"Staging" the data in a non-Solr store sounds like a potentially reasonable
idea to me. You might want to consider a NoSQL store of some kind like MongoDB
perhaps, instead of an rdbms.
The way to think about Solr is not as a store or a database -- it's an index
for serving your application. Th
Thanks for the responses people.
@Grant
1. can you show me some direction on that.. loading data from an incoming
stream.. do I need some third party tools, or need to build something myself...
4. I am basically attempting to build a very fast search interface for the
existing data. The volu
Hi Maheshkumar,
I attached a patch for inclusion of this project as a Solr contrib module
[1] , there you can find the patch to apply to the Solr trunk along with
needed jars (attached as a zip archive).
I think that your issue could be related to the fact that GC project
dependency is from Solr 1.
Hi everybody,
I`m implementing my first solr engine for conceptual tests, I`m crawling my
wiki intranet to make some searches, the engine is working fine already, but
I need some interface to make my searchs.
Somebody knows where can I find some search interface just for
customizations?
Tks
--
C
: I was wondering what would be the best FieldType for storing date with a
: millisecond precision that would allow me to sort and run range queries
: against this field. We would like to achieve the best query performance,
: minimal heap - fieldcache - requirements, good indexing throughput an
: References:
:
: In-Reply-To:
:
: Subject: Grouping in solr ?
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you chang
: In our setup, we run several instances of Solr under one instance of
: Tomcat. I simply rename the WAR to soemthing we use internally -
: solr-people, solr-connections, solr-companies, etc etc. This part works
: fine and lets us have, use, and maintain invidual instances.
...
: What
is this fixed in solr-1.4.1 ?
I have seen ConcurrentModificationException during search
operation using EmbeddedSolrServer, when tested using jmeter with
on more than one Concurrent users.
best,
Reuben
On 5/5/2009 2:25 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wr
Solr will match this in version 3.1 which is the next major release.
Read this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud for feature descriptions
Coming to a trunk near you - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1873
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominven
No, I checked, there is a city called Swan in Iowa. So, it is getting from the
city index, so is Clerk. But why does it favor Swan than San? Spellcheck get
weird after I treat city name as one token. If I do it in the old way, it let
San go, and correct Jos as Ojos instead of Jose because Oj
Hmmm, did you rebuild your spelling index after the config changes?
And it really looks like somehow you're getting results from a field other
than city. Are you also sure that your cityname field is of type
autocomplete1?
Shooting in the dark here, but these results are so weird that I suspect
i
No, it doesn't work, I got weird result. I set my city name field to be parsed
as a token as following:
I got following result for spellcheck:
-
-
1
Maybe process the city name as a single token?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Savannah Beckett
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have city name as a text field, and I want to do spellcheck on it. I use
> setting in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
>
> If I setup city name as text field and do
Hi,
I have city name as a text field, and I want to do spellcheck on it. I use
setting in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
If I setup city name as text field and do spell check on "San Jos" for San
Jose,
I get suggestion for Jos as "ojos". I checked the extendedresult and I f
I am trying to configure the data-config.xml using the XPathEntityProcessor
to index nested xml entities such as the following:
Drug
fentanyl sublingual spray
Other
questionnaire administration
The data-config.xml looks like this:
but it only indexes the first
Hi Ahson,
You'll really want to store an additional date field (make it a
TrieDateField type) that has only the date, and in the reverse order
from how you've shown it. You can still keep the one you've got, just
use it only for 'human viewing' rather than sorting.
Something like:
20080205 if you
Ah, totally looked over that news: spatial search in 3.x! :-D :-D
Any idea already when this will be released?
Awesome to hear that it has been moved forward! :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-Solr-right-for-our-project-tp1589927p1592448.html
Sent from
Wow, that is a relief!
I was going to have to look at ElasticSearch instead.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Mon, 9/27/10, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
Can someone share some good resources (books, articles, links, etc.) for
tuning relevancy scores with multiple factors? I'm playing with different
fields and boosts in my 'qf', 'pf', and 'bf' defaults but I feel like I'm
shooting in the dark. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook has
a
@Walter Underwood:
Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Right now, I think the only way to get spatial search in Solr is to deploy
> a nightly snapshot from the active development on trunk.
>
Could you give me the link to this trunk, I need it very much!
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http
Right, I know, I was curious about it's current closeness to being in
main distro, not a patch. Among other things, when those who know
better decide it goes in core distro, that makes me more comfortable
that they've decided it works acceptably, and also makes more more
comfortable that it wi
Hi Jonathan,
Field collpasing is available in 1.4 by applying patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
-Ravi
From: Jonathan Rochkind
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010 9:18:20 PM
Subject: Re: Is Solr right for my bus
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
There is now group-by capabilities in trunk as well, which may or may not help.
Really, the field collapsing stuff has been committed to trunk finally?
Or are you talking about something else?
If it's the field collapsing stuff, and it's been committed to trunk,
doe
Inline.
On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> When do you need to deploy?
>
> As I understand it, the spatial search in Solr is being rewritten and is
> slated for Solr 4.0, the release after next.
