVM. I don't remember where, probably
You should be building your index on a field that creates tokens on whitespace.
So your dictionary would have "iphone" and "case" as separate terms instead of
"iphone case" as one term. And if you query on something like "iphole case",
it will give suggestions for "iphole" but not for "case" b
Well, you could do a magnitude notation approach. Depends on how complex the
strings are, but based on your examples, this would work:
1) Identify a series of integers in the string. (This assumes lengths are no
more than 9 for each series).
2) Insert the number of integers into the string be
Thanks for reply.
I'm looking for how to improve the speed of the search query. The
QueryElevation Component is taking too much time which is
unacceptable. The size of elevation file is only 1 Mb. I wonder other
people using this component without problems (related to speed)? Am I
using it the wro
Thanks for reply.
I'm looking for how to improve the speed of the search query. The
QueryElevation Component is taking too much time which is
unacceptable. The size of elevation file is only 1 Mb. I wonder other
people using this component without problems (related to speed)? Am I
using it the wro
Solved this issue, by setting the maxHttpHeaderSize to 65536 in
tomcat/conf/server.xml file.
Otherwise Tomcat was not responding.
Swapnonil Mukherjee
On 29-Oct-2010, at 2:43 PM, Swapnonil Mukherjee wrote:
I am using the SOLRJ client to post my query, The query length is roughly
10,000 char
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Ryan Walker wrote:
>
> We are launching a new version of our job board helping returning veterans
> find a civilian job, and we chose Solr and Sunspot[1] to power our search. We
> really didn't consider the power users in the HR world who are trained to use
> bo
We are launching a new version of our job board helping returning veterans find
a civilian job, and we chose Solr and Sunspot[1] to power our search. We really
didn't consider the power users in the HR world who are trained to use boolean
search, for example:
"Engineer" AND ("Electrical" OR "M
I modified the text of this hopefully to make it clearer. I wasn't sure what
I was asking was coming across well. And I'm adding this comment in a
shameless attempt to boost my question back to the top for people to see.
Before I write a messy work around, just wanted to check the community to
see
How about creating another field for doing exact matches (a string);
searching both and boosting the string match?
-Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Imran [mailto:imranboho...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 6:25 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Influencing s
Could any one shed a light please?
I saw in the log a message as below, but I don't think it's the root
cause, because my dataSrouce, the readOnly is true
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: READ_COMMITTED and SERIALIZABLE are
the only valid transaction levels
A newbie Solr user
===
Hi All
We've got an index in which we have a multiValued field per document.
Assume the multivalue field values in each document to be;
Doc1:
bar lifters
Doc2:
truck tires
back drops
bar lifters
Doc 3:
iron bar lifters
Doc 4:
brass bar lifters
iron bar lifters
tire something
truck something
o
I do not know if this is accurate. There are direct tools to monitor
these problems: jconsole, visualgc/visualvm, YourKit, etc. Often these
counts allot many things to one place that should be spread out.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Chamnap Chhorn
wrote:
> anyone has some suggestions to imp
When you start the Tomcat app, you tell it how much memory to allocate
to the JVM. I don't remember where, probably in catalina.sh.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:56 AM, satya swaroop wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your reply.I have a doubt whether to increase the ram or
> heap size to java o
On 29/10/2010 12:08, Lance Norskog wrote:
There are a few problems that can happen. This is usually a sign of
garbage collection problems.
You can monitor the Tomcat instance with JConsole or one of the other
java monitoring tools and see if there is a memory leak.
Also, most people don't need t
Then, Godwin!
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 10:06 +0200, Mark Allan wrote:
>> For me, I simply deleted the original email, but I'm now quite
>> enjoying the irony of the complaints causing more noise on the list
>> than the original email! ;-)
>
ExternalFileField can only be used for boosting. It is not a
"first-class" field.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Another approach would be to use ExternalFileField and keep the price data,
> : normalized to USD, outside of the index. Every time the currency rates
>
There are a few problems that can happen. This is usually a sign of
garbage collection problems.
You can monitor the Tomcat instance with JConsole or one of the other
java monitoring tools and see if there is a memory leak.
