Re: Please Help, how to Xinclude in schema.xml

2010-05-08 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(10/05/06 4:31), Turner, Robbin J wrote: I followed through some of the previous post, there seems to be a general problem with trying to us XInclude in the solr schema.xml. I use several variation to include my fieldType declarations. I keep getting an error file not found. I put the file

Solr work at Drupal

2010-05-08 Thread Indika Tantrigoda
Hi all, Came across this, http://groups.drupal.org/node/66608 Regards, Indika

Recommend a Enterprise search to your, it is a friendly interaction to improve the program Solr

2010-05-08 Thread Rivulet Enterprise Search
In Google, I see your masterpiece, I developed a system based on Solr Enterprise search Rivulet ES, I would like to improve him, so better use, more powerful, hope to receive your responses Rivulet ES is an open source enterprise search server based on the Lucene And Solr, Like to use Solr can us

Re: Custom DIH variables

2010-05-08 Thread Blargy
Thanks for the input Lance. My use case was actually pretty simple so my solution was relatively simple. I ended up using the HTTP method. The code is listed here: http://pastie.org/952040. I would appreciate any comments. iorixxx you may find this solution to be of some use to you. -- View th

Re: Highlighting Performance On Large Documents

2010-05-08 Thread Serdar Sahin
Hi, Sorry for the second e-mail, but for the duplication problem, I have done something wrong, ok now it works, and the query time reduced to 0.1 seconds which is perfect. However, still if I use term* directives, it gives the same error, so either I will index short_text field as well o

Re: Highlighting Performance On Large Documents

2010-05-08 Thread Serdar Sahin
Hi, Thanks. However as I said before, termOffsets/termPositions/termVectors had very little effect on the performance and I don't know why. I have done exactly what you are saying but highlighting 10 documents that have 200-400 A4 pages still takes around 2 seconds, depending on the query. I will

Re: Highlighting Performance On Large Documents

2010-05-08 Thread Lance Norskog
If you want to highlight field X, doing the termOffsets/termPositions/termVectors will make highlighting that field faster. You should make a separate field and apply these options to that field. Now: doing a copyfield adds a "value" to a multiValued field. For a text field, you get a multi-valued

Re: Custom DIH variables

2010-05-08 Thread Lance Norskog
No, I mean the embedded interface and the servlet interface were not really designed to be used together. Inside the servlet-based interface, I would use HTTP to get to Solr. Inside an , embedded app, I would have to use the embedded interface. However, you can't do this easily in a DIH plug-in. Y

[ANN] Lucene/Solr Meetup in NYC on May 11th

2010-05-08 Thread Mark Miller
If you haven't heard, there is a Lucene/Solr meetup in New York next week: http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Apache-Lucene-Solr-Meetup/calendar/13325754/ The scheduled talks are (in addition to lightening talks): Solr 1.5 and Beyond: Yonik Seeley, author of Solr, co-founder, Lucid Imagination Topics w

Re: Highlighting Performance On Large Documents

2010-05-08 Thread Serdar Sahin
Hi, Thanks a lot for the replies, I could have chance today to test them. First of all termVectors/termPositions/termOffsets did not help, it has very little effect, but I tried a workaroud, however it is not as efficient as I thought. >From these fields; I