Has anybody done personalized search with Solr? I'm thinking of including
fields such as "bought" or "like" per member/visitor via dynamic fields to a
product search schema. Another option is to have a multi-value field that
can contain user IDs. What are the possible performance issues with this
s
I am trying to subclass DIH to add I am having a hard time trying to get
access to the current Solr Context. How is this possible?
Is there anyway to get access to the current DataSource, DataImporter etc?
On a related note... when working with an onImportEnd, or onImportStart how
can I get a r
Pretty much every one of my queries is going to be unique. However, the query
is fairly complex and also contains both unique and non-unique data. In the
query, some fields will be unique (e.g description), but other fields will be
fairly common (e.g. category). If we could use those common fiel
Sorry. Wasn't intended as a hijacking :-(
: Subject: Moving from Lucene to Solr?
: References:
: In-Reply-To:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instea
Folks,
We have a problem in our environment where after a system is idle the query
time goes up from a few 100ms to 4+ seconds after 9 hours of idle time on
the system.
System Details:
- Solr 1.4
- 10 Million Index.
- Use MMAP for mapping the index files in memory
Test Details:
- 8 hour perf
:
: These entries were moved here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageAnalysis
but there doesn't seem to be a link to that page from
AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters (or from anywhere on the wiki according to
the wiki link search feature) ... so i'll add some verbage about it.
:
: On Wed, May
: Subject: Moving from Lucene to Solr?
: References:
: In-Reply-To:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change
Hi Asif,
These entries were moved here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageAnalysis
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Asif Rahman wrote:
> I see that the entries for PorterStemFilterFactory,
> EnglishPorterFilterFactory, and SnowballPorterFilterFactory have been
> removed from the Analyzers, Tok
: "Switched" works for the specific setup i'm using - the server would refer
: to itself in the CommonHttpSolrServer request sent, i.e. it would run both
: the server and client sides. Removing this and simply using
: EmbeddedSolrServer just made the setup a little more sane in that aspect.
: Does
I see that the entries for PorterStemFilterFactory,
EnglishPorterFilterFactory, and SnowballPorterFilterFactory have been
removed from the Analyzers, Tokenizers, and Token Filters wiki page. Is
there a reason for this?
Thanks,
asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
htt
I suppose you are still losing some performance on the replicated box since it
needs to use some resources to warm the cache. It would be nice if a warmed
cache could be replicated from the master though perhaps that's not practical.
Chris is right though: The newly updated index created by a co
: I've always undestand that if you do a commit (replication does it), a new
: searcher is open, and you lose performance (queries per second) while the
: caches are regenerated. I think i don't explain correctly my situation
not if you configure your caches with autowarming -- then solr will war
Hi Dan,
It seems that you want a SearchComponent[1], something like the
QueryElevationComponent[2].
Take a look how at him and I think you can build your custom solution.
[1]-
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SearchComponent.html
[2]- http://wiki.apache.org/solr
Hello, I translate this article into Spanish. It is very helpful to avoid
common mistakes in solr installations.
http://www.linebee.com/?p=434&lang=es
Thanks,
Juan
> I am running solr in 64 bit HP-UX system. The total
> index size is about
> 5GB and when i try load any new document, solr tries to
> merge the existing
> segments first and results in following error. I could see
> a temp file is
> growng within index dir around 2GB in size and later it
> fails
Hi All,
I am running solr in 64 bit HP-UX system. The total index size is about
5GB and when i try load any new document, solr tries to merge the existing
segments first and results in following error. I could see a temp file is
growng within index dir around 2GB in size and later it fails with
I have a "indexed_timestamp" field in my index - which lets me know when
document was indexed:
For some reason when doing delta indexing via DIH, this field is not being
updated.
Are timestamp fields updated during DELTA updates?
Kind regards,
Vladimir Sutskever
Investment Bank - Techno
thank you all ;)
2010/5/19 Jan Kammer
> There is something called dismax-requesthandler. I think this is what you
> are looking for.
>
> greetz, Jan
>
>
> Am 19.05.2010 15:47, schrieb Antonello Mangone:
>
> Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if it's possible to use the *
>> defaultSearchField* on
yes I think that will make a good solution. In Dänish "sku" is a bad word
;-), but thanks for the info.
Nagelberg, Kallin wrote:
>
> Sorry, in North America 'sku' (stock keeping unit) is the common term in
> business to specifically identify a particular product,
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sku.
>
> createn an Jar-file. this jar file delete my table.
>
> but SOLR absolute dont want to start this JAR. i put a
> run.bat file into my
> folder where is my jar saved. this batch-file runs and
> delete the table, but
> when solr start this batch-file. it doesnt work. i dont
> know why. !?!?!?
> i
Sorry, in North America 'sku' (stock keeping unit) is the common term in
business to specifically identify a particular product,
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sku.
And yes, I think you understand me. I am imagining you can structure your
products in a hierarchy. For each node in the tree you traverse a
sorry, what does "sku" mean?
I understand you like this: indexing base and variants, and include all
atributes (for one base and its variants) in each document. I think that
would work. Thanks.