Also, most people don't need to do it, but you can automatically
restart i
Yes, from Solr 1.2 to 1.3/Lucene 2.4.1 to 2.9 there was a change in
the Porter stemmer for English. I don't know what it was. It may also
affect the other language variants of the stemmer.
If stemming is important for your users, you might want to try the
Solr 3.x branch instead, or find Lucid's K
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 10:06 +0200, Mark Allan wrote:
> For me, I simply deleted the original email, but I'm now quite
> enjoying the irony of the complaints causing more noise on the list
> than the original email! ;-)
He he. An old classic. Next in line is the meta-meta-discussion about
whet
Hi All,
Thanks for your reply.I have a doubt whether to increase the ram or
heap size to java or to tomcat where the solr is running
Regards,
satya
If you change 'title' to be single-valued, the Extracting thing may or
may not override it. I remember a go-round on this problem. But the
ExtractingWhatsIt has code that explicitly checks for single-valued
v.s. multi-valued.
And this may all be different in different Solr versions. The
DataImport
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 10:18 +0200, RL wrote:
> Executing a query and sorting by this field leads to unnatural sorting of :
> string1
> string10
> string2
That's very much natural. Numbers are not treated any different from
words made up of letters. Your have to use alignment if you want to use
nat
I am using the SOLRJ client to post my query, The query length is roughly
10,000 characters. I am using GET like this.
int page = 1;
int resultsPerPage = 24;
ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams();
params.set("q", query);
params.set("start
If the problem is autowarming queries running in the meantime maybe you
could consider changing set to true the following:
false
and/or change this value
2
another option would be lowering the value of autowarmCount inside the cache
definitions.
Hope this helps.
Tommaso
2010/10/25 Jona
Cheers Hoss. That did it for me.
~~Sent by an Android
On 29 Oct 2010 00:39, "Chris Hostetter" wrote:
>
> The specifics of your overall goal confuse me a bit, but drilling down to
> your core question...
>
> : I want to be able to use the dismax parser to search on both terms
> : (assigning slops
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Pablo Recio wrote:
> That's my schema XML:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[...]
> required="true" multiValued="false" omitNorms="f
I think string10 is before string2 in lexicographic order?
On 29 October 2010 09:18, RL wrote:
>
> Just a quick question about natural sorting of strings.
>
> I've a simple dynamic field in my schema:
>
> omitNorms="true"/>
> omitNorms="true"/>
>
> There are 3 indexed strings for example
> str
Hi,
How come $subject is present??
--
Regards,
Tharindu
Just a quick question about natural sorting of strings.
I've a simple dynamic field in my schema:
There are 3 indexed strings for example
string1,string2,string10
Executing a query and sorting by this field leads to unnatural sorting of :
string1
string10
string2
(Some time ago i used Lucen
That's my schema XML:
link
text
...
2010/10/28 Gora Mohanty
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
> >
For me, I simply deleted the original email, but I'm now quite
enjoying the irony of the complaints causing more noise on the list
than the original email! ;-)
M
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
I'm Nutch user but I'm considering to use Solr for the following reason.
I need a LIKE:foo , which turns into a *foo* query. I saw the built-in
prefix query parser but it does only look for foo*, if I understand it well
So is there a query parser that does what I'm looking.
If not how difficult is
anyone has some suggestions to improve the search?
thanks
On 10/28/10, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Sorry for very bad pasting. I paste it again.
>
> Slowest Components Count Exclusive
> Total
> QueryElevationComponent 1 5
Hi Everybody,
It seems that the maximum query length supported by the Dismax Query Handler is
3534 characters. Is there anyway I can set this limit to be around 12,000?
If I fire a query beyond 3534 characters, I don't even get error messages in
the catalina.XXX log files.
Swapnonil Mukherjee
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, scott chu (朱炎詹)
wrote:
> When I first saw this particular email, I wrote a letter intend to ask the
> sender remove solr-user from its recepient cause I thought this should go to
> solr-dev. But then I thought again, it's about 'job-offer' not 'development
> of So
59 matches
Mail list logo