It will be in 3.x, the next release
>
> The existing spatial search has some
hi all
I have a question related to sorting of date field i have Date field that is
indexed like a string and look like "5/2/2008 4:33:30 PM" i want to do sorting
on this field on the basis of date, time does not matters. any suggestion how
i
could ignore the time part from this field and
2010/9/27 newsam :
> I have setup a SOLR searcher instance with Tomcat 5.5.21. However, the
> response time is too long. Here is my scenario:
> 1. The index file is 8.2G. The doc num is 6110745.
> 2. DELL Server: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU (4 cores) 3.00GHZ, 6G Mem.
>
> I used "Key:*" to query all reco
Hi Yonik,
>>If the new "autoGeneratePhraseQueries" is off, position doesn't matter, and
>>the query will
>>be treated as "index" OR "reader".
Just wanted to make sure, in Solr does autoGeneratePhraseQueries = "off" treat
the query with the *default* query operator as set in SolrConfig rather t
Hi Jonathan,
>> I'm afraid I'm having trouble understanding "if the analyzer returns more
>> than one position back from a "queryparser token"
>>I'm not sure if "the queryparser forms a phrase query without explicit phrase
>>quotes" is a problem for me, I had no idea it happened until now, ne
When do you need to deploy?
As I understand it, the spatial search in Solr is being rewritten and is slated
for Solr 4.0, the release after next.
The existing spatial search has some serious problems and is deprecated.
Right now, I think the only way to get spatial search in Solr is to deploy a
I am sure these kind of questions keep coming to you guys, but I want to raise
the same question in a different context...my own business situation.
I am very very new to solr and though I have tried to read through the
documentation, I have nowhere near completing the whole read.
The need is li
(I apologize in advance if I missed something in your documentation,
but I've read through the Wiki on the subject of distributed searches
and didn't find anything conclusive)
We are currently evaluating Solr and Autonomy. Solr is attractive due
to its open source background, following and price.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Bharat Jain wrote:
> We are running into issues with SOLR queries. Our solr queries just hang.
Are you perhaps using distributed search and accidentally set up an
infinite loop?
Do *not* configure a default "shards" param on your /select handler.
Other than th
Hi,
We are running into issues with SOLR queries. Our solr queries just hang.
We are using SOLR 1.3 and below is the stack trace from threaddump. We are
clueless about what can be causing this issue. We are in the midst of
firefighting with our customer and any help is appreciated. Thanks,Bharat
Also, how many rows are you requesting at one time? I've seen cases where
the query time is blazing fast and the response writing is terribly slow
because of too many documents being sent in the response.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:37 AM, kenf_nc wrote:
>
> "mem usage is over 400M", do you mean T
"mem usage is over 400M", do you mean Tomcat mem size? If you don't give your
cache sizes enough room to grow you will choke the performance. You should
adjust your Tomcat settings to let the cache grow to at least 1GB or better
would be 2GB. You may also want to look into
http://wiki.apache.org/
You could get it from Solr, yes. That didn't even occur to me because
when I was designing my scripts, I didn't yet have a fully integrated
Solr index. :) With hindsight, I still wouldn't get it from Solr. I
would lose some flexibility and ease of administration.
It's certainly possible to
I want to provide auto-complete to users when they're inputting tags. The
auto-complete tag suggestions would be based on tags that are already in the
system.
Multiple tags are separated by commas. A single tag could contain multiple
words such as "Apple computer".
One issue is that a tag coul
Hi Tommaso,
All UIMA dependencies (uima-core,AlchemyAPIAnnotator, OpenCalaisAnnotator,
Tagger, WhitespaceTokenizer) are 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT. All are checkout from svn
AlchemyAPIAnnotator:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/trunk/AlchemyAPIAnnotator
OpenCalaisAnnotator:
http://svn.apache.org
Robert & Erik,
I appreciate your suggestions but we use Type for other purpose.
Also, the product is out and we can't change the design so easily.
So it seems the conclusion there is no such TokenFilter.
I'll write one.
Thanks.
On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2
You can use copyField to get multiple fields in the field you use for spell
checking, don't forget to set it to multiValued.
-Original message-
From: Savannah Beckett
Sent: Mon 27-09-2010 10:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: spellcheck on multiple fields?
Is it possible to
We used SOLR 1.4. All queries were excuted in SOLR back-end. I guess that I/O
operations consume the time too much.
>From: "newsam"
>Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org"newsam"
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Subject: Re:The search response time is too loong
>Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:05:49
I have setup a SOLR searcher instance with Tomcat 5.5.21. However, the response
time is too long. Here is my scenario:
1. The index file is 8.2G. The doc num is 6110745.
2. DELL Server: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU (4 cores) 3.00GHZ, 6G Mem.
I used "Key:*" to query all records by localhost:8080. The res
Is it possible to do spellcheck on multiple fields in my solr index? If so,
how? The following setup works for only one field:
default
solr.IndexBasedSpellChecker
myfield
./spellchecker1
0.5
true
Thanks.
43 matches
Mail list logo
