The new PECL package solr-0.9.11 (beta) has been released at
http://pecl.php.net/.
Release notes
-
- Added ability to specify response writer in constructor option ("wt")
- Added new method to set response writer SolrClient::setResponseWriter()
- Currently, the only supported response
I don't know because it's patched by someone else but I can't get his
help. When this component become a contrib? Using patch is so annoying
2010/6/22 Martijn v Groningen :
> What version of Solr and which patch are you using?
>
> On 21 June 2010 11:46, Li Li wrote:
>> it says "Either filter or
Huh? Read through the wiki: See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LocalParams but I
still don't understand its utility?
Can someone explain to me why this would even be used? Any examples to help
clarify? Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/LocalParams-tp91318
Thanks Marc!
-John
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> Maybe this helps:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#QParserPlugin
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-query-boosting-be-used-with-a-custom-request-handlers-tp884499p9126
Well, sorting requires that all the unique values in the target field
get loaded into memory, so it's possible that's the culprit. This
would likely only show up if you have a relatively small test set,
or the multivalued entries that you added are new to your corpus.
To test this stab in the dark,
Hi Alex,
finally found a solution through stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3025464/how-to-deploy-the-same-webapp-with-different-logging-tomcat-solr
=>
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch09_9.4.2.1
Excerpt from this link:
"To change logging settings for Solr
Maybe this helps:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#QParserPlugin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-query-boosting-be-used-with-a-custom-request-handlers-tp884499p912691.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
I have a requirement and I am wondering what is the best way to handle this
through Solr.
I have different types of unrelated data for example categories, tags and some
address information.
I would like to implement auto complete on this information, so there would be
an auto complete fo
What version of Solr and which patch are you using?
On 21 June 2010 11:46, Li Li wrote:
> it says "Either filter or filterList may be set in the QueryCommand,
> but not both." I am newbie of solr and have no idea of the exception.
> What's wrong with it? thank you.
>
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentE
Oh in that case is the code stable enough to use it for production?
- Well this feature is a patch and I think that says it all.
Although bugs are fixed it is deferentially an experimental feature
and people should keep that in mind when using one of the patches.
Does it support features which
I completely agreed. Thanks a lot!
-S
On Jun 21, 2010, at 9:08 PM, Abdelhamid ABID wrote:
> Why would someone port the solr config into servlet code ?
> IMO the first option would be the best choice, one obvious reason is that,
> when alter the solr config you only need to restart the server, w
Hi Raakhi,
First, field collapsing works pretty well in our system. And, as Martin
has said on 17.06.2010 in the other thread "Field Collapsing SOLR-236":
I've added a new patch to the issue, so building the trunk (rev
955615) with the latest patch should not be a problem. Due to recent
changes i
: I couldn't really figure out if we a have option for sorting the facet
: field by name in ascending/descending.
facet fields are returned inthe order the client requests them, so if you
wnat them in a differnet order just ask for them i na differnet order.
FWIW: this isn't evne a good idea t
Why would someone port the solr config into servlet code ?
IMO the first option would be the best choice, one obvious reason is that,
when alter the solr config you only need to restart the server, whereas
changing in the source drive you to redeploy your app and restart the
server.
On 6/21/10,
:
:
:
: It uses the text field type as its defined in Solr schema. I didn't
: change it.
which version of Solr? (the schema is just an example, and the field types
in the example schema change between versions as new analysis
components are added and best practices are re-evaluated)
: The i
: which I want to do whole word search only.. I made those 2 fields to be of
: type 'string'.
:
:
:
: I also have a dynamic field with textgen field type as below
:
:
:
: This dynamic field seems to capture all the data including the data from UID
no .. that doesn't sound right. if you in
Hi Hoss,
You're the man.
I'd copied/pasted the 1.3 schema fields into my testbed schema, which
was based on the version of Solr we were using back in the Dark Ages,
when the version was 1.0 (and there was no such handy comment warning
about changing the version :)) So fields were multivalu
: Subject: Solr / Solrj Wildcard Phrase Searches
: References:
: In-Reply-To:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if y
: 39 CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new CoreContainer.Initializer();
: 40 coreContainer = initializer.initialize(); 41 solrServer = new
: EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, "");
: A method that does this can be invoked over HTTP service to force the
: reindexing:
our of curiousity: why r
: Here's what's in my schema:
:
:
:
: Which is exactly what was in the original example schema.
but what does hte "version" property of your schema say (at the top) this
is what's in the example...
-Hoss
Hello,
I'm developing a Web application that communicate with Solr using SolrJ. I have
three search interfaces, and I'm facing two options:
1- Configuring one SearchHandler per search interface in solrconfig.xml
Or
2- Write the configuration in the java servlet code that is using SolrJ
It the
On Jun 19, 2010, at 7:48pm, Erik Hatcher wrote:
That's not a bug with the example schema, as price is a single-
valued field. getFirstValue will work, yes, but isn't necessary
when it's single valued. If you've got multiple prices, you
probably want something like:
#foreach($price in
Hi,
I have an index with the following fields:
id (unique)
title
description
price.
Suppose i want to find unique documents and count of all documents with the
same title, sorted on price.
How do i go about it.