Nagelberg, Kallin wrote:
>
> I agree that pulling all attributes into the parent sku during indexing
your are right, in that case an arbitrary on would have to be chosen or
probably then both should be in the result set. Difficult to say what the
marketing department would like ;-)
Leonardo Menezes wrote:
>
> if that is so, and maybe, you have for example, two variants of cars with
> automati
I agree that pulling all attributes into the parent sku during indexing could
work well. Define a Boolean field like 'isVirtual' to identify the non-leaf
skus, and use a multi-valued field for each of the attributes. For now you can
do a search like (isVirtual:true AND doorType:screen). If at a
if that is so, and maybe, you have for example, two variants of cars with
automatic, what would define on which one was the hit? or field dont share
common information across variants? if they do share, you wouldnt be able to
define in which one was the hit(because it was on both of them) and would
thanks. Currently not, but requirements change all the time as always ;-)
If we get a requirement, that a facet shall be "material of doors", we will
need to know which variant was the hit. I would like to be prepared for
that.
Leonardo Menezes wrote:
>
> would you then need to know in which
>
> The way you phrased that paragraph makes me think that one of us doesn't
> understand what exactly you did when you "switched" ...
>
"Switched" works for the specific setup i'm using - the server would refer
to itself in the CommonHttpSolrServer request sent, i.e. it would run both
the server
would you then need to know in which variant was your match produced?
because if not, you can just index the whole thing as one single document...
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, hkmortensen wrote:
>
> I do searching for products. Each base product exist in variants as well.
> One
> variant has
hey, thx
i did all what you say.
createn an Jar-file. this jar file delete my table.
but SOLR absolute dont want to start this JAR. i put a run.bat file into my
folder where is my jar saved. this batch-file runs and delete the table, but
when solr start this batch-file. it doesnt work. i dont k
I do searching for products. Each base product exist in variants as well. One
variant has a glass door, another a steel door etc. The variants can have
diffent prices. The base product does not really exist, only the variants
exists IRL. The case corresponds to cars: the car model is the base prod
There is something called dismax-requesthandler. I think this is what
you are looking for.
greetz, Jan
Am 19.05.2010 15:47, schrieb Antonello Mangone:
Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if it's possible to use the *
defaultSearchField* on more fields ???
i.e.
field1, field2, field3
Thanks
> Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if
> it's possible to use the *
> defaultSearchField* on more fields ???
>
> i.e.
>
> field1, field2, field3
>
>
No. But you can query multiple fields using dismax.
qf=field1,field2,field3&defType=dismax
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler
Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if it's possible to use the *
defaultSearchField* on more fields ???
i.e.
field1, field2, field3
Thanks you all
Thanks for the info , using the above properties solved the issue .
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/jmx-issue-with-solr-tp828478p829057.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Leonardo,
I was able to use the feature with a dynamic field as pointed in the
documentation.
So, I was just curious to take a peek at the values that are generated, even
when the field is not dynamic, so I tried to figure out a way to do so.
Maybe some output when the debug query is enabled would
Hi,
Try adding these options...
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false
On 2010-05-19, at 3:44 AM, Na_D wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to start solr with the following command :
>
> java -Dsolr.solr.home="./example-DIH/solr/" -Dcom.sun.man
> TermsComponent maybe?
>
> or faceting?
> q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=signatureField&defType=lucene&rows=0&start=0
>
> if you append &facet.mincount=1 to above url you can
> see your duplications
>
After re-reading your message: sometimes you want to show duplicates, sometimes
you don't wan
> Basically for some uses cases I would like to show
> duplicates for other I
> wanted them ignored.
>
> If I have overwriteDupes=false and I just create the dedup
> hash how can I
> query for only unique hash values... ie something like a
> SQL group by.
TermsComponent maybe?
or faceting?
q
Hi Peter,
You need to use Lucene,
- To have more control
- You cannot depend on any Web server
- To use termvector, termdocs etc
- You could easily extend to have your own Analyzer
You need to use Solr,
- To index and search docs easily by writting few code
- Solr is a standal
Hi all,
while asking a question on stackoverflow [1] some other questions appear:
Is SolrJ a recommended way to access Solr or should I prefer the HTTP
interface?
How can I (j)unit-test Solr? (e.g. create+delete index via Java call)
Is Lucene faster than Solr? ... do you have experiences, prefer
I guess it should work because Tika Entityprocessor does not use any
new 1.4 APIs
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Sixten Otto wrote:
> Sorry to repeat this question, but I realized that it probably
> belonged in its own thread:
>
> The TikaEntityProcessor class that enables DataImportHandler to
Hi,
I have a requirement to do the following:
For up to the first 10 results (i.e. only on the first page) show
sponsored category ads, in order of bid, but no more than 2 / category,
and only if all sponsored cat' ads are more that min% of the highest
score. e.g. If I had the following:
min% =1
Do you have any insights that could help me and other people that might be
interested in that discussion?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Architecture-discussion-tp825708p828658.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey,
for random sorting, random values are generated in runtime using the seed
you passed as one of the parameters to generate the value, among other
things. this way, if the value you use as seed is the same in different
request, the sorting order should be the same. you could also, for debbuin
Hi Alexandre,
I am not totally sure about this, but the random sort field its only used to
do a random sort on your searchs, and you will to pass differents values to
have differents sorts, so this only applies in the searchs, so no value is
indexed. You will find more information here:
http://luc
Hi,
I am trying to start solr with the following command :
java -Dsolr.solr.home="./example-DIH/solr/" -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3000
On doing so an error is reported :
Error: Password file read access must be restricted: C:\Program
Files\Java\jdk1.
6.
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your answer.
I've always undestand that if you do a commit (replication does it), a new
searcher is open, and you lose performance (queries per second) while the
caches are regenerated. I think i don't explain correctly my situation
before, with my schema i want to avoid t
47 matches
Mail list logo