Knowing that field collapsing is not stable with 1.4.
if
Ah ok. I don't think that option exists out-of-the box.
What is your use-case? Perhaps you could achieve it easily on the client
side? (Given that you return all facets at once (facet.limit=-1))
2010/6/21 Ankit Bhatnagar
>
>
> I am looking for something different.
>
> I want to be able to sor
I am looking for something different.
I want to be able to sort (asc/desc) the name ie toggle them
Ankit
-Original Message-
From: Geert-Jan Brits [mailto:gbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 12:30 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sort facet Field by name
fac
facet.sort=false
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.sort
2010/6/21 Ankit Bhatnagar
> Hi All,
> I couldn't really figure out if we a have option for sorting the facet
> field by name in ascending/descending.
>
> Any clues?
>
> Thanks
> Ankit
>
Hi All,
I couldn't really figure out if we a have option for sorting the facet field by
name in ascending/descending.
Any clues?
Thanks
Ankit
Mr Lance
Thanks
a lot for ur reply.. I am a novice a solr / lucene. but i have gone
thru the documentations of both.I have even implemented programs in
lucene for searching etc.
My problem is to apply a new search technique other than the one used by solr.
Step 1: My algorithm finds the tf idf
Or even better for an exact string query:
q={!raw f=field_name}sony vaio
(that's NOT URL encoded, but needs to be when sending the request over
HTTP)
Erik
On Jun 21, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent wrote:
Hi,
You either need to quote your string: http://localhost:89
Hi,
You either need to quote your string:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q="sony+vaio";
or to escape the space: http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=sony\+vaio
If you do not do one of these, your query will be parsed as text:sony OR
text:vaio, which will not match your string field.
--
Jan H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep, houses are just basic commodities in this case.
I decided to go for a single entry in the index per date of each
property because it makes faceting and querying so much easier and means
I can also use facet.limit=-1 for distinct properties.
My q
You are right. It seems TikaEntityProcessor is exactly the tool you
need in this case.
Alex
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> : I think you can use existing ExtractingRequestHandler to do the job,
> : i.e. add child entity to your DIH metadata
>
> why would you do this in
Interesting, pre calculated, different prices on different days of the week? So
houses are like groceries, huh? :-)
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Mon
Hi
I use a string Field in my solr schema
but when I query a value with space it doesn't give me results
e.g I have a value "sony vaio" when I query with "sony vaio" I
get 0 results
but when I query "sony*" I get my results
how can I query a strin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Need to search, facet and filter, sadly.
Right now I am working on just storing the date ranges and min/max
prices as you suggested, seemed like the best solution so far.
Thanks for confirming the idea for me though.
On 21/06/10 12:33, Peter Karich
Do you need to search (or facetting, filtering) through the dates or costs?
Maybe you can store only the max and min price and the
available-date-range in solr?
And then get detailed information from an additional database-query?
Peter.
> I want to be able to store property information in Solr, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I want to be able to store property information in Solr, including
descriptions, tags, keywords etc. This is really easy to do.
But also I need to be able to store a range of dates that the property
is available along with costings. Currently we're us
hi,
I am new to solr and have been trying to get clustering set up and working. I
ran the command ant get-libraries and it successfully completed so I assume all
the files I need are now installed on my server (centos). When I try to restart
tomcat however I get this error in the log
Jun 21,
it says "Either filter or filterList may be set in the QueryCommand,
but not both." I am newbie of solr and have no idea of the exception.
What's wrong with it? thank you.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Either filter or filterList may be
set in the QueryCommand, but not both.
at
org
Compiling solr with lucene 2.9.3 instead of 2.9.1 will solve this issue?
Regards,
Matteo
On 19 June 2010 02:28, Lance Norskog wrote:
> The Lucene implementation of sorting creates an array of four-byte
> ints for every document in the index, and another array of the unique
> values in the field.
Hi Eric,
only with POST the action attribute in the form element is allowed to
have a query string. With GET, the query string is removed.
(Don't ask me why, though.)
Chantal
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 04:44 +0200, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Fixed.
>
> action URLs really shouldn't have query string par
I will be out of the office starting 21/06/2010 and will not return until
19/07/2010.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic31907.jpg)
That does work. I re-checked my code, and there was a bug which submitted
an empty string as the xml instead of the generated delete command. With
this fixed, it seems to work without a problem.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> How are you submitting this (POST or GET)?
> I'm using SOLR 1.4 with a few
> multi-cores, running under a Tomcat 6
> environment. I'm using the web services to pass xml
> documents for adding
> records with no problem, using a URL on my development
> machine of "
> http://localhost:8080/Solr/product/update/";
>
> I've tried implementing a
Hi,
Oh in that case is the code stable enough to use it for production?
Does it support features which solr 1.4 normally supports?
I am using facets as a workaround but then i am not able to sort on any
other field. is there any workaround to support this feature??
Regards,
Raakhi
On Fri, Ju
I'm using SOLR 1.4 with a few multi-cores, running under a Tomcat 6
environment. I'm using the web services to pass xml documents for adding
records with no problem, using a URL on my development machine of "
http://localhost:8080/Solr/product/update/";
I've tried implementing an XML-based delete
46 matches
Mail list logo
